Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 48.0.2: 06 September [Firefox 64-Bit]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Waterfox 48.0.2: 06 September [Firefox 64-Bit] - Page 215

post #2141 of 7225
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAlex View Post

about:buildconfig lists everything I have disabled and enabled. I mostly disabled things which have no use to a 3rd party build - such as debugging tests and the crash reporter. That's about it. Otherwise everything else remains the same.

So the commonly repeated "Waterfox is basically a 64-Bit version of Firefox", which was probably true up to and including version 8 of Waterfox, is now a misleading statement, as since v9 Waterfox does disable a number of Firefox features during the compile, yes?

Perhaps you should make it clear which of the Firefox features are disabled in Waterfox so that users and potential users can tell by reading the OP what Waterfox is and what it isn't?
post #2142 of 7225
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAlex View Post

EDIT: Could anyone test this Waterfox I've attached. Lockless wasn't working, so I'm using tcmalloc (Google Performance Tools). There should be better performance at the cost of increased memory usage. I'd like to see what other people make of it.
http://www.mediafire.com/?ykuzshd8s3637fc


Here are my benchmarks.


Disabled All Addons and Plugins, and cleared Caches , Cookies, and etc before each test and also VACUUME'd SQlite Databases before each test after cleaning.

Waterfox 11
Peacekeeper:http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=5KQ5&resultId=2355629
SunSpider: Sunspider Results (Click to show)
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
Total: 210.7ms +/- 0.9%

3d: 35.0ms +/- 1.7%
cube: 14.4ms +/- 2.6%
morph: 7.4ms +/- 5.0%
raytrace: 13.2ms +/- 2.3%

access: 17.9ms +/- 5.1%
binary-trees: 2.5ms +/- 15.1%
fannkuch: 7.9ms +/- 2.9%
nbody: 3.8ms +/- 7.9%
nsieve: 3.7ms +/- 9.3%

bitops: 11.9ms +/- 3.4%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 0.9ms +/- 25.1%
bits-in-byte: 4.7ms +/- 7.3%
bitwise-and: 3.2ms +/- 9.4%
nsieve-bits: 3.1ms +/- 7.3%

controlflow: 2.4ms +/- 15.4%
recursive: 2.4ms +/- 15.4%

crypto: 17.9ms +/- 2.3%
aes: 9.4ms +/- 3.9%
md5: 5.0ms +/- 0.0%
sha1: 3.5ms +/- 10.8%

date: 35.9ms +/- 2.0%
format-tofte: 18.1ms +/- 2.2%
format-xparb: 17.8ms +/- 2.5%

math: 15.7ms +/- 3.7%
cordic: 3.3ms +/- 10.5%
partial-sums: 9.8ms +/- 3.1%
spectral-norm: 2.6ms +/- 14.2%

regexp: 11.0ms +/- 3.1%
dna: 11.0ms +/- 3.1%

string: 63.0ms +/- 0.8%
base64: 5.2ms +/- 5.8%
fasta: 7.2ms +/- 4.2%
tagcloud: 20.2ms +/- 1.5%
unpack-code: 23.2ms +/- 1.3%
validate-input: 7.2ms +/- 4.2%


Waterfox 12 (MediaFire Mirror)
Peacekeeper:http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=5KR5&resultId=2355738
SunSpider: Sunspider Results (Click to show)
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
Total: 201.5ms +/- 0.7%

3d: 34.9ms +/- 1.5%
cube: 14.0ms +/- 0.0%
morph: 6.5ms +/- 5.8%
raytrace: 14.4ms +/- 2.6%

access: 17.1ms +/- 3.7%
binary-trees: 2.5ms +/- 15.1%
fannkuch: 7.4ms +/- 5.0%
nbody: 3.7ms +/- 9.3%
nsieve: 3.5ms +/- 10.8%

bitops: 11.9ms +/- 5.3%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 1.0ms +/- 0.0%
bits-in-byte: 4.6ms +/- 8.0%
bitwise-and: 3.3ms +/- 10.5%
nsieve-bits: 3.0ms +/- 0.0%

controlflow: 2.2ms +/- 13.7%
recursive: 2.2ms +/- 13.7%

crypto: 18.3ms +/- 1.9%
aes: 9.7ms +/- 3.6%
md5: 4.8ms +/- 6.3%
sha1: 3.8ms +/- 7.9%

date: 34.3ms +/- 2.0%
format-tofte: 17.9ms +/- 2.3%
format-xparb: 16.4ms +/- 3.0%

math: 15.1ms +/- 4.1%
cordic: 3.4ms +/- 10.9%
partial-sums: 9.2ms +/- 3.3%
spectral-norm: 2.5ms +/- 15.1%

regexp: 10.7ms +/- 4.5%
dna: 10.7ms +/- 4.5%

string: 57.0ms +/- 1.8%
base64: 4.7ms +/- 10.3%
fasta: 6.6ms +/- 5.6%
tagcloud: 18.4ms +/- 2.0%
unpack-code: 20.8ms +/- 1.4%
validate-input: 6.5ms +/- 5.8%



Firefox 12


Peacekeeper: http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=5KQp&resultId=2355713
SunSpider: Sunspider Results (Click to show)
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
Total: 205.2ms +/- 4.8%

