Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 56.0.1: 13 December [Free, open and private web browser.]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Waterfox 56.0.1: 13 December [Free, open and private web browser.] - Page 463

post #4621 of 7372
the link in the op to downloads is broken i think is what he was getting at. thumb.gif

link points to http://www.waterfoxproject.org/downloads which gives a 404
Edited by pvt.joker - 1/22/13 at 1:32pm
Loki
(18 items)
 
 
Odin (fileserver)
(15 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 5930k MSI X99A SLI Krait eVGA GTX 980 Ti G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 840 Evo 1tb Samsung 950 Pro M.2 512gb Asus BW-12B1ST Corsair H100 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Enterprise 3x Dell U2412M in Nvidia Surround Das Keyboard v4 Professional Corsair RM1000i 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Fractal Design R5 Logitech G502 Proteus Core Glorious PC Gaming Race XXL Asus Xonar DX 
AudioAudio
Sennheiser HD 650 HiFiMan EF2A 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3630QM Lenovo Ideapad Y500 GTX 650 SLI Kingston 16gb DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Mushkin Atlas 120gb mSATA SSD Samsung 830 256gb SSD Windows 7 Professional SP1 Lenovo Ideapad Y500 15.6" 1920x1080 full HD dis... 
Keyboard
Lenovo red backlit 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
Xeon X5650 Xeon X5650 Supermicro X8DTL-iF-O Galaxy GT210 1gb 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
96gb DDR3 ECC Corsair Force 3 60gb (boot) 3TB Hitachi x 12 1TB Hitachi x 12 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
Noctua NH-U12DX Noctua NH-U12DX Windows Server 2012 R2 Corsair HX 1050 
CaseOtherOther
Norco RPC 4224 LSI Megaraid Sas 9261-8I Intel RES2CV240 20 Port SAS Expander 
  hide details  
Reply
Loki
(18 items)
 
 
Odin (fileserver)
(15 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 5930k MSI X99A SLI Krait eVGA GTX 980 Ti G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 840 Evo 1tb Samsung 950 Pro M.2 512gb Asus BW-12B1ST Corsair H100 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Enterprise 3x Dell U2412M in Nvidia Surround Das Keyboard v4 Professional Corsair RM1000i 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Fractal Design R5 Logitech G502 Proteus Core Glorious PC Gaming Race XXL Asus Xonar DX 
AudioAudio
Sennheiser HD 650 HiFiMan EF2A 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3630QM Lenovo Ideapad Y500 GTX 650 SLI Kingston 16gb DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Mushkin Atlas 120gb mSATA SSD Samsung 830 256gb SSD Windows 7 Professional SP1 Lenovo Ideapad Y500 15.6" 1920x1080 full HD dis... 
Keyboard
Lenovo red backlit 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
Xeon X5650 Xeon X5650 Supermicro X8DTL-iF-O Galaxy GT210 1gb 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
96gb DDR3 ECC Corsair Force 3 60gb (boot) 3TB Hitachi x 12 1TB Hitachi x 12 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
Noctua NH-U12DX Noctua NH-U12DX Windows Server 2012 R2 Corsair HX 1050 
CaseOtherOther
Norco RPC 4224 LSI Megaraid Sas 9261-8I Intel RES2CV240 20 Port SAS Expander 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4622 of 7372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsu24 View Post

Well, I just ran the sunspider benchmark and the performance drop of Waterfox doesn't seem to be related to js ... but this is not a very in-depth test, I don't have the time or energy to run a couple of benchmarks multiple times taking the average.

Waterfox 18: 355ms (100%)
Nightly 21: 402ms (12% slower)
Cyberfox 18: 350ms (1% faster)

I got vastly different results using sunspider

Waterfox

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
Total: 196.6ms +/- 17.0%

3d: 45.8ms +/- 71.4%
cube: 12.3ms +/- 12.0%
morph: 18.4ms +/- 170.1%
raytrace: 15.1ms +/- 11.7%

access: 15.3ms +/- 10.1%
binary-trees: 2.2ms +/- 13.7%
fannkuch: 7.3ms +/- 13.1%
nbody: 2.9ms +/- 14.0%
nsieve: 2.9ms +/- 14.0%

bitops: 10.1ms +/- 5.2%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 0.9ms +/- 25.1%
bits-in-byte: 3.3ms +/- 10.5%
bitwise-and: 2.9ms +/- 7.8%
nsieve-bits: 3.0ms +/- 0.0%

controlflow: 2.2ms +/- 13.7%
recursive: 2.2ms +/- 13.7%

crypto: 20.1ms +/- 2.0%
aes: 9.1ms +/- 2.5%
md5: 7.6ms +/- 4.9%
sha1: 3.4ms +/- 14.7%

