Quote:
Originally Posted by arvidab 
Not really, but thanks.
Got HFM running in Linux: http://www.rearengine.com/folding/TC-A1090T.html
@ceeesm: Did a bit of testing 2500K@4.4. Here's what I found:
It's pretty much the same as my X6 (a smidge faster), but then I remembered that I have a crap connection which basically makes the effective TPF (download-processing-uploading) about 48min (on a 6903) which means a couple of k's increase in PPD if we would switch. Might not be worth the hassle.
Not really, but thanks.
Got HFM running in Linux: http://www.rearengine.com/folding/TC-A1090T.html
@ceeesm: Did a bit of testing 2500K@4.4. Here's what I found:
It's pretty much the same as my X6 (a smidge faster), but then I remembered that I have a crap connection which basically makes the effective TPF (download-processing-uploading) about 48min (on a 6903) which means a couple of k's increase in PPD if we would switch. Might not be worth the hassle.
Here's what I'm getting right now on those two units. I'd say if you're fairing at what you've shared, 100% dedicated on native would still be highly competitive with 2500ks and definitely with a bloomy.
7500
Min. Time / Frame : 00:02:10 - 32,377.00 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:12 - 31,643.96 PPD
7501
Min. Time / Frame : 00:02:05 - 29,746.34 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:06 - 29,392.92 PPD
Effective TPF of about 60:30 and 92k PPD, very nice. What's cooking now?
Do you guys know if Haven figured out his issues?
