Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 54.0.1: 15 Jly [Firefox 64-Bit]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Waterfox 54.0.1: 15 Jly [Firefox 64-Bit] - Page 25

post #241 of 7317
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cipher;13452436 
If I find the time I might look into compiling it myself one day, always been a bit curious. It'll put my x6 to good use at least

Yeah, it's quite a fun thing to do. But note it takes a long time to compile tongue.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laylow;13452903 
Just started using this, it is great. Noticed an increase in speed right away.
Thanks for doing this!

No problem, great to hear it worked out for you biggrin.gif
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7-4650U Intel HD Graphics 5000 Samsung 8GB DDR3 Samsung 512GB SSD 
OS
Macintosh OS X "Yosemite" 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7-4650U Intel HD Graphics 5000 Samsung 8GB DDR3 Samsung 512GB SSD 
OS
Macintosh OS X "Yosemite" 
  hide details  
Reply
post #242 of 7317
Quote:
Originally Posted by IlovetheChosenone;13358930 
Can you release a waterfox 4.0 that looks exactly like 3.6 firefox?

waterfox36.png

Eh, close enough. cool.gif
Edited by qwertymac93 - 5/11/11 at 1:48am
z87
(18 items)
 
Media Rig
(18 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II 720 ASRock 870 Extreme 3 HIS 5750 (840core/1200mem) 2*2GB A-Data DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 Seagate Barracuda ST3000DM001 Lite-On Blue Ray WH14NS40 Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 PRO 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 pro 64-bit Vizio M43-c1 Logitech K400 Corsair CX-430 
CaseMouseAudioAudio
NZXT Beta EVO Gigabyte M7700 Sony STR-DN1070 Definitive Technology BP8 Tower Speakers 
AudioAudio
Definitive Technology 2002 Series Center Speaker Definitive Technology ProMonitor 1000 Bookshelf... 
  hide details  
Reply
z87
(18 items)
 
Media Rig
(18 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II 720 ASRock 870 Extreme 3 HIS 5750 (840core/1200mem) 2*2GB A-Data DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 Seagate Barracuda ST3000DM001 Lite-On Blue Ray WH14NS40 Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 PRO 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 pro 64-bit Vizio M43-c1 Logitech K400 Corsair CX-430 
CaseMouseAudioAudio
NZXT Beta EVO Gigabyte M7700 Sony STR-DN1070 Definitive Technology BP8 Tower Speakers 
AudioAudio
Definitive Technology 2002 Series Center Speaker Definitive Technology ProMonitor 1000 Bookshelf... 
  hide details  
Reply
post #243 of 7317
I've been running Waterfox for about 2 weeks now, and can't say I notice any change in performance over Firefox. Not to say that a difference doesn't exist.

However, the amount of memory it uses over Firefox is inexcusable.

Firefox with 1 tab = 122,340K
Waterfox with same 1 tab = 143,976K
Firefox with 5 tabs = 189,840K
Waterfox with same 5 tabs = 262,404K

Of course, the difference changes depending on what web pages, and other factors. But it remains that Waterfox uses much more memory than Firefox.

And also, of course, they both use much less memory than chrome. ~100,000K less on average when using multiple tabs.
Sigma
(14 items)
 
NukeBox
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Quad Q9550 GIGABYTE EP45T-USB3P HIS Radeon HD 4870 Turbo G.Skill Ripjaws 7-8-7-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Western Digital Caviar Green Seagate Baracuda Generic DVD Burner Windows 7 Home Premium 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
2 x Asus 23" Rosewill Black normal keyboard Antec TP 750 Antec Nine Hundred 
MouseMouse Pad
Razer DeathAdder Wooden Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo e6750 Gigabyte GA-73VM-S2 Sparkle Geforce GT 440 1GB DDR3 OCZ Reapers DDR2 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Caviar Green  Stock Win 7 Ultimutant 2 x ASUS VS238H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Rosewill cheapo "gaming keyboard" ULTRA 400W  None atm Razer Deathadder 
  hide details  
Reply
Sigma
(14 items)
 
NukeBox
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Quad Q9550 GIGABYTE EP45T-USB3P HIS Radeon HD 4870 Turbo G.Skill Ripjaws 7-8-7-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Western Digital Caviar Green Seagate Baracuda Generic DVD Burner Windows 7 Home Premium 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
2 x Asus 23" Rosewill Black normal keyboard Antec TP 750 Antec Nine Hundred 
MouseMouse Pad
Razer DeathAdder Wooden Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo e6750 Gigabyte GA-73VM-S2 Sparkle Geforce GT 440 1GB DDR3 OCZ Reapers DDR2 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Caviar Green  Stock Win 7 Ultimutant 2 x ASUS VS238H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Rosewill cheapo "gaming keyboard" ULTRA 400W  None atm Razer Deathadder 
  hide details  
Reply
post #244 of 7317
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by stalker7d7;13465090 
I've been running Waterfox for about 2 weeks now, and can't say I notice any change in performance over Firefox. Not to say that a difference doesn't exist.

