Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [[H]ardOCP] AMD 6970/6950 CFX and NVIDIA 580/570 SLI Review
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[[H]ardOCP] AMD 6970/6950 CFX and NVIDIA 580/570 SLI Review - Page 2

post #11 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by soilentblue View Post
if you float around hardforum you will notice that it's the land of big resolutions. on hardforum it's a very useful review. here it seems where 1920x1080 is king........not so much. it's also why alot of people here call amd's 6900 series a failure and they say success.

if you wanted to relate that review to single monitor setups then amd catches nvidia where AA gets raised above the normal 2x or 4x. eyefinity is alot more widely used than you may realize.
It wasn't just hardforums that has done this type of review/comparisons. Techpowerup did the exact same thing.

@zeal: You are still spending over 1000$ with the AMD cards unless you already have the three monitors.

Another thing is I also don't get 100+ frames in many games, at least not average fps.

Average frames per second is what counts to me with the eye candy mandatory, not optional.

Its also about being future ready for games not out yet. We are seeing games coming out that are more and more demanding.

I personally see dual GPUs necessary for the highest quality and smoothest gameplay on a single monitor setup already. I mean that's just my opinion, but I believe it is also shared with many other enthusiast gamers, which is why I find it strange that many of these reviews neglect the arguably largest niche, the 1080 and 1200 resolution users.

Don't get me wrong, Eyefinity has its place in reviews and clearly AMD are not only competitive performance wise but price wise are outsanding, I just find it strange that this is (I think) the third respectable site that has done the 69xx CFX vs 5xx SLi comparisons showing only multi-monitor setups.

Written by DROID2
Snowdevil
(16 items)
 
ASUS G750JM
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
[i7 4790K @ 4.4 GHz (1.186v)] [Asus Sabertooth Z97 Mark S] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
[G.Skill 32GB DDR3 2133 MHz] [Crucial MX100 256GB] [Phanteks PH-TC12DX] [Win 10.1 Pro] 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
[LG 29UM65 (2560x1080)] [QNIX Evo II LED (2560x1440)] [WASD v2 Tenkeyless] [NZXT Hale90 v2 ] 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
[ThermalTake GT10 Snow Edition] [Razer Mamba - Chroma] [Razer Kabuto] [Razer Man O' War] 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770HQ Intel HM87 Express Chipset Geforce GTX 860M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD EVO DVD-RW Stock Windows 8.1 
Monitor
1920x1080 TN 
  hide details  
Reply
Snowdevil
(16 items)
 
ASUS G750JM
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
[i7 4790K @ 4.4 GHz (1.186v)] [Asus Sabertooth Z97 Mark S] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
[G.Skill 32GB DDR3 2133 MHz] [Crucial MX100 256GB] [Phanteks PH-TC12DX] [Win 10.1 Pro] 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
[LG 29UM65 (2560x1080)] [QNIX Evo II LED (2560x1440)] [WASD v2 Tenkeyless] [NZXT Hale90 v2 ] 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
[ThermalTake GT10 Snow Edition] [Razer Mamba - Chroma] [Razer Kabuto] [Razer Man O' War] 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770HQ Intel HM87 Express Chipset Geforce GTX 860M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD EVO DVD-RW Stock Windows 8.1 
Monitor
1920x1080 TN 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 46
For my res, 580s are the best.

Although they did come at a much higher price than 6970s. Hmm..
post #13 of 46
My trigger finger is getting itchy on getting another 6950 to unlock, grr...
The 3930
(26 items)
 
Junior's 3930
(22 items)
 
DATA/HTPC
(20 items)
 
  hide details  
Reply
The 3930
(26 items)
 
Junior's 3930
(22 items)
 
DATA/HTPC
(20 items)
 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 46
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RagingCain View Post
I noticed that on Mafia II (Physx should have been off for nVidia.)

Although I knew the performance was comparable, I find it somewhat misleading because to get that performance level from the 6970/6950s, you need to be utilizing multiple monitors.

