Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Anand] Correction: OCZ Vertex 3 Random Read Performance Data
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Anand] Correction: OCZ Vertex 3 Random Read Performance Data - Page 2

post #11 of 17
Thread Starter 
For someone who's looking to buy one of these next gen 25nm MLC SSDs, it's looking like Crucial is going to remain as king with their C400.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
Yup, but an improvement over SandForce SF-1200...

[Your title should somewhat match the article title]
Sry, I'll remember that for next time.
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 1800x ASUS ROG Crosshair Hero VI (Wi-Fi AC) EVGA GeForce 1070 FTW Hybrid 2x16GB G.Skilll Ripjaws-V 3200mhz 14-14-14-34 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung PRO 960 512GB Corsair H110i Windows 10 Pro x64 3x 1440p Samsung SyncMaster SA850 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
DAS Keyboard MX Blue EVGA 750 G2 Corsair Obsidian 750D Logitech G502 
Mouse PadAudioOther
Razer Goliath ASUS Xonar D2X Cyberpower 1500PFCLCD UPS 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 920 D0 - 3.6GHz @1.27v Asus P6T SE Gigabyte Radeon R9 290 OC @ 1075Mhz 24GB Corsair Vengeance Triple Channel DDR3 1600... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 840 120GB (+8.5TB Storage) LG Super-Multi DVD-RW Noctua NH-U12P Windows 10 x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung UN60J6200 60" LED TV Logitech K830 Corsair TX750 Antec 900 
MouseAudioAudioOther
Microsoft Arc Touch Mouse Yamaha RX-A810 Receiver 5.1 Klipsh Speakers / Polk Subwoofer Fan Controller + Scythe UK3000s 
  hide details  
Reply
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 1800x ASUS ROG Crosshair Hero VI (Wi-Fi AC) EVGA GeForce 1070 FTW Hybrid 2x16GB G.Skilll Ripjaws-V 3200mhz 14-14-14-34 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung PRO 960 512GB Corsair H110i Windows 10 Pro x64 3x 1440p Samsung SyncMaster SA850 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
DAS Keyboard MX Blue EVGA 750 G2 Corsair Obsidian 750D Logitech G502 
Mouse PadAudioOther
Razer Goliath ASUS Xonar D2X Cyberpower 1500PFCLCD UPS 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 920 D0 - 3.6GHz @1.27v Asus P6T SE Gigabyte Radeon R9 290 OC @ 1075Mhz 24GB Corsair Vengeance Triple Channel DDR3 1600... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 840 120GB (+8.5TB Storage) LG Super-Multi DVD-RW Noctua NH-U12P Windows 10 x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung UN60J6200 60" LED TV Logitech K830 Corsair TX750 Antec 900 
MouseAudioAudioOther
Microsoft Arc Touch Mouse Yamaha RX-A810 Receiver 5.1 Klipsh Speakers / Polk Subwoofer Fan Controller + Scythe UK3000s 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by FtL1776 View Post
Anandtech seems to have different benchmarks then the rest, the C300 has always seemed to be the top of everything on theirs, then on multiple others Vertex 2 was at the top.
Well, now the C300 is on top for random read performance, and the Vertex 3 is on top for every other
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6300 @ 2.56ghz ASUS P5B Deluxe Wi-Fi/AP X850XT 2gb Crucial 10th Anniversary @4-4-4-12/? 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x Seagate 7200.10 320gb Lite-On 165H6S, NEC ND-3550 1. Vista Ultimate 64-bit, 2. Windows XP Pro/SP2 Samsung SyncMaster 914v 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Standard OCZ GameXStream 700w Logitech Area 51 (Black) Microsoft Habu 
Mouse Pad
Who uses these wtf? 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6300 @ 2.56ghz ASUS P5B Deluxe Wi-Fi/AP X850XT 2gb Crucial 10th Anniversary @4-4-4-12/? 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x Seagate 7200.10 320gb Lite-On 165H6S, NEC ND-3550 1. Vista Ultimate 64-bit, 2. Windows XP Pro/SP2 Samsung SyncMaster 914v 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Standard OCZ GameXStream 700w Logitech Area 51 (Black) Microsoft Habu 
Mouse Pad
Who uses these wtf? 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 17
actually anandatech hates C300s, he even talked **** about them before they were released, say they perform terrible without TRIM, which is an outright LIE, hes a liar that ananda guy. We even told him to change his **** with proof.
X99 Main Rig
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 5960X Extreme Edition @ 4.5GHz Always Changing VisonTek R9 290 G.Skill Ripjaws 4 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 @ 3200MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 128GB M.2 PCI-E 4x SSD Apotop 256GB SSD 1.82TB NAS Noctua NH-D15 with both fans 
OSPower
Win7 Pro Enermax 1000W 
  hide details  
Reply
X99 Main Rig
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 5960X Extreme Edition @ 4.5GHz Always Changing VisonTek R9 290 G.Skill Ripjaws 4 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 @ 3200MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 128GB M.2 PCI-E 4x SSD Apotop 256GB SSD 1.82TB NAS Noctua NH-D15 with both fans 
OSPower
Win7 Pro Enermax 1000W 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 17
Their test model is still using the 32nm NAND memory right? Where as the actual production will use 25nm which will be slightly slower in every area. Plus having fewer p/e cycles. Anand says the Micron memory has 3000 but can we be 100% sure it's not even lower since 32nm is only at 3700?
Edited by PoopaScoopa - 3/5/11 at 2:10pm
post #15 of 17
How are the random reads compared to an X25-M?
My System
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7-7700k Asus Maximus IX Hero EVGA GTX 1080 Ti 16GB Corsair Vengeance LED 3200 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 960 Evo NVme Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB Mushkin Chronos 480GB Toshiba 1TB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 x64 Pro Dell S2716DG 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsair K90 Corsair AX850 NZXT S340 Elite White Steelseries Rival 
Mouse PadAudio
Razer Goliathus Asus Xonar STX 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7-7700k Asus Maximus IX Hero EVGA GTX 1080 Ti 16GB Corsair Vengeance LED 3200 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 960 Evo NVme Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB Mushkin Chronos 480GB Toshiba 1TB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 x64 Pro Dell S2716DG 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsair K90 Corsair AX850 NZXT S340 Elite White Steelseries Rival 
Mouse PadAudio
Razer Goliathus Asus Xonar STX 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outcasst View Post
How are the random reads compared to an X25-M?
Worse at low QD, better at high QD. So not really worth it for a 24/7 system.
post #17 of 17
It's good when people correct their mistakes when they mess up I like that.
It's TURBO TIME!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i5 2500k] [AsRock Z77 Pro 4] [ATI 5770] [16GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1333][7-7-7-21@1.5v] 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
[OCZ Agility 3 120GB] [Corsair H-60] [Windows 7 Ultimate x64] [22in Asus 2ms 1920x1080] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
daskeyboard [SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W] [NZXT M59] Razer DeathAdder 
  hide details  
Reply
It's TURBO TIME!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i5 2500k] [AsRock Z77 Pro 4] [ATI 5770] [16GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1333][7-7-7-21@1.5v] 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
[OCZ Agility 3 120GB] [Corsair H-60] [Windows 7 Ultimate x64] [22in Asus 2ms 1920x1080] 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
daskeyboard [SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W] [NZXT M59] Razer DeathAdder 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Anand] Correction: OCZ Vertex 3 Random Read Performance Data