Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Technology and Science News › [WPN] More Than Half Of U.S. Internet Connections Below FCC Standards
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[WPN] More Than Half Of U.S. Internet Connections Below FCC Standards - Page 9

post #81 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathris View Post
Population density is misleading, since it includes places nobody lives like the Mojave desert, Rocky Mountains, and South Dakota.

The Eastern Seaboard of the US has roughly the same population density as South Korea, yet South Koreans get 100Mbit internet for $30/month.
Wow, that's absolutely staggering--I never thought about it like that.

Knowing that most larger ISP's have pocketed record profits each year since about 2007/2008, while I'm sure some money has gone in to advancing the infrastructure, I would say that there was a sort of "gentleman's agreement" that consumers understood that ISP's would invest money beyond the previous records of profit in previous years--which you would think a good company would do--into the infrastructure. Which hasn't really happened. That excess has just been pocketed. Net access has improved slightly over what was available ~10 years ago, with fiber optic connections being available to some of the population, but to be honest, there are a lot of locations that just can't get those higher speeds. The town I grew up in--a small-ish town in northern California--is one example. Only recently--like within the last 3-5 years--has the DSL access speeds gone beyond a 3mbps connection because the phone lines laid down were not able to support the bandwidth. Of course larger cities is a nice place to start as far as improving, but when you have 100mbps access in some areas, and others just a hair beyond dial-up, there's a huge disparity in access. I'm not saying that everyone in that area necessarily WANTS 100mbps connections, but to just now have beyond a 3mbps connection even possible in the past 3 years, it's surprising.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K Biostar TP67B+ XFX HD5750 1GB 2x4GB DDR3 Corsair 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
60GB OCZ SSD, 2x160GB HDD RAID0, 500GB+500GB+1.5TB Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Samsung SyncMaster 930B Antec SmartPower 450w 
Case
Antec 900 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K Biostar TP67B+ XFX HD5750 1GB 2x4GB DDR3 Corsair 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
60GB OCZ SSD, 2x160GB HDD RAID0, 500GB+500GB+1.5TB Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Samsung SyncMaster 930B Antec SmartPower 450w 
Case
Antec 900 
  hide details  
Reply
post #82 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathris View Post
Population density is misleading, since it includes places nobody lives like the Mojave desert, Rocky Mountains, and South Dakota.

The Eastern Seaboard of the US has roughly the same population density as South Korea, yet South Koreans get 100Mbit internet for $30/month.
that is the lack of interest from part of the ISP's to get better services, and gov't most likely as some of you said doesn't help the ISP's to invest compared to south korea
WOOT 4.0
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I5 6600k MSI Z170A Gaming Carbon Pro R9 380 MSI Gaming Kingston Fury 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Western Digital WESTERN DIGITAL CAVIAR BLUE Kingston Hyper-X LG DVD+/-Rw 24x DLayer Sata 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Xigmatek Dark Knight Windows 10 Pro 64 Bits BenQ RL2455HM Asus Echelon 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
CORSAIR GAMING SERIES GS600 Antec Three Hundred Two Logitech G502 Steelseries QCK 
Audio
Sennheiser PC333d 
  hide details  
Reply
WOOT 4.0
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I5 6600k MSI Z170A Gaming Carbon Pro R9 380 MSI Gaming Kingston Fury 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Western Digital WESTERN DIGITAL CAVIAR BLUE Kingston Hyper-X LG DVD+/-Rw 24x DLayer Sata 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Xigmatek Dark Knight Windows 10 Pro 64 Bits BenQ RL2455HM Asus Echelon 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
CORSAIR GAMING SERIES GS600 Antec Three Hundred Two Logitech G502 Steelseries QCK 
Audio
Sennheiser PC333d 
  hide details  
Reply
post #83 of 85
This isn't a failing of the FCC or the ISPs. This is a failure of American businessmen to step up and offer fast, affordable internet in the US. We need someone like Henry Ford to come along and knock the industry on its ass with a cheap, quality product.
The Obelisk
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 950 ASUS Rampage III Formula EVGA GeForce GTX 480 2-Way SLI  6GB Kingston HyperX DDR3  
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
2x 1TB Western Digital Caviar Black Crucial M4 128GB SATA III LG DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 w/ Shin Etsu 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
2x Arctic Cooling Accelero Xtreme Plus II Windows 7 Home Premium LG Flatron W2361 SteelSeries 7g 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Kingwin Lazer LZ-1000 Corsair Graphite Series 600T WHITE Logitech G500 SteelSeries 4HD 
AudioAudio
ASUS Xonar Essence STX Sennheiser HD598 
  hide details  
Reply
The Obelisk
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 950 ASUS Rampage III Formula EVGA GeForce GTX 480 2-Way SLI  6GB Kingston HyperX DDR3  
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
2x 1TB Western Digital Caviar Black Crucial M4 128GB SATA III LG DVD-RW Noctua NH-D14 w/ Shin Etsu 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
2x Arctic Cooling Accelero Xtreme Plus II Windows 7 Home Premium LG Flatron W2361 SteelSeries 7g 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Kingwin Lazer LZ-1000 Corsair Graphite Series 600T WHITE Logitech G500 SteelSeries 4HD 
AudioAudio
ASUS Xonar Essence STX Sennheiser HD598 
  hide details  
Reply
post #84 of 85
I have a whopping 1 ISP to choose from...
post #85 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlayerS_`Archduke` View Post
This isn't a failing of the FCC or the ISPs. This is a failure of American businessmen to step up and offer fast, affordable internet in the US. We need someone like Henry Ford to come along and knock the industry on its ass with a cheap, quality product.
How can you do that when a very few of the current ISP's have invested the money in building/laying their own lines--they'd have to agree for a smaller business to buy up part of that infrastructure, knowing that such businesses will try to undercut their pricing. I don't know of any big business that would agree to that.

It's a failing of the FCC to allow a few big businesses to own virtually all of the data infrastructure.
Edited by guyladouche - 3/24/11 at 3:04pm
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K Biostar TP67B+ XFX HD5750 1GB 2x4GB DDR3 Corsair 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
60GB OCZ SSD, 2x160GB HDD RAID0, 500GB+500GB+1.5TB Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Samsung SyncMaster 930B Antec SmartPower 450w 
Case
Antec 900 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K Biostar TP67B+ XFX HD5750 1GB 2x4GB DDR3 Corsair 1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
60GB OCZ SSD, 2x160GB HDD RAID0, 500GB+500GB+1.5TB Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Samsung SyncMaster 930B Antec SmartPower 450w 
Case
Antec 900 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Technology and Science News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Technology and Science News › [WPN] More Than Half Of U.S. Internet Connections Below FCC Standards