Originally Posted by Setzer
Comparing Crysis 2 to Avatar just shows what the quality of the game is gonna be like......
Avatar = the leader of CG graphics and the technology that goes with it
Crysis = the leader of gaming graphics and the technology that goes with it
Why shouldn't one be allowed to compare them?
and crytek claims that the 3D wont loose much performance.
Because I think that the 3D in Crysis isn't going to be real 3D. I think it's going to be some cheap, dinky overlay unlike all the actual 3D content out there is.
How else are they putting 3D on the Xbox 360? The 360 hardware is not capable of 3D, and I'm not saying that to hate on the 360. It just can't! It's HDMI is too outdated and it doesn't contain any of the necessary technology to go with it. Yet, Crytek has some kind of magic abilities to do it on the 360. Sounds to me like an overlay stereoscopic filter. And if they're claiming that the 3D on the PC won't loose alot of performance: must be the same situation on the PC and possibly PS3 as well. I could be wrong about that (on the PC and PS3) but that's the case with the 360.Edited by OmegaNemesis28 - 1/14/11 at 1:38pm