Overclock.net › Forums › Intel › Intel CPUs › IBT+Sig Rig?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

IBT+Sig Rig?

post #1 of 12
Thread Starter 
With my sig rig if I run IBT at 1.3 v it averages 58 secs 61 gflops, but with 1.4v it's 63 secs and gflops. Can someone point me where I need pointed to, to figure that out?
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 12
How many passes of IBT are you running each time you test?
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k ASRock P67 Extreme4 MSI GTX 580 Lightning 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 9-10-9-27-1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Mushkin 60GB SSD + 2xWD Black 500GB RAID0 Sony DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 22" 1080p + Acer 18" Das Keyboard - MX Blue Antec TruePower New TP-650 Cooler Master HAF 922 Black 
Mouse
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k ASRock P67 Extreme4 MSI GTX 580 Lightning 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 9-10-9-27-1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Mushkin 60GB SSD + 2xWD Black 500GB RAID0 Sony DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 22" 1080p + Acer 18" Das Keyboard - MX Blue Antec TruePower New TP-650 Cooler Master HAF 922 Black 
Mouse
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 12
Thread Starter 
Just ten. I wasn't stability testing I just reading that more volts was getting people better performance even if you weren't failing so I did two runs of 10 at each set of volts, thought it was weird getting numbers like that, did another set same result. Assumed there was some reading I needed to do.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 12
Something doesn't sound right to me, a 58sec run should read higher GFLOPS than a 63sec run... unless I am somehow misinterpreting?
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k ASRock P67 Extreme4 MSI GTX 580 Lightning 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 9-10-9-27-1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Mushkin 60GB SSD + 2xWD Black 500GB RAID0 Sony DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 22" 1080p + Acer 18" Das Keyboard - MX Blue Antec TruePower New TP-650 Cooler Master HAF 922 Black 
Mouse
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k ASRock P67 Extreme4 MSI GTX 580 Lightning 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 9-10-9-27-1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Mushkin 60GB SSD + 2xWD Black 500GB RAID0 Sony DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 22" 1080p + Acer 18" Das Keyboard - MX Blue Antec TruePower New TP-650 Cooler Master HAF 922 Black 
Mouse
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave12 View Post
Just ten. I wasn't stability testing I just reading that more volts was getting people better performance even if you weren't failing so I did two runs of 10 at each set of volts, thought it was weird getting numbers like that, did another set same result. Assumed there was some reading I needed to do.
well ya you can starve a cpu for voltage thats how you "can" get errors.
Giving mor volts can satisfy the chip's needs.
post #6 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by konspiracy View Post
well ya you can starve a cpu for voltage thats how you "can" get errors.
Giving mor volts can satisfy the chip's needs.

Except the lower voltage is the one thats reporting faster run times and higher GFlops.
The Wtfer
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2600K ASUS P8Z68-V PRO EVGA GTX 465 w/ 470 Shaders/Memory/Clocks 8GB G.Skill DDR3 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung F3 1TB LG 22X DVD±R DVD Burner Windows 7 Professional 64-Bit Dell U2311H + LG W2242S 
PowerCase
Corsair 750TX Coolermaster RC-692 Advanced 
  hide details  
Reply
The Wtfer
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2600K ASUS P8Z68-V PRO EVGA GTX 465 w/ 470 Shaders/Memory/Clocks 8GB G.Skill DDR3 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung F3 1TB LG 22X DVD±R DVD Burner Windows 7 Professional 64-Bit Dell U2311H + LG W2242S 
PowerCase
Corsair 750TX Coolermaster RC-692 Advanced 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 12
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by konspiracy View Post
well ya you can starve a cpu for voltage thats how you "can" get errors.
Giving mor volts can satisfy the chip's needs.
Right, but why would you get a higher time per run with higher voltage?
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 12
No, you are supposed to get a lower time per run with higher performance
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k ASRock P67 Extreme4 MSI GTX 580 Lightning 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 9-10-9-27-1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Mushkin 60GB SSD + 2xWD Black 500GB RAID0 Sony DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 22" 1080p + Acer 18" Das Keyboard - MX Blue Antec TruePower New TP-650 Cooler Master HAF 922 Black 
Mouse
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k ASRock P67 Extreme4 MSI GTX 580 Lightning 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 9-10-9-27-1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Mushkin 60GB SSD + 2xWD Black 500GB RAID0 Sony DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 22" 1080p + Acer 18" Das Keyboard - MX Blue Antec TruePower New TP-650 Cooler Master HAF 922 Black 
Mouse
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 12
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dissentience View Post
No, you are supposed to get a lower time per run with higher performance
Exactly. I have 5 percent longer run time and 3 percent better score with 1.4v. That's why I'm confused.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 12
Oops, I misread your last post as "but wouldn't I get a higher time per run with higher voltage..."
It was a long day at work haha

My only guess is that there is some sort of GFLOP calculation error in IBT. Maybe try using LinX and see if you get the same results?
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k ASRock P67 Extreme4 MSI GTX 580 Lightning 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 9-10-9-27-1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Mushkin 60GB SSD + 2xWD Black 500GB RAID0 Sony DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 22" 1080p + Acer 18" Das Keyboard - MX Blue Antec TruePower New TP-650 Cooler Master HAF 922 Black 
Mouse
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600k ASRock P67 Extreme4 MSI GTX 580 Lightning 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 9-10-9-27-1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Mushkin 60GB SSD + 2xWD Black 500GB RAID0 Sony DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG 22" 1080p + Acer 18" Das Keyboard - MX Blue Antec TruePower New TP-650 Cooler Master HAF 922 Black 
Mouse
Logitech 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Intel CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › Intel › Intel CPUs › IBT+Sig Rig?