Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 18.0.1: 19 January [Firefox 64-Bit]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Waterfox 18.0.1: 19 January [Firefox 64-Bit] - Page 221

post #2201 of 5134
4/29/12 at 7:33am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenthos View Post

I've got some results :
Peacekeeper
Firefox 12 stock : 1947 http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=5LT7
Waterfox 12 w/o tcmalloc : 2035 http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=5LTa
Waterfox 12 w/ tcmalloc : 2199 http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=5LTL
SunSpider
Firefox 12 stock : 228ms
Waterfox 12 w/o tcmalloc : 218ms
Waterfox 12 w/ tcmalloc : 207ms

Try quoting yourself. You've got quite some long links there, lol...

Have you tried to redo the tests? For SunSpider the difference is not really real, minimal at best. But there is a difference which is more substantial between them in Peacekeeper. Interesting...
Reply
Reply
post #2202 of 5134
4/29/12 at 8:35am
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTBBTF View Post

Try quoting yourself. You've got quite some long links there, lol...
Have you tried to redo the tests? For SunSpider the difference is not really real, minimal at best. But there is a difference which is more substantial between them in Peacekeeper. Interesting...

yeah, those SunSpider links are horrible, tried to cover them up with hyper-links.

I used SunSpider because I'm too inpatient to wait for a lengthy benchmark. biggrin.gif

Peacekeeper results are interesting indeed, although from real world experience I thought that waterfox w/o tcmalloc "felt" smoother.
Reply
Reply
post #2203 of 5134
4/29/12 at 1:58pm
I have been having an issue with waterfox on one of my computer where I end up with over 100 instances of firefox.exe (waterfox actually). I have tried to uninstall reboot then reinstall, but the issue still occurs. It only happens if I have waterfox running. I have also set IE as my default browser, but no extra instances of iexplore.exe show up.

Any thoughts on what I can do? All the processes really slow down computing and browsing experience.

Thanks!
Reply
Reply
post #2204 of 5134
4/29/12 at 2:15pm
hi


its me a gain , i think i found something interesting which resolved the bad playing in youtube.
i found another script that can be added to greasemonkey , to fix this issue up.

maybe someone can understand what this script CLEAR out from the youtube page who screw youtube playing using firefox
in google chrome this issue doesn't exist ...

direct link to script

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/74961

this is the source code


// ==UserScript==
// @name remove Youtube adds
// @namespace youtubetads
// @version 1.1
// @author FDisk
// @description Remove youtube ads from the right side of the screen and from the embeded video
// @include http://*.youtube.com/watch?*
// @include http://youtube.com/watch?*
// @require http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3.2/jquery.min.js
// @require http://jquery.lukelutman.com/plugins/flash/jquery.flash.js
// @require http://usocheckup.redirectme.net/74961.js
// ==/UserScript==

//Check for updates

$('#homepage-sidebar-ads').remove();