date: 27.3ms +/- 9.6%
format-tofte: 17.1ms +/- 13.9%
format-xparb: 10.2ms +/- 3.0%

math: 12.4ms +/- 4.0%
cordic: 2.6ms +/- 14.2%
partial-sums: 6.9ms +/- 3.3%
spectral-norm: 2.9ms +/- 7.8%

regexp: 9.2ms +/- 8.0%
dna: 9.2ms +/- 8.0%

string: 54.2ms +/- 22.4%
base64: 4.3ms +/- 15.8%
fasta: 6.5ms +/- 14.0%
tagcloud: 14.1ms +/- 17.6%
unpack-code: 21.9ms +/- 30.1%
validate-input: 7.4ms +/- 43.0%

waterfox benchmark link : http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/results.html?%7B%22v%22:%20%22sunspider-0.9.1%22,%20%223d-cube%22:%5B12,18,11,12,12,12,11,12,12,11%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B5,4,4,5,4,5,5,4,5,143%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B14,14,14,15,14,14,14,15,15,22%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B2,2,3,2,2,2,2,2,2,3%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B6,11,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B3,4,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B3,4,3,2,3,3,3,3,2,3%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,1%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B3,3,4,3,4,3,3,4,3,3%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B3,3,3,3,3,2,3,3,3,3%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B2,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,2%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B9,10,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B8,7,7,8,8,8,8,8,7,7%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B3,3,5,3,3,3,3,4,4,3%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B16,15,19,15,16,26,16,16,16,16%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B10,10,11,10,10,11,10,10,10,10%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B3,3,3,2,3,2,3,2,2,3%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B7,7,7,7,7,6,7,7,7,7%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B3,3,3,3,2,3,3,3,3,3%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B8,9,9,9,9,9,12,9,9,9%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B4,4,4,4,4,4,7,4,4,4%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B6,6,6,6,6,6,10,6,7,6%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B24,13,13,13,13,13,13,13,13,13%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B48,18,19,18,19,18,19,20,19,21%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B20,6,5,6,6,6,6,6,6,7%5D%7D


Cyberfox

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
Total: 178.1ms +/- 1.6%

3d: 31.5ms +/- 4.9%
cube: 12.1ms +/- 1.9%
morph: 4.5ms +/- 8.4%
raytrace: 14.9ms +/- 8.9%

access: 14.2ms +/- 5.2%
binary-trees: 2.2ms +/- 13.7%
fannkuch: 6.5ms +/- 5.8%
nbody: 2.7ms +/- 12.8%
nsieve: 2.8ms +/- 10.8%

bitops: 9.7ms +/- 6.1%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 0.6ms +/- 61.5%
bits-in-byte: 3.2ms +/- 9.4%
bitwise-and: 2.9ms +/- 7.8%
nsieve-bits: 3.0ms +/- 0.0%

controlflow: 2.3ms +/- 15.0%
recursive: 2.3ms +/- 15.0%

crypto: 20.3ms +/- 3.3%
aes: 9.6ms +/- 5.2%
md5: 7.5ms +/- 5.0%
sha1: 3.2ms +/- 9.4%

date: 27.3ms +/- 1.8%
format-tofte: 17.2ms +/- 2.6%
format-xparb: 10.1ms +/- 2.2%

math: 11.8ms +/- 3.8%
cordic: 2.2ms +/- 13.7%
partial-sums: 7.3ms +/- 4.7%
spectral-norm: 2.3ms +/- 15.0%

regexp: 9.5ms +/- 4.0%
dna: 9.5ms +/- 4.0%

string: 51.5ms +/- 3.0%
base64: 3.9ms +/- 5.8%
fasta: 5.8ms +/- 5.2%
tagcloud: 14.2ms +/- 2.1%
unpack-code: 21.2ms +/- 6.3%
validate-input: 6.4ms +/- 5.8%

Cyberfox benchmark link: http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/results.html?%7B%22v%22:%20%22sunspider-0.9.1%22,%20%223d-cube%22:%5B13,12,12,12,12,12,12,12,12,12%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B5,4,5,5,4,4,5,5,4,4%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B15,14,14,15,14,15,14,20,14,14%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B3,2,3,2,2,2,2,2,2,2%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B7,7,6,6,6,6,7,7,6,7%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B2,3,3,3,3,3,3,2,2,3%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B3,3,3,3,3,3,3,2,2,3%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B0,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,0,1%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B3,3,4,3,3,3,4,3,3,3%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B3,3,3,3,3,3,3,2,3,3%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B2,2,3,2,2,2,3,3,2,2%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B11,9,9,9,10,9,9,10,10,10%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B8,7,8,8,8,8,7,7,7,7%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B3,3,3,4,3,3,3,4,3,3%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B18,17,17,17,18,16,17,18,17,17%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,11,10%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B2,2,3,2,2,2,3,2,2,2%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B8,7,7,8,7,7,7,8,7,7%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B2,2,2,2,3,3,2,3,2,2%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B9,10,10,9,10,9,10,9,10,9%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B4,4,4,4,4,4,3,4,4,4%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B5,6,6,6,6,5,6,6,6,6%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B14,14,14,14,15,14,14,15,14,14%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B20,19,19,19,22,21,22,23,23,24%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B6,7,6,6,6,7,7,6,7,6%5D%7D

