Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › 60 fps possible in crysis?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

60 fps possible in crysis? - Page 3

post #21 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar View Post
as a rule of thumb: the next generation top single GPU about equals the previous gen dual GPU. (assuming a shrink from 40nm to 28nm etc... tho )
Hmm I wouldn't say that.

The 580 isn't better than the 5970.
Same with the 6970 vs the 5970.
At least with games that support cfx well.

I would agree that they are damn close. But the 5970 still holds its ground pretty well.

Even the 480 vs 295, it was not conclusive. You can easily see reviews where the 295 is higher than the 480 in many cases.

So I wouldn't say its a rule.
They are close, but not necessarily as fast or faster. Especially as today, almost all the games are native CFX/SLI support.
Main system
(16 items)
 
Editing PC
(8 items)
 
 
CPUGraphicsGraphicsRAM
E5-1680v2 AMD FirePro D700 AMD FirePro D700 64GB 1866mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
1TB PCIE SSD OSX 10.10.x Dell U2713H Mac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Main system
(16 items)
 
Editing PC
(8 items)
 
 
CPUGraphicsGraphicsRAM
E5-1680v2 AMD FirePro D700 AMD FirePro D700 64GB 1866mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
1TB PCIE SSD OSX 10.10.x Dell U2713H Mac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #22 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasanovaFly View Post
Kepler is supposed to get 4 times more FPS than a 590?

Impressive.
Per Watt of energy.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
|i7 2600K| |EVGA P67 SLI| |N560GTX-Ti Hawk| Waiting on Sandy Bridge :) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Waiting on Sandy Bridge :) |Windows 7 Ulitmate 64-Bit| |Hanns-G HZ281HPB 1920x1200| |Silverstone Strider Plus 850W| 
Case
|SilverStone RV03| ETA: 04/05/11 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
|i7 2600K| |EVGA P67 SLI| |N560GTX-Ti Hawk| Waiting on Sandy Bridge :) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Waiting on Sandy Bridge :) |Windows 7 Ulitmate 64-Bit| |Hanns-G HZ281HPB 1920x1200| |Silverstone Strider Plus 850W| 
Case
|SilverStone RV03| ETA: 04/05/11 
  hide details  
Reply
post #23 of 33
i got 69fps.

gtx 480 stock.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 980x Asus Rampage 3 Extreme GTX 480(ek waterblock) Corsair Dominator GT 6gb 2000mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
1tb 7500rpm WD Windows 7 64bit Acer gd235hz 23'' Tactx 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
GX 750 Corsair 800D Tactx starcraft 2 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 980x Asus Rampage 3 Extreme GTX 480(ek waterblock) Corsair Dominator GT 6gb 2000mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
1tb 7500rpm WD Windows 7 64bit Acer gd235hz 23'' Tactx 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
GX 750 Corsair 800D Tactx starcraft 2 
  hide details  
Reply
post #24 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasanovaFly View Post
Kepler is supposed to get 4 times more FPS than a 590?

Impressive.
It's supposed to be 4x performance per watt. And I don't think the base was the 590. It was either a 480 or 580. And iirc, I don't think the number was 4x. More like 3x .
Slow and Crappy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 960 Asus Rampage II Gene GTX480 6x 2GB Mushkin Redline 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
OCZ Vertex 3 MaxIOPS 120GB / 2x WD RE4 2TB RAID 1 Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1 Corsair TX850 V2 Lian-Li PC-A04B 
  hide details  
Reply
Slow and Crappy
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 960 Asus Rampage II Gene GTX480 6x 2GB Mushkin Redline 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
OCZ Vertex 3 MaxIOPS 120GB / 2x WD RE4 2TB RAID 1 Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1 Corsair TX850 V2 Lian-Li PC-A04B 
  hide details  
Reply
post #25 of 33
Meh average FPS means nothing. Minimum FPS is what counts and to this day, there is no card that can pull sixty off.
sinep
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 GA-X58A-UD3R MSI GTX 650Ti Corsair XMS3 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Seagate 4TB + Crucial M4 64-bit Windows 7 Home Premium Asus VG248QE </3 Sidewinder X4 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Wheel Mouse Optical Sideways Puretrak Talent Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 + Red Sony MDRZX300 
  hide details  
Reply
sinep
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 GA-X58A-UD3R MSI GTX 650Ti Corsair XMS3 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Seagate 4TB + Crucial M4 64-bit Windows 7 Home Premium Asus VG248QE </3 Sidewinder X4 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Wheel Mouse Optical Sideways Puretrak Talent Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 + Red Sony MDRZX300 
  hide details  
Reply
post #26 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuad View Post
Meh average FPS means nothing. Minimum FPS is what counts and to this day, there is no card that can pull sixty off.
Tri-580s at 1680X1050.
Should win you a min of at least 60
Main system
(16 items)
 
