Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › [ConceivablyTech] Firefox 4 RC Vs. IE9 RC: The First Duel
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[ConceivablyTech] Firefox 4 RC Vs. IE9 RC: The First Duel

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
Source: http://www.conceivablytech.com/
Quote:

All right. Take the 14:15 result for IE9 with a grain of salt. There are plenty of benchmarks out there that cater to the individual strengths of browsers and if you wanted Mozilla to win, you surely can set it up that way. We haven’t set this benchmark up with that result in mind and it does not matter anyway. Firefox 4 and IE9 are substantially upgraded browsers when compared to their predecessors and show few weaknesses in any benchmark. It is somewhat obvious that Firefox has a great JavaScript engine, while it is apparent that IE9′s greatest potential lies in hardware acceleration. IE9′s hardware acceleration engine is the one to beat today.
post #2 of 10
1.73 flash text (fps) that jumps to 26.95 seconds with a simple hardware UPGRADE?

Please excuse me while I nullify all of these results.
Ivypascal
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3570K, 4.6 GHz @ 1.29V Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H eVGA GTX1080 ACX SC 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Crucial M4SSD2 SATA III (128GB) Windows 10 Pro x64 Viewsonic XG2703-GS & Dell 24' 07WFPHC CM Storm Quick Fire Rapid, MX Red 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair HX850 Coolermaster HAF 932 Logitech G502 
  hide details  
Reply
Ivypascal
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3570K, 4.6 GHz @ 1.29V Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H eVGA GTX1080 ACX SC 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Crucial M4SSD2 SATA III (128GB) Windows 10 Pro x64 Viewsonic XG2703-GS & Dell 24' 07WFPHC CM Storm Quick Fire Rapid, MX Red 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair HX850 Coolermaster HAF 932 Logitech G502 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celeras View Post
1.73 flash text (fps) that jumps to 26.95 seconds with a simple hardware UPGRADE?

Please excuse me while I nullify all of these results.
It is probably a typographical error (21.73 instead of 1.73).
post #4 of 10
Even if ie9 won every single test I wouldnt switch from firefox to it. Simply because of the addons that firefox has available and how good they are. <3 noscript+ABP; but only the FF versions not chromes.
post #5 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celeras View Post
1.73 flash text (fps) that jumps to 26.95 seconds with a simple hardware UPGRADE?

Please excuse me while I nullify all of these results.
From my view it's just that flash now supports more threads
Since it IS comparing an i3 against a X6 after all.
Uhh.. Thing
(19 items)
 
TERA
(22 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4690K Z97-PRO GAMER ASUS STRIX GTX1070 Corsair Vengeance 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 830 Pro Samsung 850 EVO Samsung 830 Noctua D15 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 x64 Enterprise ASUS VG248QE QPAD MK-50 EVGA 750W G2 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Fractal Design R5 Logitech G502 Some Steelseries thing SupremeFX -> Pioneer VSX-D711-S 5.1 receiver 
AudioAudioOther
Dali Concept 2+SUB E-12F Focusrite Scarlett Solo Logitech G27 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 2700k @ 4.5GHz 1.425v with HT enabled ASUS P8Z77-V Gigabyte GTX670 OC Gigabyte GTX670 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Vengeanve LP White 16GB Corsair Force GT 120GB WD RED SOHO 3TB WD RED SOHO 3TB 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
WD BLACK 4TB Seagate 5900 LP 2TB XSPC Raystorm D5 XSPC RX480 w/ GT AP-13 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
XSPC RX360 w/ GT AP-15 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 DELL U3011 Logitech K800 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair HX1000W Corsair 900D Logitech G500 SARGAS 460 
AudioAudio
Denon AVR-2313 Dali Zensor 7, 5, Vocal 
  hide details  
Reply
Uhh.. Thing
(19 items)
 
TERA
(22 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4690K Z97-PRO GAMER ASUS STRIX GTX1070 Corsair Vengeance 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 830 Pro Samsung 850 EVO Samsung 830 Noctua D15 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 x64 Enterprise ASUS VG248QE QPAD MK-50 EVGA 750W G2 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Fractal Design R5 Logitech G502 Some Steelseries thing SupremeFX -> Pioneer VSX-D711-S 5.1 receiver 
AudioAudioOther
Dali Concept 2+SUB E-12F Focusrite Scarlett Solo Logitech G27 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 2700k @ 4.5GHz 1.425v with HT enabled ASUS P8Z77-V Gigabyte GTX670 OC Gigabyte GTX670 OC 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Vengeanve LP White 16GB Corsair Force GT 120GB WD RED SOHO 3TB WD RED SOHO 3TB 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
WD BLACK 4TB Seagate 5900 LP 2TB XSPC Raystorm D5 XSPC RX480 w/ GT AP-13 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
XSPC RX360 w/ GT AP-15 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 DELL U3011 Logitech K800 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair HX1000W Corsair 900D Logitech G500 SARGAS 460 
AudioAudio
Denon AVR-2313 Dali Zensor 7, 5, Vocal 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 10
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celeras View Post
1.73 flash text (fps) that jumps to 26.95 seconds with a simple hardware UPGRADE?

