Originally Posted by EK_tiborrr
And when owners are cheesed off at your company you don't do yourselves any favors. The way to regain product credibility is by inviting your critics to review not people who've never reviewed your products in the past.
I am not even going to be replying on this one since it's utter lie. A lie told a thousand times is still a lie. We've sent out numerous samples of water blocks and only got ~ 1/3 of all reviews published (talking about reliable 'reviewers'). We gave the blocks just about to anyone. This is now the second time I have to say this and will not say again but simply ignore.
I have been comparing EK-Supreme HF and EK-Supremacy samples for three months prior to release. We did two different approaches for EK-Supremacy and both were better than EK-Supreme HF. My thumbs got literally ruined by the constant mounting and demounting of the water blocks. First on the CPU simulator, then on the real CPU.
Mind you I have measuring equipment and testing methodology at least on par with Martin.
A fresh reviews, a comparion of EK latest CPU water block offerings:
P.S.: If you still believe Supreme HF is better than Supremacy that's fine by me. If you are not convinced by number then my words will also not convince you. I also have a couple of EK-Supreme HF samples in CSQ design in cased anyone is interested
Niko apparently there is a language barrier that we cannot seem to overcome.
You're telling me that only 1/3 of the reviewers agreed to review Supremacy? And that they compared the previous two EK HF blocks to Supremacy?
I'm not sure I buy that because the Reviewer you linked here doesn't have the numbers for v1 or v2. Only supremacy.
I didn't ask for that. I asked for YOUR numbers. And no I am not asking about mounting. Your own words, you state that you worked tirelessly to make sure that Supremacy fit all platforms. That's not the same as comparing Idle or Load Temps from one block to the next on a similar testing platform. This is all I'm asking for.
I'm willing to believe you but you're not inspiring confidence here. I viewed your second link and by the third page the link starts jumping as though I clicked an ad. So I can't even tell what you did or did not do or achieve from your results.
This is what I'm asking you for though. I'm not out to get EK. My only interest lies in the truth. I did ask you before for the numbers. And either you missed it or you ignored me off hand because you think that I have an issue with EK. My only issue with EK at the moment is the CSQ issue and the shoddy way EK handled the Nickel issue. But that's the past and I'm willing to put it away.
I'm the last guy you want to discount here. I like my EK gear. I'm probably one of the few people that gave your company the Benefit of Doubt when everyone was openly calling for Eddy's head or inciting hate and discontent. So believe me when I say this... you don't want me in a bad mood with your company. I've worked in Automotive Counter Parts Sales and Sales in general for over 15 years. I've held parts that cost ten times the cost of one of your blocks and I don't get offended easily and I look at all sides with equal measure.
So I invite you to try again and do please provide the information I requested. Doing so is good for your company is it not? You can dismiss me if you wish but that would be a mistake.
The first link that you posted is Fail. The only EK block tested is Supremacy. That wasn't the issue at all.