I mean its great that the ATi cards run so well at that res, most people don't use/have Eyefinity. Every comparison & review has been like this. Using resolutions that obviously go beyond the memory capacity of the Geforce cards. I don't have a problem with that, I am no fanboy, but I get this feeling like they are doing this on purpose, I just don't know why.
I see your point, but remember that nVidia's Vision Surround came out with the GTX4xx series; nVidia's own testing would have told them this would happen - their frame buffers just aren't big enough.

nVidia probably took a step back and realised that triple-screen game play represents 0.0000001% of their target market(s). If they're that interested, we'll probably see the GTX6xx with 2460MB and 3072GB framebuffers, respectively.
Ryzen
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Gigabyte GA-AB350M Gaming 3 Palit GT-430 Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 EVO AMD Wraith Spire Linux Mint 18.x Dell UltraSharp U2414H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Apple Basic Keyboard Thermaltake ToughPower 850W Lian-Li PC-A04B Logitech Trackman Wheel 
  hide details  
Reply
Ryzen
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Gigabyte GA-AB350M Gaming 3 Palit GT-430 Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 EVO AMD Wraith Spire Linux Mint 18.x Dell UltraSharp U2414H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Apple Basic Keyboard Thermaltake ToughPower 850W Lian-Li PC-A04B Logitech Trackman Wheel 
  hide details  
Reply
post #15 of 46
I think the real deal between AMD and nVidia that need comparison is price/performance.
L'ordinateur
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 950 ASUS P6X58D-E Sapphire 6870 G.Skill Ripjaw 3x2GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Caviar Black 1TB Noctua D-14 Win7 x64 Samsung 731B 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
HP OEM thingy Sapphire Pure 950w Antec DF-30 Logitech MX110 
Audio
Corsair Vengeance 1500 
  hide details  
Reply
L'ordinateur
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 950 ASUS P6X58D-E Sapphire 6870 G.Skill Ripjaw 3x2GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Caviar Black 1TB Noctua D-14 Win7 x64 Samsung 731B 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
HP OEM thingy Sapphire Pure 950w Antec DF-30 Logitech MX110 
Audio
Corsair Vengeance 1500 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 46
I just unlocked two 6950's this morning. another article that made me smile with my upgrade
post #17 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by RagingCain View Post
It wasn't just hardforums that has done this type of review/comparisons. Techpowerup did the exact same thing.

@zeal: You are still spending over 1000$ with the AMD cards unless you already have the three monitors.

Another thing is I also don't get 100+ frames in many games, at least not average fps.

Average frames per second is what counts to me with the eye candy mandatory, not optional.

Its also about being future ready for games not out yet. We are seeing games coming out that are more and more demanding.

I personally see dual GPUs necessary for the highest quality and smoothest gameplay on a single monitor setup already. I mean that's just my opinion, but I believe it is also shared with many other enthusiast gamers, which is why I find it strange that many of these reviews neglect the arguably largest niche, the 1080 and 1200 resolution users.

Don't get me wrong, Eyefinity has its place in reviews and clearly AMD are not only competitive performance wise but price wise are outsanding, I just find it strange that this is (I think) the third respectable site that has done the 69xx CFX vs 5xx SLi comparisons showing only multi-monitor setups.

Written by DROID2
It's a shame your cards are bottlenecked by your processor. My old Phenom II 940 bottlenecked my lowly 5970.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 7700k ASUS ROG Strix Z270H EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC+ 32 GB G. Skill Ripjaws V 3200MHz CL14 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Samsung 840 EVO 250GB SSD Crucial MX200 250GB SSD Samsung SATA DVD+-R burner Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
23" Samsung 1080P Leopold Linear Touch (Cherry Red) Enermax Revolution85+ 1020W Antec 300 (CM modded) 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech G500S Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 7700k ASUS ROG Strix Z270H EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC+ 32 GB G. Skill Ripjaws V 3200MHz CL14 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Samsung 840 EVO 250GB SSD Crucial MX200 250GB SSD Samsung SATA DVD+-R burner Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
23" Samsung 1080P Leopold Linear Touch (Cherry Red) Enermax Revolution85+ 1020W Antec 300 (CM modded) 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech G500S Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
Reply
post #18 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by JadedFloridian View Post
It's a shame your cards are bottlenecked by your processor. My old Phenom II 940 bottlenecked my lowly 5970.
Since when is a 5970 lowly? LOL.Since when does a 940 compare to a 1100T?And by bottlenecked you mean what? Campin under the bridge?
Amelia
(13 items)
 
Professional
(13 items)
 
RCPC#1
(17 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1100t MSI 890FX GD65 MSI Radeon HD5670 GSkill RipjawsX DDR3 PC3 12800 2x4GB CL8 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD Black 1TB SATA III Samsung BD Zalman 9900MAX Windows 7 64 Professional 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
AOC 22" LED Logitech Kingwin Lazer Platinum 500w Fractal Design R3 
Other
Samsung 470 SSD 128GB 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 960T Asus M4A88T-VEVO Asus Strix R7 370 SuperTalent Perfomance 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
GSkill Snipers Monster Daytona Seagate Barracuda 500GB 7,200 RPM 16Mb cache Memorex DVD/RW 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair H60 Windows 8N IBM 9494 19" LCD IBM 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair GS500 In Win H-Frame Wolfking OCZ Behemoth 
Audio
JBL Creature 
  hide details  
Reply
Amelia
(13 items)
 