Editing PC
(8 items)
 
 
CPUGraphicsGraphicsRAM
E5-1680v2 AMD FirePro D700 AMD FirePro D700 64GB 1866mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
1TB PCIE SSD OSX 10.10.x Dell U2713H Mac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Main system
(16 items)
 
Editing PC
(8 items)
 
 
CPUGraphicsGraphicsRAM
E5-1680v2 AMD FirePro D700 AMD FirePro D700 64GB 1866mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
1TB PCIE SSD OSX 10.10.x Dell U2713H Mac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #27 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defoler View Post
Hmm I wouldn't say that.

The 580 isn't better than the 5970.
Same with the 6970 vs the 5970.
At least with games that support cfx well.

I would agree that they are damn close. But the 5970 still holds its ground pretty well.

Even the 480 vs 295, it was not conclusive. You can easily see reviews where the 295 is higher than the 480 in many cases.

So I wouldn't say its a rule.
They are close, but not necessarily as fast or faster. Especially as today, almost all the games are native CFX/SLI support.
I said that assuming there was a jump from a process to another (for example 40nm ---> 28nm) so I did not mean that a 580 would match a 5970, they're both on the same 40nm process.

And I also said about. The 295 is about as powerful as the 480 fps wise and the same goes for the 4870x2 5870 pair.

Anyway what I meant is that that's the kind of jump you can expect from kepler. People always go guessing that the next gen will have 4x more fps than the previous but in reality it's much closer to a 50-80% increase in perf.
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
post #28 of 33
crysis 2 is not very demanding, It ran perfect on a single 5870. 5850 should have no problem.
New i7 950 build
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-950 @ 4.2ghz MSI Big Bang x58  Crossfire Sapphire 7970 OC  6gb HyperX 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
C300 64gb , Agility2 90gb, 2x WD greens Raid 0 Samsung 830 series 64gb H100 Windows 7 64bit 
MonitorPowerCase
Crossover 1440p OCZ ZX850W Lian li Pc-x2000f 
  hide details  
Reply
New i7 950 build
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-950 @ 4.2ghz MSI Big Bang x58  Crossfire Sapphire 7970 OC  6gb HyperX 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
C300 64gb , Agility2 90gb, 2x WD greens Raid 0 Samsung 830 series 64gb H100 Windows 7 64bit 
MonitorPowerCase
Crossover 1440p OCZ ZX850W Lian li Pc-x2000f 
  hide details  
Reply
post #29 of 33
Why would u need minimum 60 FPS anyway ? As long as it's over 30 there's no difference.
post #30 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wulfgar View Post
Why would u need minimum 60 FPS anyway ? As long as it's over 30 there's no difference.

30 fps sucks, you can easily see the diff from 30 to 60
Mini Might
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500k ASUS Maximus 4 Gene-z  7970 REF 16GB Sam LP 30nm 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 830 LG BR  HP212+ W7 64B 
MonitorPowerCase
27" Corsair 750HX Silverstone PS07 
  hide details  
Reply
Mini Might
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500k ASUS Maximus 4 Gene-z  7970 REF 16GB Sam LP 30nm 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 830 LG BR  HP212+ W7 64B 
MonitorPowerCase
27" Corsair 750HX Silverstone PS07 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: NVIDIA
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › 60 fps possible in crysis?