Originally Posted by De-Zant
I think he's serious.
Because? Because I share his opinion. The crysis 2 demo looks great. The visual style of the game looks more "realistic" than crysis 1, and doesn't pop out the same way. However, I prefer it. Crysis 1 is still more impressive, but I'd rather play a game with crysis 2 visuals (but I'd prefer a higher FOV)
Don't get on the bandwagon of "OH NOZ!!! DX9! It's a console port!!!"
Face it, the demo doesn't look bad at all. It may not be crysis 1 but it still looks great.
but there are several things that crysis 1 did better:
aaaaand thats it.
im not saying the demo doesnt look great, it has some very nice texures and lighting features. i mean, look at this:
compared to DX10 crysis:
you gotta admit thats pretty damn good for DX9!
if crysis 1 had cryengine3's lighting/bloom effects, HUD style (looks more 'realistic') and gun sway, it would be INCREDIBLE!!!
still, DX11 tessellated water and tiles would be nice
cant wait to see how the real deal will use those technologies!