[Official] The Sandy Stable Club **Guides, Voltages, Temps & BIOS Templates** Inc SPREADSHEET - Page 896

Try Phase control "Optomized",duty control "extreme",cpu current capability "140%",these should help,i can run 5.1ghz with thes settings with an offset of +0.090v.

 

+1 on moorhen2 recommendations and I would manual set VRM freq to 350

 

again I'm not dissing the Sabertooth it's a fine board and Overclocker but it has a lesser VRM circuit than the boards I mentioned and from a results perspective I've seen peeps go from it to one of them with all other hardware being the same with better results albeit minor improvement the facts remain the same.

Now, I have tested mine.
Been running prime95 since nearly 24 hours and no crashing yet.
Enough Testing?
I couldve gone further, did 4.7 for a while, but i didn't want to pump up more voltage.

Sounds like you're stable, but don't forget to check your event view for WHEA 19 errors

I got 5ghz stable havet ran prime for 12hrs yet been folding for 16hrs stable tho prime ran for 3 hrs befor i started back folding.

Hello,I would like a clarification please.What temps should I look for max ? CPUTIN,PACKAGE,INDIVIDUAL CORE?
Thanks


4.3GHz on 1.20 volt is good?Using i7 2700k,can't go higher because I still use a crappy cooler,wait for w/c...

testing@5.2ghz.png 477k .png file

this is my first quick and dirty at 5.2ghz. this chip is a monster. will update when it's nice and stable. may need more volts, it may go lower. I've only been running for about 20 minutes so far.

The screenshot isnt on 5.2 but on 5.02.
Temps are pretty high for a H80 tbh but the custom loop will pull that down a lot i guess.

right you are. well that was a useless prime run.

I'll just hold off until I get the loop set up. no wonder it was stable, that's way too much voltage.

Hehe I wish my 2600k did 5Ghz on 1.428v... Mine barely does 4850Mhz with that voltage. And I need around and about 1.448-1.455 for 4.9...
Not that I can cool that with these ambients here atm.. It's around and about 29c outside and 26c in my room now. Only the suns right on it now and I dun have A/C so it'll rise to about 30c inside here this eve..

About that, i've compared CoreTemp 1.0 RC3 with HWMonitor and AIDA64 Ultimate in terms of CPU temps.
I was shocked by the difference. I always used CoreTemp until now but it gave me a 8-10c higher reading then the others with HWMonitor giving the lowest reading.
Now, I knew I forgot RealTemp so I grabbed that as well and it pretty much agrees with HWMonitor.

However, I don't.. I mean, I'm using a Venomous X Black Edition with 2 Enermax Apollish 120mm 2000RPM's on max speed (About 75CFM each) in a VERY well ventilated case yeah.
Ambient is 28c. CPU is my 2600K @ 4.81Ghz 1.424v load. How in the name of God can HWMonitor and RealTemp give a max core temp of 61c for the hottest core under game load, and Coretemp says 69c. AIDA pretty much agrees with Coretemp as it has no min-max but I saw 67c in there as well. 61c under game load is, in my eyes, pretty much impossible with air cooling with such a high ambient and with 1.424v on a 2600k. But maybe you guys can shed some light upon it.

Which program is right, cause if it hit 69c in BF3 then imma tune down a bit to 4.6Ghz which needs WAY less volts in this hot ambient.
If it only hit 61c, then I can just keep it like this. Or 69c shouldn't be a problem for gameloads in 28-30c ambient..