Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › [fake]GTX 590 first benchmark results
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[fake]GTX 590 first benchmark results

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Open1Your1Eyes0 View Post
I hate to burst everyone's bubble but these are fake, the source "hardware reviewer" OBRovsky is laughing at XtremeSystems: Link.

This is clearly obvious because dual stock clocked GTX580's get 69FPS AVG with Enthusiast settings (and that's only with 2X AA). It is pretty much impossible for a GTX590 (which is dual underclocked GTX580's) to get an AVG of 83FPS (especially at 16xQ AA).

A troll has caught us again.
From softpedia.com
Quote:
It seems like the very first samples of Nvidia's GTX 590 graphics cards have already reached hardware reviewers and enthusiasts as some early benchmark results of the dual-GPU solution have already been leaked, detailing its Crysis performance.

The screenshot of the Framebuffer Crysis benchmark Tool has been posted by a Czech blogger that goes by the name of OBRovsky and has come to our attention via the XtremeSystems forum.

Nvidia's GTX 590 was tested using a six-core Intel Core i7 980X processor, that was clocked at 3575MHz, together with an un-named Gigabyte X58 motherboard while the Crysis benchmark was run using the Ambush map at a 1920x1080 resolution with 16x anti-aliasing using the Extreme quality profile and the DirectX 10 render path.

The results speak for themselves as the GTX 590 managed to render, in average, 83.61 frames each second while the minimum frame rate recorded was that of 57.59fps.

No other details were provided together with this quick benchmark, but, from previous leaks, we do know that the GTX 590 will feature dual GF110 GPUs that are paired together on the same printed circuit board and connected via SLI.

The GPU's used will be hand selected from the GF110 cores that are manufactured over at TSMC and the board could pack as much as 1024 stream processors, 128 texturing units, 96 ROPs as well as dual 384-bit memory interfaces. These will be connected to 3072MB of video frame buffer.
They've got results from the Framebuffer Crysis benchmark Tool. Not bad if its real.




Edited by remer - 3/3/11 at 2:16pm
space heater
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 @ 3.6 EVGA X58 SLI Micro ASUS GTX 590 @ 690/1380/3600 G.SKILL 12GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
128GB M225 SSD & 4x2TB raid5 Win 7 Ult x64 Acer HN274H 27" 120Hz 3D CORSAIR AX850 
Case
Antec Mini P180 
  hide details  
Reply
space heater
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 @ 3.6 EVGA X58 SLI Micro ASUS GTX 590 @ 690/1380/3600 G.SKILL 12GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
128GB M225 SSD & 4x2TB raid5 Win 7 Ult x64 Acer HN274H 27" 120Hz 3D CORSAIR AX850 
Case
Antec Mini P180 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 19
so it's 2 underclocked 580s? I wonder what the heat and power consumptions are o.o