Professional
(13 items)
 
RCPC#1
(17 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1100t MSI 890FX GD65 MSI Radeon HD5670 GSkill RipjawsX DDR3 PC3 12800 2x4GB CL8 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD Black 1TB SATA III Samsung BD Zalman 9900MAX Windows 7 64 Professional 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
AOC 22" LED Logitech Kingwin Lazer Platinum 500w Fractal Design R3 
Other
Samsung 470 SSD 128GB 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 960T Asus M4A88T-VEVO Asus Strix R7 370 SuperTalent Perfomance 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
GSkill Snipers Monster Daytona Seagate Barracuda 500GB 7,200 RPM 16Mb cache Memorex DVD/RW 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair H60 Windows 8N IBM 9494 19" LCD IBM 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair GS500 In Win H-Frame Wolfking OCZ Behemoth 
Audio
JBL Creature 
  hide details  
Reply
post #19 of 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redwoodz View Post
Since when is a 5970 lowly? LOL.Since when does a 940 compare to a 1100T?And by bottlenecked you mean what? Campin under the bridge?
Aren't the 940 and 1100T virtually the same speed clock for clock on each core? Most games won't take advantage of the 6 cores on the 1100T and therefore will perform close to a 940 (when clocked the same, of course).

The architecture itself seems to be an issue for some games. I experienced 40-70% GPU usage in some games with a 955 @ 3.8 GHz and both, 5850 crossfire and GTX 470 SLI. Don't get me wrong, a lot of games will not cause this bottleneck but the CPU intensive games generally do.
post #20 of 46
Lol @ bottleneck, this is my backup rig. I do have a i7 980x but sadly it is collecting dust due to my own water cooling snafu that I have been too lazy to fix/clean up.

At ~4.1 GHz, there is no visible bottleneck from either processor in video games, they perform identically.

@Parity
I totally agree that the Eyefinity and Surround should be compared, but thats weird that they only compared those two features no? The 5870 supported Eyefinity, and when the 480 came out (with NvSurround) there were single monitor comparisons with high resolution. I still don't quite understand why we don't see them here?

Its almost like a couple of these sites want to overly emphasize the AMDs, which isn't necessary, the 6970/6950 is very impressive especially at that price, only the less informed believe it was a failure @ launch.

Here finally found a single monitor high-res review / benchmark that actually uses 580 SLi as well:
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1488/1/

Oddly enough they left out Multi-monitor support.
Edited by RagingCain - 1/12/11 at 8:27am
Snowdevil
(16 items)
 
ASUS G750JM
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
[i7 4790K @ 4.4 GHz (1.186v)] [Asus Sabertooth Z97 Mark S] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
[G.Skill 32GB DDR3 2133 MHz] [Crucial MX100 256GB] [Phanteks PH-TC12DX] [Win 10.1 Pro] 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
[LG 29UM65 (2560x1080)] [QNIX Evo II LED (2560x1440)] [WASD v2 Tenkeyless] [NZXT Hale90 v2 ] 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
[ThermalTake GT10 Snow Edition] [Razer Mamba - Chroma] [Razer Kabuto] [Razer Man O' War] 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770HQ Intel HM87 Express Chipset Geforce GTX 860M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD EVO DVD-RW Stock Windows 8.1 
Monitor
1920x1080 TN 
  hide details  
Reply
Snowdevil
(16 items)
 
ASUS G750JM
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
[i7 4790K @ 4.4 GHz (1.186v)] [Asus Sabertooth Z97 Mark S] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
[G.Skill 32GB DDR3 2133 MHz] [Crucial MX100 256GB] [Phanteks PH-TC12DX] [Win 10.1 Pro] 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
[LG 29UM65 (2560x1080)] [QNIX Evo II LED (2560x1440)] [WASD v2 Tenkeyless] [NZXT Hale90 v2 ] 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
[ThermalTake GT10 Snow Edition] [Razer Mamba - Chroma] [Razer Kabuto] [Razer Man O' War] 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770HQ Intel HM87 Express Chipset Geforce GTX 860M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD EVO DVD-RW Stock Windows 8.1 
Monitor
1920x1080 TN 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [[H]ardOCP] AMD 6970/6950 CFX and NVIDIA 580/570 SLI Review