Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [XBIT] AMD Aims to Fight Core i7 “Sandy Bridge” with Bulldozer.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[XBIT] AMD Aims to Fight Core i7 “Sandy Bridge” with Bulldozer. - Page 3

post #21 of 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lampen View Post
So with it saying 700$+ at the top of the chart are they trying to indicate the average price of a mobo/cpu/ram?
That is how I understood it.
post #22 of 300
I really hope this makes AMD competitive (performance wise) with sandy bridge, because I'm sure it'll be more than competitive price wise. As long as these show at least a decent improvement over the Phenom II series, I don't see why they wouldn't sell pretty well.
Betsy 2.1
(17 items)
 
Lappy
(7 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX 8350 @ 4.7 Gigabyte 970A-UD3 Gigabyte 290x OC 8gb DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung Spinpoint 1TB Samsung 840 SSD XSPC rasa EX360 Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 29UM67P Corsair K70 Corsair HX750 Corsair 600tse 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G9x Steelseries Steelseries Siberia V2 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i5-2450m gt540m 6gb 300gb 
CoolingOSKeyboard
stock Windows 7 stock backlit 
  hide details  
Reply
Betsy 2.1
(17 items)
 
Lappy
(7 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX 8350 @ 4.7 Gigabyte 970A-UD3 Gigabyte 290x OC 8gb DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung Spinpoint 1TB Samsung 840 SSD XSPC rasa EX360 Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 29UM67P Corsair K70 Corsair HX750 Corsair 600tse 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G9x Steelseries Steelseries Siberia V2 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i5-2450m gt540m 6gb 300gb 
CoolingOSKeyboard
stock Windows 7 stock backlit 
  hide details  
Reply
post #23 of 300
the impression I got from the chart was that bulldozer won't perform exactly up to par with sandy bridge clock for clock, but will make up for it with having twice as many cores for the price.

This probably won't transfer into games that well, but for number crunching performance like video rendering/processing, it should be really powerful. Hopefully it's good for games too, but time will tell
Yuki
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k @ 4.2 Ghz Asus P8P67-M Pro Gigabyte R9 290 16 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 840 EVO Western Digital Blue Hitachi Green Thermalright Venomous X Black 
OSKeyboardPowerCase
Windows 7 Professional 64 bit Novatouch Seasonic X-850 Gold Silverstone ft03 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Razer Deathadder Steelseries 5C Aune T1 
  hide details  
Reply
Yuki
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k @ 4.2 Ghz Asus P8P67-M Pro Gigabyte R9 290 16 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 840 EVO Western Digital Blue Hitachi Green Thermalright Venomous X Black 
OSKeyboardPowerCase
Windows 7 Professional 64 bit Novatouch Seasonic X-850 Gold Silverstone ft03 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Razer Deathadder Steelseries 5C Aune T1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #24 of 300
Im guessing the bulldozer chips will be priced very closely to SB, but the mobos will be cheaper. intel chipsets tend to be more expensive...
z87
(18 items)
 
Media Rig
(18 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II 720 ASRock 870 Extreme 3 HIS 5750 (840core/1200mem) 2*2GB A-Data DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 Seagate Barracuda ST3000DM001 Lite-On Blue Ray WH14NS40 Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 PRO 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 pro 64-bit Vizio M43-c1 Logitech K400 Corsair CX-430 
CaseMouseAudioAudio
NZXT Beta EVO Gigabyte M7700 Sony STR-DN1070 Definitive Technology BP8 Tower Speakers 
AudioAudio
Definitive Technology 2002 Series Center Speaker Definitive Technology ProMonitor 1000 Bookshelf... 
  hide details  
Reply
z87
(18 items)
 
