Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › Is Bulldozer going to fail vs Sandy Bridge?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Is Bulldozer going to fail vs Sandy Bridge? - Page 16  

Poll Results: Is Bulldozer going to fail vs Sandy Bridge?

 
  • 32% (289)
    Yes, it will.-
  • 67% (606)
    No, I don't think so...
895 Total Votes  
post #151 of 616
see below...
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
post #152 of 616
Let me ask my crystal globe that knows all....

...Yes...no.....maybe. Even the globe doesn't know.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I5 2500k @4.2 P67A-GD80(B3 revision) MSI R6970 MSI 16GB Kingston HyperX 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Seagate 1 Terrible bite Windows 7 64bit Pro 27" inch Acer LED 1920x1080 Logitech G15 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair TX850watt Corsair T600 Logitech MX desk 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I5 2500k @4.2 P67A-GD80(B3 revision) MSI R6970 MSI 16GB Kingston HyperX 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Seagate 1 Terrible bite Windows 7 64bit Pro 27" inch Acer LED 1920x1080 Logitech G15 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair TX850watt Corsair T600 Logitech MX desk 
  hide details  
post #153 of 616
post# 147, 148, 149

That's how I feel too.

Purpleannex
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k Z68 Extreme4gen3 Gainward GTX 470 @ 740Mhz 8GB Mushkin Blackline LV (2x4GB) DDR3 1600MHz 9... 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
128GB Crucial M225 SSD 2 x 500gb 500GbB samsung 500GbB samsung Samsung SH-B083L 8x BD Combo 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 7 64-bit LG W2486L LED 24" 1080p Antech True power new 750W FT-02 B-W 
  hide details  
Purpleannex
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k Z68 Extreme4gen3 Gainward GTX 470 @ 740Mhz 8GB Mushkin Blackline LV (2x4GB) DDR3 1600MHz 9... 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
128GB Crucial M225 SSD 2 x 500gb 500GbB samsung 500GbB samsung Samsung SH-B083L 8x BD Combo 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 7 64-bit LG W2486L LED 24" 1080p Antech True power new 750W FT-02 B-W 
  hide details  
post #154 of 616
Supposedly, AMD has been working on "reverse multi-threading" for the past couple years, to eventually win out against Intel. So if you could run one thread on multiple cores, i think it would win out against intel on higher core numbers, since games and programs really only make use of a few cores at the moment.
Arcturus
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 4690k @ 4.4ghz Asrock Z97 Pro4 Sapphire R9 390 G.Skill Sniper 2133mhz 8gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 Evo 250gb WD Blue - 1Tb Mirrored Hyper 212 Evo Windows 8.1 
PowerCaseAudioAudio
XFX TS 650w Corsair Carbide 200r Fiio E10/E9 Stack AKG Q701 
Audio
Grado SR325e 
  hide details  
Arcturus
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 4690k @ 4.4ghz Asrock Z97 Pro4 Sapphire R9 390 G.Skill Sniper 2133mhz 8gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 Evo 250gb WD Blue - 1Tb Mirrored Hyper 212 Evo Windows 8.1 
PowerCaseAudioAudio
XFX TS 650w Corsair Carbide 200r Fiio E10/E9 Stack AKG Q701 
Audio
Grado SR325e 
  hide details  
post #155 of 616
I hope not. Intel really needs some competition in this market, and AMD's the only company that can really offer it.
post #156 of 616
Currently, there are other companies trying their hand in other areas than x86-64.

Even if AMD fails as a company Intel will still find completion because some new guy is always ready to step up to fill that void with tax breaks.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
post #157 of 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by nagle3092 View Post
This, I love AMD but until they get back into the performance game I'm sticking with Intel.
What I dont get is they are so confident with their APU they taunt intel, they call out nVidia with the 6990 vs 590 but still nothing about Bulldozer. If it was going to beat SB I think we would have known it by now. I hope Im wrong because competition is always good for the consumer and at this point there is none for high end cpus.
AMD called out nVidia about the 590 after both cards were released. How is that in any way relevant to an unreleased cpu?
post #158 of 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by mexer View Post
Yes definately Buldozer fail against Sandy Bridge same as AMD always fail against Intel, maybe bulldozer get same performance like i7 960, but no chance to get or even beat THE KING OF TODAY CPU- i7- 2600K !!! Only cpu which beat 2600k will be Ivy Bridge it will be definately beast, becouse Intel really dont have competition, he is monopol in CPU, only competitor for Intel is Intel himself.
trololol
Quote:
Originally Posted by TickleMeElmo View Post
The problem is that even if BD does take the performance crown, it will likely be overtaken a couple months later by Sandy Bridge E
1. it depends how much you want pay for it... (SB-EN)
2. LGA 1356 6-8 cores .. do you people think these will clock higher than LGA1155 ? no
Edited by pietro sk - 4/16/11 at 4:21pm
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 6386SE G34r1 H8SGL Radeon R9 380X 32GB ECC_DDR3 1333 4ch 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Seagate 600 Pro Enterprise SSD WD Green+Black some water Win8.1_64 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
K120 TX850 Tai-chi M560 
AudioAudio
Xmos_u8_DAC; (diy Pluto 2A3/SE estat amp) STAX cookies 3pcs 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 6386SE G34r1 H8SGL Radeon R9 380X 32GB ECC_DDR3 1333 4ch 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Seagate 600 Pro Enterprise SSD WD Green+Black some water Win8.1_64 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
K120 TX850 Tai-chi M560 
AudioAudio
Xmos_u8_DAC; (diy Pluto 2A3/SE estat amp) STAX cookies 3pcs 
  hide details  
post #159 of 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostmage View Post
Supposedly, AMD has been working on "reverse multi-threading" for the past couple years, to eventually win out against Intel. So if you could run one thread on multiple cores, i think it would win out against intel on higher core numbers, since games and programs really only make use of a few cores at the moment.
That was just rumors people were spreading when they initially heard about the module design.
3930k
(20 items)
 
  
3930k
(20 items)
 
  
post #160 of 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by pietro sk View Post
trololol


1. it depends how much you want pay for it... (SB-EN)
2. LGA 1356 6-8 cores .. do you people think these will clock higher than LGA1155 ? no
No, why would they?

They offer 2 - 4 more cores than current chips with the exact same design. Current SB chips offer performance at prices nothing can touch, not the 1055t nor the 980x. Neither of those two chips are on par with Sandy Bridge.

That said we still haven't seen what bulldozer can do, and everyone here from AMD to Intel users and people like myself who buy whatever is best in my price range are watching AMD to see if its going to be another 6 years of low end "budget" chips.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › Is Bulldozer going to fail vs Sandy Bridge?