3d: 32.5ms +/- 1.9%
cube: 12.0ms +/- 2.8%
morph: 6.6ms +/- 5.6%
raytrace: 13.9ms +/- 1.6%

access: 16.3ms +/- 4.6%
binary-trees: 2.3ms +/- 15.0%
fannkuch: 7.2ms +/- 4.2%
nbody: 3.5ms +/- 10.8%
nsieve: 3.3ms +/- 10.5%

bitops: 10.9ms +/- 3.7%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 0.9ms +/- 25.1%
bits-in-byte: 4.1ms +/- 5.5%
bitwise-and: 2.9ms +/- 7.8%
nsieve-bits: 3.0ms +/- 0.0%

controlflow: 2.4ms +/- 15.4%
recursive: 2.4ms +/- 15.4%

crypto: 18.3ms +/- 3.7%
aes: 8.5ms +/- 4.4%
md5: 6.6ms +/- 5.6%
sha1: 3.2ms +/- 9.4%

date: 32.0ms +/- 1.8%
format-tofte: 14.9ms +/- 2.7%
format-xparb: 17.1ms +/- 2.4%

math: 17.9ms +/- 7.2%
cordic: 2.9ms +/- 7.8%
partial-sums: 12.4ms +/- 9.5%
spectral-norm: 2.6ms +/- 14.2%

regexp: 11.1ms +/- 2.0%
dna: 11.1ms +/- 2.0%

string: 63.8ms +/- 16.6%
base64: 4.5ms +/- 8.4%
fasta: 6.1ms +/- 3.7%
tagcloud: 18.9ms +/- 2.1%
unpack-code: 21.9ms +/- 1.0%
validate-input: 12.4ms +/- 88.3%


*Done Editing lol

Note:
Didn't realize how addons slow down Firefox, way faster after disabling all addons ( i have 10) i need to take a look at which addon's are slowing everything down =P
Edited by SlimDan22 - 4/25/12 at 10:59am
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 860 2.8 Ghz EVGA Nvidia GTX 470 8 Gb DDR3 
OS
Windows 7 x64 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 860 2.8 Ghz EVGA Nvidia GTX 470 8 Gb DDR3 
OS
Windows 7 x64 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2143 of 7225
greasemonkey is a scripter activator , i t uses a scripts code to make some changes in page smile.gif
post #2144 of 7225
SlimDan22 - Good tests! I noticed Waterfox 12 scored higher compared to 11. I'm thinking about installing just the browsers (no addons, etc.) clearing the caches and cookies then testing them in safe mode so I have the bare minimum of services running. Each browser will probably be tested twice.

You're right about the addons. They can slow you down. I know Mozilla was working on making the addons use less resources. Hope the addon creators and Mozilla can make this happen to make Firefox speedier.
post #2145 of 7225
just a little remark , disabling "hardware acceleration" and running peacekeeper test will results half score ....
post #2146 of 7225
These are my results:

Sunspider :

FF 12 x86
206.7ms +/- 0.8%
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Waterfox 11 x64
215.8ms +/- 0.7%
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Waterfox 12 x64
197.9ms +/- 0.7%
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Dromaeo comparison : left to right

FF12x86 - WF11x64 - WF12x64

538.38runs/s ±1.68% - 470.93runs/s ±1.54% - 524.92runs/s ±1.41%

http://dromaeo.com/?id=169713,169628,169711
Edited by Xenthos - 4/25/12 at 11:02am
post #2147 of 7225
Thread Starter 

Good news and bad news. Good news is: tcmalloc wasn't implemented properly before, but now it is and on browsermark my score went from 322K to 460K (testing on both versions of WF12)! The bad news is that the installer isn't working.

 

    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7-4650U Intel HD Graphics 5000 Samsung 8GB DDR3 Samsung 512GB SSD 
OS
Macintosh OS X "Yosemite" 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7-4650U Intel HD Graphics 5000 Samsung 8GB DDR3 Samsung 512GB SSD 
OS
Macintosh OS X "Yosemite" 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2148 of 7225
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAlex View Post

Good news and bad news. Good news is: tcmalloc wasn't implemented properly before, but now it is and on browsermark my score went from 322K to 460K (testing on both versions of WF12)! The bad news is that the installer isn't working.

Wow ! Nice biggrin.gif

I'm sure you'll be able to fix that, otherwise... feel free to put it in the download section anyway wink.gif
post #2149 of 7225

Updating Now!

Main Rig
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
1090T X6 | 3.2ghz  ASUS Sabertooth 990FX MSI 6970 Lightning | 940/1375 G.Skill Snipers 8gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 840 Evo  Seagate ST31000524AS  Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 None 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
CM TPC 812 Windows 10 Pro HP w19e: 1440x900 | Sony KDL40S-5100 1920x1080 CMStorm Quick Fire. 
PowerCaseMouse
CM 1050w  Cooler Master Cosmos II Roccat Kone XTD (Optical) 
  hide details  
Reply
Main Rig
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
1090T X6 | 3.2ghz  ASUS Sabertooth 990FX MSI 6970 Lightning | 940/1375 G.Skill Snipers 8gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 840 Evo  Seagate ST31000524AS  Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 None 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
CM TPC 812 Windows 10 Pro HP w19e: 1440x900 | Sony KDL40S-5100 1920x1080 CMStorm Quick Fire. 
PowerCaseMouse
CM 1050w  Cooler Master Cosmos II Roccat Kone XTD (Optical) 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2150 of 7225
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAlex View Post

Good news and bad news. Good news is: tcmalloc wasn't implemented properly before, but now it is and on browsermark my score went from 322K to 460K (testing on both versions of WF12)! The bad news is that the installer isn't working.

Lol! The joy of building! Fix one thing and break another. Thanks for all the work and aggravation you go through Mr Alex! biggrin.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Other Software
Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 48.0.2: 06 September [Firefox 64-Bit]