$('#google_companion_ad_div, #watch-channel-brand-div, #watch-channel-brand-div').remove();
var video = 'https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/'+$('#watch-mfu-button').attr('data-video-id');
$('#watch-player').empty().flash(
{
height: 1280,
width: 720,
src : video+'?version=1&autoplay=0&fs=1&hd=1'
}
);
Edited by demoneye - 4/30/12 at 2:05am
Reply
Reply
post #2205 of 5134
4/30/12 at 2:52am
Quote:
Enter about:config in the address bar
Search for app.update.url.override (if it does not exist, Right Click > New > String)
Modify its value to http://waterfoxproject.org/update/%CHANNEL%/%VERSION%/update.xml
I have turned on automatic updates but not see any notifications about Waterfox 12 ? Any changes?
Reply
Reply
post #2206 of 5134
4/30/12 at 2:37pm
Firefox x86 12.0 Final -> 2009 (HTML5 Capabilities 6/7)
Waterfox x64 12.0 -> 2143 (HTML5 Capabilities 6/7)
Edited by bleiburg - 4/30/12 at 2:43pm
Reply
Reply
post #2207 of 5134
4/30/12 at 3:56pm
People worrying about synthetic benchmarks when they probably won't notice any real world difference. tongue.gif
Captain Overkill
(15 items)
  		  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition @ 4.0GHz Asus Crosshair IV Extreme XFX Radeon HD 6970 2GB + 6970 2GB CrossFireX G.Skill Ripjaws Series 16GB (4x4GB) DDR3 @ 1600MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 128GB SATA-III SSD + 4X Seagate Barr... Lite-On 12X Blu-Ray Burner Corsair H100 (2X Scythe Gentle Typhoon AP-31s) Windows 8 Pro 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung SyncMaster P2450H Ducky Shine DK9008S (Cherry MX Brown) Antec High Current Pro HCP-1200 1200W Cooler Master HAF X 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G9x Razer Vespula Asus Xonar Essence STX + Behringer MS40 Studio ... 
View all
  hide details  
Reply
Captain Overkill
(15 items)
  		  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition @ 4.0GHz Asus Crosshair IV Extreme XFX Radeon HD 6970 2GB + 6970 2GB CrossFireX G.Skill Ripjaws Series 16GB (4x4GB) DDR3 @ 1600MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 128GB SATA-III SSD + 4X Seagate Barr... Lite-On 12X Blu-Ray Burner Corsair H100 (2X Scythe Gentle Typhoon AP-31s) Windows 8 Pro 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung SyncMaster P2450H Ducky Shine DK9008S (Cherry MX Brown) Antec High Current Pro HCP-1200 1200W Cooler Master HAF X 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G9x Razer Vespula Asus Xonar Essence STX + Behringer MS40 Studio ... 
View all
  hide details  
Reply
post #2208 of 5134
4/30/12 at 4:17pm
how does one use 32 bit and 64 bit water fox at the same time? i thought this was an install in it's own directory. then i come to find it does not ;/ can i use 32x and 64x at the same time side by side?
Edited by slackerdude - 4/30/12 at 4:19pm
Reply
Reply
post #2209 of 5134
4/30/12 at 4:38pm
Different profiles using command switches. biggrin.gif
Captain Overkill
(15 items)
  		  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition @ 4.0GHz Asus Crosshair IV Extreme XFX Radeon HD 6970 2GB + 6970 2GB CrossFireX G.Skill Ripjaws Series 16GB (4x4GB) DDR3 @ 1600MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 128GB SATA-III SSD + 4X Seagate Barr... Lite-On 12X Blu-Ray Burner Corsair H100 (2X Scythe Gentle Typhoon AP-31s) Windows 8 Pro 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung SyncMaster P2450H Ducky Shine DK9008S (Cherry MX Brown) Antec High Current Pro HCP-1200 1200W Cooler Master HAF X 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G9x Razer Vespula Asus Xonar Essence STX + Behringer MS40 Studio ... 
View all
  hide details  
Reply
Captain Overkill
(15 items)
  		  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition @ 4.0GHz Asus Crosshair IV Extreme XFX Radeon HD 6970 2GB + 6970 2GB CrossFireX G.Skill Ripjaws Series 16GB (4x4GB) DDR3 @ 1600MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 128GB SATA-III SSD + 4X Seagate Barr... Lite-On 12X Blu-Ray Burner Corsair H100 (2X Scythe Gentle Typhoon AP-31s) Windows 8 Pro 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung SyncMaster P2450H Ducky Shine DK9008S (Cherry MX Brown) Antec High Current Pro HCP-1200 1200W Cooler Master HAF X 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G9x Razer Vespula Asus Xonar Essence STX + Behringer MS40 Studio ... 
View all
  hide details  
Reply
post #2210 of 5134
4/30/12 at 6:49pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Venom View Post

People worrying about synthetic benchmarks when they probably won't notice any real world difference. tongue.gif

The reason we use these benchmarks is because we no longer notice the difference... not the other way around.

Every browser these days is "fast" so pick whatever you want.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Other Software
Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 18.0.1: 19 January [Firefox 64-Bit]