Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › SSD For Just Windows 7
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

SSD For Just Windows 7 - Page 4

post #31 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdrdrdrd View Post
go for 2 of the 16 gb and RAID 0, should be pretty fast
how would that compare to just one 64GB C300
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[AMD] Phenom II x4 955 C2 @ 3.6GHz 1.385v [Biostar] TA890FXE (NB @ 2400MHz 1.25v) [MSI] GTX 560 Ti TFII GE @ 1000/2000/2100 1.087v [OCZ] 4GB Gold Series DDR3 1333MHZ 9-9-9-20 2T 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
[WD] 320GB SATA II HDD [Windows] 7 Home Premium 64bit [ASUS] VE248H 1920x1080 60Hz 2MS LED [Logitech] K120 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
[Corsair] CMPSU-850TX 850W [ThermalTake] Armor (Ryūjin Case Mod) [Steelseries] Xai [Steelseries] QCK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[AMD] Phenom II x4 955 C2 @ 3.6GHz 1.385v [Biostar] TA890FXE (NB @ 2400MHz 1.25v) [MSI] GTX 560 Ti TFII GE @ 1000/2000/2100 1.087v [OCZ] 4GB Gold Series DDR3 1333MHZ 9-9-9-20 2T 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
[WD] 320GB SATA II HDD [Windows] 7 Home Premium 64bit [ASUS] VE248H 1920x1080 60Hz 2MS LED [Logitech] K120 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
[Corsair] CMPSU-850TX 850W [ThermalTake] Armor (Ryūjin Case Mod) [Steelseries] Xai [Steelseries] QCK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
post #32 of 36
After digging in a bit to the Corsair F40, If you want max speed all around the F40 is a great buy. However if you're not too concerned with write speed and want great read speed with a bit extra storage compared to the F40 and still all around fast the C300 64GB model is a great buy.

I'll throw in I sure don't write as much as I read from my SSD so the lower write speed doesn't bother me one bit on the Crucial C300.
D
(15 items)
 
The Sheep Skinner
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 6700 Gigabyte Z170N-Gaming5 Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X 3840 G.Skill TridentZ  
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
960 EVO 500GB EK SE 240mm, Magicool slim 240mm EK Supreme HF CU Gold EKFC-Fury X WB 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Win 10 Pro Acer XG270HU EVGA 750W  Evolv ITX 
MouseMouse Pad
Naos7000 Corsair MM600 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2D E8400 DFI LT P35 Radeon HD4890 OCZ 2GB 800MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500GB Asus multi DVD W7 U Samsung 2232BW+ 
PowerCase
Corsair HX520W CM 690 
  hide details  
Reply
D
(15 items)
 
The Sheep Skinner
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 6700 Gigabyte Z170N-Gaming5 Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X 3840 G.Skill TridentZ  
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
960 EVO 500GB EK SE 240mm, Magicool slim 240mm EK Supreme HF CU Gold EKFC-Fury X WB 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Win 10 Pro Acer XG270HU EVGA 750W  Evolv ITX 
MouseMouse Pad
Naos7000 Corsair MM600 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2D E8400 DFI LT P35 Radeon HD4890 OCZ 2GB 800MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500GB Asus multi DVD W7 U Samsung 2232BW+ 
PowerCase
Corsair HX520W CM 690 
  hide details  
Reply
post #33 of 36
It would be less space and cost more then a single 64GB SSD
post #34 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rx7racer View Post
After digging in a bit to the Corsair F40, If you want max speed all around the F40 is a great buy. However if you're not too concerned with write speed and want great read speed with a bit extra storage compared to the F40 and still all around fast the C300 64GB model is a great buy.

I'll throw in I sure don't write as much as I read from my SSD so the lower write speed doesn't bother me one bit on the Crucial C300.
true, I use my storage space for way more read then write. +1 rep to everyone that helped..
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[AMD] Phenom II x4 955 C2 @ 3.6GHz 1.385v [Biostar] TA890FXE (NB @ 2400MHz 1.25v) [MSI] GTX 560 Ti TFII GE @ 1000/2000/2100 1.087v [OCZ] 4GB Gold Series DDR3 1333MHZ 9-9-9-20 2T 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
[WD] 320GB SATA II HDD [Windows] 7 Home Premium 64bit [ASUS] VE248H 1920x1080 60Hz 2MS LED [Logitech] K120 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
[Corsair] CMPSU-850TX 850W [ThermalTake] Armor (Ryūjin Case Mod) [Steelseries] Xai [Steelseries] QCK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[AMD] Phenom II x4 955 C2 @ 3.6GHz 1.385v [Biostar] TA890FXE (NB @ 2400MHz 1.25v) [MSI] GTX 560 Ti TFII GE @ 1000/2000/2100 1.087v [OCZ] 4GB Gold Series DDR3 1333MHZ 9-9-9-20 2T 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
[WD] 320GB SATA II HDD [Windows] 7 Home Premium 64bit [ASUS] VE248H 1920x1080 60Hz 2MS LED [Logitech] K120 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
[Corsair] CMPSU-850TX 850W [ThermalTake] Armor (Ryūjin Case Mod) [Steelseries] Xai [Steelseries] QCK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
post #35 of 36
it would be more expensive and smaller, but would have 2 times (theoretically) the r/w speed of the individual disks, but that is a great deal for $100
The Nvidorator
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 760 @ 4.0 ASUS P7P55D-E ASUS GTX570 8GB Corsiar 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSPower
1 TB western Digital black SAMSUNG Black Blu-ray Drive Win 7 64bit Ultimate Corsiar 750W 
Case
Storm Sniper Black 
  hide details  
Reply
The Nvidorator
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 760 @ 4.0 ASUS P7P55D-E ASUS GTX570 8GB Corsiar 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSPower
1 TB western Digital black SAMSUNG Black Blu-ray Drive Win 7 64bit Ultimate Corsiar 750W 
Case
Storm Sniper Black 
  hide details  
Reply
post #36 of 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdrdrdrd View Post
it would be more expensive and smaller, but would have 2 times (theoretically) the r/w speed of the individual disks, but that is a great deal for $100
16GB drives are much slower than the newer drives available - you will not even match the performance of a single $100 64GB C300, let alone exceed it, even with the added expense and complications of RAID.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hard Drives & Storage
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › SSD For Just Windows 7