Can't wait for reviews.
post #3 of 19
Those are some pretty numbers there on the Crysis benchmark.
Animal Mother
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 2600k 4.5Ghz 1.368v  Gigabyte Z68X UD3H B3 ver. 1.3 MSI GTX 780 Ti Twin Frozr IV @ 1180Mhz 16GB Kingston Hyperx Savage 1600Mhz 9.9.9.27 1.5v 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Kingston UV400 240GB SSD, WD 3x640GB, 1TB & 3TB  Noctua NHU12P SE2 w/ KAZE 1200RPM & 1800RPM Windows 10 x64 Samsung P2450H 24" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Redragon Karuna Corsair TX750W V2 Cooler Master 690 II Advanced Redragon Pegasus 
Mouse PadAudio
SteelSeries QcK XFi Gamer Fatality Pro + Plantronics Gamecom 777 
  hide details  
Reply
Animal Mother
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 2600k 4.5Ghz 1.368v  Gigabyte Z68X UD3H B3 ver. 1.3 MSI GTX 780 Ti Twin Frozr IV @ 1180Mhz 16GB Kingston Hyperx Savage 1600Mhz 9.9.9.27 1.5v 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Kingston UV400 240GB SSD, WD 3x640GB, 1TB & 3TB  Noctua NHU12P SE2 w/ KAZE 1200RPM & 1800RPM Windows 10 x64 Samsung P2450H 24" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Redragon Karuna Corsair TX750W V2 Cooler Master 690 II Advanced Redragon Pegasus 
Mouse PadAudio
SteelSeries QcK XFi Gamer Fatality Pro + Plantronics Gamecom 777 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 19
Wasn't it suppose to be 3 gigs not 1.5?
post #5 of 19
Nice!
It's TURBO TIME!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i5 2500k] [AsRock Z77 Pro 4] [ATI 5770] [16GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1333][7-7-7-21@1.5v] 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
[OCZ Agility 3 120GB] [Corsair H-60] [Windows 7 Ultimate x64] [22in Asus 2ms 1920x1080] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
daskeyboard [SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W] [NZXT M59] Razer DeathAdder 
  hide details  
Reply
It's TURBO TIME!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i5 2500k] [AsRock Z77 Pro 4] [ATI 5770] [16GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1333][7-7-7-21@1.5v] 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
[OCZ Agility 3 120GB] [Corsair H-60] [Windows 7 Ultimate x64] [22in Asus 2ms 1920x1080] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
daskeyboard [SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W] [NZXT M59] Razer DeathAdder 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 19
Wait, only 1.5gb of ram total? NoooooO!!!!
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 3570K Asus P8Z77M-Pro Sapphire 7970 Mushkin DDR3 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingOS
Crucial M4 Thermalright HR-02 Macho Accelero Xtreme Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell 3007WFP-HC Deck Legend Ice Tactile Corsair AX650 Silverstone TJ08-E 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech G500 SteelSeries QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 3570K Asus P8Z77M-Pro Sapphire 7970 Mushkin DDR3 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingOS
Crucial M4 Thermalright HR-02 Macho Accelero Xtreme Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell 3007WFP-HC Deck Legend Ice Tactile Corsair AX650 Silverstone TJ08-E 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech G500 SteelSeries QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebolamonkey3 View Post
Wait, only 1.5gb of ram total? NoooooO!!!!
Per core.
It's TURBO TIME!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i5 2500k] [AsRock Z77 Pro 4] [ATI 5770] [16GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1333][7-7-7-21@1.5v] 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
[OCZ Agility 3 120GB] [Corsair H-60] [Windows 7 Ultimate x64] [22in Asus 2ms 1920x1080] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
daskeyboard [SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W] [NZXT M59] Razer DeathAdder 
  hide details  
Reply
It's TURBO TIME!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i5 2500k] [AsRock Z77 Pro 4] [ATI 5770] [16GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1333][7-7-7-21@1.5v] 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
[OCZ Agility 3 120GB] [Corsair H-60] [Windows 7 Ultimate x64] [22in Asus 2ms 1920x1080] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
daskeyboard [SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W] [NZXT M59] Razer DeathAdder 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alchemik View Post
Wasn't it suppose to be 3 gigs not 1.5?
I think thats only for one of the two gpus. So it's 2x1.5GB.

I'm made up my my mind to get one instead of waiting for kepler as long as its less than $800. I've only got one slot for a graphics card because of the micro atx board with the other slot taken by my raid card. Otherwise i would go with a two card sli solution.
space heater
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 @ 3.6 EVGA X58 SLI Micro ASUS GTX 590 @ 690/1380/3600 G.SKILL 12GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
128GB M225 SSD & 4x2TB raid5 Win 7 Ult x64 Acer HN274H 27" 120Hz 3D CORSAIR AX850 
Case
Antec Mini P180 
  hide details  
Reply
space heater
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 @ 3.6 EVGA X58 SLI Micro ASUS GTX 590 @ 690/1380/3600 G.SKILL 12GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
128GB M225 SSD & 4x2TB raid5 Win 7 Ult x64 Acer HN274H 27" 120Hz 3D CORSAIR AX850 
Case
Antec Mini P180 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 19
That looks like a 32bit OS. Wha?
post #10 of 19
11/17/2010????
Mighty-iTX
(12 items)
 
One foot in..
(17 items)
 
mATX
(12 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4770K M7-Impact Strix GTX980 Samsung 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 256 Glacer 240L W8.1 K272HUL 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Seasonic X-650 Prodigy MX518 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
4770K/45/43 Maximus VI Extreme R290X R290X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung Crucial M4 64GB RAIDR LSSWM 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Cooler Master Glacer 7 Ultimate 64 SyncMaster Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
XFX 1050 BE 600T Silver MX518 Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4330 Z87 Gryphon GTX690 G.Skill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Blacks Hyper 212 W8.1 ACER 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Ultra X3 1000w Corsair 230T Orange Razer 
  hide details  
Reply
Mighty-iTX
(12 items)
 
One foot in..
(17 items)
 
mATX
(12 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4770K M7-Impact Strix GTX980 Samsung 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Crucial M4 256 Glacer 240L W8.1 K272HUL 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Saitek Seasonic X-650 Prodigy MX518 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
4770K/45/43 Maximus VI Extreme R290X R290X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung Crucial M4 64GB RAIDR LSSWM 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Cooler Master Glacer 7 Ultimate 64 SyncMaster Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
XFX 1050 BE 600T Silver MX518 Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4330 Z87 Gryphon GTX690 G.Skill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Blacks Hyper 212 W8.1 ACER 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Ultra X3 1000w Corsair 230T Orange Razer 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: NVIDIA
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › [fake]GTX 590 first benchmark results