However, the amount of memory it uses over Firefox is inexcusable.

Firefox with 1 tab = 122,340K
Waterfox with same 1 tab = 143,976K
Firefox with 5 tabs = 189,840K
Waterfox with same 5 tabs = 262,404K

Of course, the difference changes depending on what web pages, and other factors. But it remains that Waterfox uses much more memory than Firefox.

And also, of course, they both use much less memory than chrome. ~100,000K less on average when using multiple tabs.

The increase in RAM usage equals to an increase in browser performance. So it is excusable tongue.gif if you depend on your RAM and it is critical that it is used by another application then switch to Chrome or the likes.
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7-4650U Intel HD Graphics 5000 Samsung 8GB DDR3 Samsung 512GB SSD 
OS
Macintosh OS X "Yosemite" 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7-4650U Intel HD Graphics 5000 Samsung 8GB DDR3 Samsung 512GB SSD 
OS
Macintosh OS X "Yosemite" 
  hide details  
Reply
post #245 of 7317
Least I know the ram I paid for is being used up rather sitting doing nothing.
post #246 of 7317
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedMind;13467342 
Least I know the ram I paid for is being used up rather sitting doing nothing.

Well, when using that much more memory, and not having a noticeable performance increase, I'd rather save the extra memory for other things like photoshop and video games...

Then again, when I upgrade to 8 gigs of ram from 4 gigs, I see no problem using waterfox again.
Sigma
(14 items)
 
NukeBox
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Quad Q9550 GIGABYTE EP45T-USB3P HIS Radeon HD 4870 Turbo G.Skill Ripjaws 7-8-7-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Western Digital Caviar Green Seagate Baracuda Generic DVD Burner Windows 7 Home Premium 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
2 x Asus 23" Rosewill Black normal keyboard Antec TP 750 Antec Nine Hundred 
MouseMouse Pad
Razer DeathAdder Wooden Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo e6750 Gigabyte GA-73VM-S2 Sparkle Geforce GT 440 1GB DDR3 OCZ Reapers DDR2 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Caviar Green  Stock Win 7 Ultimutant 2 x ASUS VS238H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Rosewill cheapo "gaming keyboard" ULTRA 400W  None atm Razer Deathadder 
  hide details  
Reply
Sigma
(14 items)
 
NukeBox
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Quad Q9550 GIGABYTE EP45T-USB3P HIS Radeon HD 4870 Turbo G.Skill Ripjaws 7-8-7-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Western Digital Caviar Green Seagate Baracuda Generic DVD Burner Windows 7 Home Premium 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
2 x Asus 23" Rosewill Black normal keyboard Antec TP 750 Antec Nine Hundred 
MouseMouse Pad
Razer DeathAdder Wooden Desk 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo e6750 Gigabyte GA-73VM-S2 Sparkle Geforce GT 440 1GB DDR3 OCZ Reapers DDR2 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
WD Caviar Green  Stock Win 7 Ultimutant 2 x ASUS VS238H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Rosewill cheapo "gaming keyboard" ULTRA 400W  None atm Razer Deathadder 
  hide details  
Reply
post #247 of 7317
Going to give this a try tomorrow.
post #248 of 7317
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by stalker7d7;13475076 
Well, when using that much more memory, and not having a noticeable performance increase, I'd rather save the extra memory for other things like photoshop and video games...

Then again, when I upgrade to 8 gigs of ram from 4 gigs, I see no problem using waterfox again.

For sure, to each their own smile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbudden;13485974 
Going to give this a try tomorrow.

Hope you'll enjoy using it wink.gif
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7-4650U Intel HD Graphics 5000 Samsung 8GB DDR3 Samsung 512GB SSD 
OS
Macintosh OS X "Yosemite" 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7-4650U Intel HD Graphics 5000 Samsung 8GB DDR3 Samsung 512GB SSD 
OS
Macintosh OS X "Yosemite" 
  hide details  
Reply
post #249 of 7317
I should probably thank you as I've been using Waterfox for at least a month and it is the best browser I've ever used. Flawless (aside from one or two annoying little flash bugs but that irrelevant to this.)

about to download 4.1
post #250 of 7317
Unfortunately, it didn't work.
But that's not just a Waterfox thing.
I have been trying to install Firefox 4 on my parents computer, but it instantly crashes upon opening.
Same happens with your program. I thought Waterfox would fix it, but I guess not.

I would love to try it out, but I'm using Linux. frown.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Other Software
Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 54.0.1: 15 Jly [Firefox 64-Bit]