Media Rig
(18 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II 720 ASRock 870 Extreme 3 HIS 5750 (840core/1200mem) 2*2GB A-Data DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 Seagate Barracuda ST3000DM001 Lite-On Blue Ray WH14NS40 Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 PRO 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 pro 64-bit Vizio M43-c1 Logitech K400 Corsair CX-430 
CaseMouseAudioAudio
NZXT Beta EVO Gigabyte M7700 Sony STR-DN1070 Definitive Technology BP8 Tower Speakers 
AudioAudio
Definitive Technology 2002 Series Center Speaker Definitive Technology ProMonitor 1000 Bookshelf... 
  hide details  
Reply
post #25 of 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Licht View Post
They don't have to win the fight with the first generation. They just need to get back in the game. The second generation of Bulldozer is supposed to be right around the corner at Q4 anyways. And we all remember how much better Phenom II was than the original right?
That was because the Phenom I had performance bugs and was built on 65nm.
Bulldozer should not have those issues and the "enriched" will remain on 32nm just like the first.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 5000 x2 Black Edition  BioStar 790GX 128M BFG 9800GT 1024 Mb 4x1 GB's of random thingies  
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
300GB Maxtor  Windows 7-U 64bit HP 19"  Logetech 
PowerCaseMouse
400 watt silver stone  Ultra Grid Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 5000 x2 Black Edition  BioStar 790GX 128M BFG 9800GT 1024 Mb 4x1 GB's of random thingies  
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
300GB Maxtor  Windows 7-U 64bit HP 19"  Logetech 
PowerCaseMouse
400 watt silver stone  Ultra Grid Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
post #26 of 300
read system price as the price of CPU. I was like, alright, I'm surely not going with bulldozer. xD
post #27 of 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by chronostorm View Post
the impression I got from the chart was that bulldozer won't perform exactly up to par with sandy bridge clock for clock, but will make up for it with having twice as many cores for the price.

This probably won't transfer into games that well, but for number crunching performance like video rendering/processing, it should be really powerful. Hopefully it's good for games too, but time will tell
I dunno. With that new design, single core performance is suppose to be through the roof. I'm expecting at least sandy bridge performance for gaming.
post #28 of 300
I think this chart is have to opposite effect they were hoping for for me. Thinking again about upgrading to a 2500k if i can get "bulldozer" speeds now rather that wait another four months. IT either that or buy some water cooling
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
6600k ASUS HERO VII Powercolor 290 RIPJAWS 5 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
KINGSTON SSD TOSHIBA 3TB h320 WINDOWS 10 PRO x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung 2343BWX + Benq XL2410T + Benq BL2400 TESORO  Antec 850 watt Corsair Obsidion 800D 
MouseMouse Pad
Roccat Kone XTD Steelseries metal 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
6600k ASUS HERO VII Powercolor 290 RIPJAWS 5 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
KINGSTON SSD TOSHIBA 3TB h320 WINDOWS 10 PRO x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung 2343BWX + Benq XL2410T + Benq BL2400 TESORO  Antec 850 watt Corsair Obsidion 800D 
MouseMouse Pad
Roccat Kone XTD Steelseries metal 
  hide details  
Reply
post #29 of 300
This basically means a 8core for $350?
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 5000 x2 Black Edition  BioStar 790GX 128M BFG 9800GT 1024 Mb 4x1 GB's of random thingies  
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
300GB Maxtor  Windows 7-U 64bit HP 19"  Logetech 
PowerCaseMouse
400 watt silver stone  Ultra Grid Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 5000 x2 Black Edition  BioStar 790GX 128M BFG 9800GT 1024 Mb 4x1 GB's of random thingies  
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
300GB Maxtor  Windows 7-U 64bit HP 19"  Logetech 
PowerCaseMouse
400 watt silver stone  Ultra Grid Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
post #30 of 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
Oh-oh.... that's not a good sign. Notice how AMD never just states "Superior Performance" as an advantage?


If Bulldozer is 50% faster than Phenom II, I think it would perform better clock-for-clock against Sandy Bridge?
they could be holding their cards close to their chest.

i hope they aren't, but it does explain some of it. at least i hope so
Herschel
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 4770K ASRock Z87M Extreme4 eVGA GTX 680 2GB 12GB G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1x 60GB SSD 1x 500GB, 1x 640GB, 1x 1TB Asus something or other Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Acer H236HLbid (23" 1920x1080) 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus VE198 (19". 1440x900) Microsoft Sidewinder X4 Seasonic X650 Antec P180 Mini White 
Mouse
Logitech G500 
  hide details  
Reply
Herschel
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 4770K ASRock Z87M Extreme4 eVGA GTX 680 2GB 12GB G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1x 60GB SSD 1x 500GB, 1x 640GB, 1x 1TB Asus something or other Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Acer H236HLbid (23" 1920x1080) 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus VE198 (19". 1440x900) Microsoft Sidewinder X4 Seasonic X650 Antec P180 Mini White 
Mouse
Logitech G500 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [XBIT] AMD Aims to Fight Core i7 “Sandy Bridge” with Bulldozer.