Please excuse me while I nullify all of these results.
Could have something to do with immature Intel IGP drivers (and thus, performance)...
post #7 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
Could have something to do with immature Intel IGP drivers (and thus, performance)...
Or it could be a typo.. more than likely its a typo. They probably meant 21.73 which makes sense
Needs More Red
(20 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3770k Asrock Z77 Extreme4 Gigabyte Windforce 290X OC 4GB Samsung DDR3-1600 Low Voltage 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
4GB Samsung DDR3-1600 Low Voltage 1TB Samsung F3 2TB Samsung F4 OCZ Agility 3 256GB 
Optical DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 24x DVD+-RW Lite-On 12x Bluray Burner Coolermaster Hyper 212 EVO Windows 8.1 Pro x64 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Yamakasi Catleap Q270 Antec TruePower 850W Thermaltake V4 Black Logitech G400s 
Mouse PadAudioAudio
Steelseries QCK Ultrasone Pro 900 Fiio E17 
  hide details  
Reply
Needs More Red
(20 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3770k Asrock Z77 Extreme4 Gigabyte Windforce 290X OC 4GB Samsung DDR3-1600 Low Voltage 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
4GB Samsung DDR3-1600 Low Voltage 1TB Samsung F3 2TB Samsung F4 OCZ Agility 3 256GB 
Optical DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 24x DVD+-RW Lite-On 12x Bluray Burner Coolermaster Hyper 212 EVO Windows 8.1 Pro x64 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Yamakasi Catleap Q270 Antec TruePower 850W Thermaltake V4 Black Logitech G400s 
Mouse PadAudioAudio
Steelseries QCK Ultrasone Pro 900 Fiio E17 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by s-x View Post
Even if ie9 won every single test I wouldnt switch from firefox to it. Simply because of the addons that firefox has available and how good they are. <3 noscript+ABP; but only the FF versions not chromes.
Both those addons have been available for IE since IE7...
post #9 of 10
I would have preferred if they compared it to Chrome, or even it's canary build
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3820 WC'd ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional Sapphire + Gigabyte R9 290X CF WC'd 16GB G. Skill Ripjaws Z 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
2x 3TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 RAID 1 2x 250GB Samsung 840 Series SSD RAID 1 Samsung Burner w/ Lightscribe Custom Watercooling 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Professional 64-bit 55" 4K Samsung Curved TV Roccat Sova Mechanical Cooler Master Silent Pro 1200W Gold 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Cooler Master HAF 922 w/ Dust Filters Roccat Kone XTD 2x XFX Warpad ODAC > Glow Amp One > K702/65 
AudioOther
Yamaha Receiver + 5.1 Xbox One Wireless Controller 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 540M @ 3.33Ghz DC 3.65Ghz SC Acer Intel HD 3000 + ATi Radeon HD 5650M Switchable 4GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorMouse
OCZ Vertex 2 SSD Windows 10 Pro 64 bit 13.3" 1366x768 G403 
Audio
iBasso D-Zero Headphone AMP + DAC 
  hide details  
Reply
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3820 WC'd ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional Sapphire + Gigabyte R9 290X CF WC'd 16GB G. Skill Ripjaws Z 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
2x 3TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 RAID 1 2x 250GB Samsung 840 Series SSD RAID 1 Samsung Burner w/ Lightscribe Custom Watercooling 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Professional 64-bit 55" 4K Samsung Curved TV Roccat Sova Mechanical Cooler Master Silent Pro 1200W Gold 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Cooler Master HAF 922 w/ Dust Filters Roccat Kone XTD 2x XFX Warpad ODAC > Glow Amp One > K702/65 
AudioOther
Yamaha Receiver + 5.1 Xbox One Wireless Controller 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 540M @ 3.33Ghz DC 3.65Ghz SC Acer Intel HD 3000 + ATi Radeon HD 5650M Switchable 4GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorMouse
OCZ Vertex 2 SSD Windows 10 Pro 64 bit 13.3" 1366x768 G403 
Audio
iBasso D-Zero Headphone AMP + DAC 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 10
Can anyone run the tests under Chrome 10+ with similar specced computer?
Shadow
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7920 DO 4.0/1.26V (191x21) Asus P6T MSI Twin Frozr III GTX570 Corsair 6GB DDR3/1600 Mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
128GB Falcon SSD / 1TB HDD Win 7 Pro Acer 22" Wide Razor Lycosa 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair 750w HAF 932 Wolfking Trooper Laser 2400DPI 
  hide details  
Reply
Shadow
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7920 DO 4.0/1.26V (191x21) Asus P6T MSI Twin Frozr III GTX570 Corsair 6GB DDR3/1600 Mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
128GB Falcon SSD / 1TB HDD Win 7 Pro Acer 22" Wide Razor Lycosa 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair 750w HAF 932 Wolfking Trooper Laser 2400DPI 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Software News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › [ConceivablyTech] Firefox 4 RC Vs. IE9 RC: The First Duel