Firefox Nightly 21.0a1

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
Total: 156.0ms +/- 1.6%

3d: 25.2ms +/- 2.2%
cube: 9.1ms +/- 2.5%
morph: 4.1ms +/- 5.5%
raytrace: 12.0ms +/- 2.8%

access: 12.2ms +/- 8.6%
binary-trees: 1.7ms +/- 20.3%
fannkuch: 5.7ms +/- 6.1%
nbody: 2.4ms +/- 15.4%
nsieve: 2.4ms +/- 15.4%

bitops: 8.9ms +/- 8.8%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 0.6ms +/- 61.5%
bits-in-byte: 2.7ms +/- 12.8%
bitwise-and: 2.8ms +/- 10.8%
nsieve-bits: 2.8ms +/- 10.8%

controlflow: 1.6ms +/- 23.1%
recursive: 1.6ms +/- 23.1%

crypto: 17.4ms +/- 2.9%
aes: 8.0ms +/- 0.0%
md5: 6.5ms +/- 5.8%
sha1: 2.9ms +/- 7.8%

date: 19.5ms +/- 2.6%
format-tofte: 11.8ms +/- 2.6%
format-xparb: 7.7ms +/- 4.5%

math: 14.4ms +/- 3.5%
cordic: 2.0ms +/- 0.0%
partial-sums: 9.9ms +/- 2.3%
spectral-norm: 2.5ms +/- 15.1%

regexp: 9.0ms +/- 0.0%
dna: 9.0ms +/- 0.0%

string: 47.8ms +/- 1.2%
base64: 3.5ms +/- 10.8%
fasta: 4.9ms +/- 4.6%
tagcloud: 12.7ms +/- 2.7%
unpack-code: 14.9ms +/- 2.7%
validate-input: 11.8ms +/- 2.6%

Firefox benchmark link: http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/results.html?%7B%22v%22:%20%22sunspider-0.9.1%22,%20%223d-cube%22:%5B9,9,9,9,9,9,10,9,9,9%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B4,4,4,4,4,5,4,4,4,4%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B12,12,12,11,12,12,13,12,12,12%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,2%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B6,5,6,6,6,6,6,6,5,5%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B2,2,3,2,2,3,2,3,2,3%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B2,2,2,2,3,3,2,3,2,3%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B1,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,1,1%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B3,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,2,3%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B3,3,2,3,2,3,3,3,3,3%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B2,2,1,1,2,1,1,2,2,2%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B7,6,7,7,6,6,7,6,6,7%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,2,3%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B12,12,12,11,12,12,12,11,12,12%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B8,8,8,7,8,7,8,8,8,7%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B10,9,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B3,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,2,2%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B3,3,4,4,3,4,4,3,4,3%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,4,5%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B13,12,12,13,13,13,13,13,12,13%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B14,15,14,15,15,15,16,15,15,15%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B12,12,12,11,12,12,11,12,12,12%5D%7D

Firefox Nightly 21.0a1 is faster then both by quite a bit.
post #4623 of 7372
Also better scores for being a long away beta still in peacekeeper as well

Firefox nightly 21.0a1 peacekeeper score

post #4624 of 7372
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderStruck-1 View Post

Firefox Nightly 21.0a1 is faster then both by quite a bit.

No idea about Nightly, I re-ran Sunspider again, same result - but it doesn't really matter because I switched from Nightly to Waterfox because sometimes addons aren't compatible with the latest trunk. And considering the "stable" 64-bit builds it seems safe to say that Waterfox is slower then Cyberfox in v18.0.1...
post #4625 of 7372
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderStruck-1 View Post

Palemoon Benchmark
Your installation is messed up...

post #4626 of 7372
Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard View Post

Your installation is messed up...

... or your box is just faster - if you post a benchmark it should be the whole Firefox/Waterfox/... combination or it's quite worthless.
post #4627 of 7372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsu24 View Post

... or your box is just faster - if you post a benchmark it should be the whole Firefox/Waterfox/... combination or it's quite worthless.
My score is 137% higher than yours. That's not normal, especially for such poorly threaded tests.
Last time I tested PM was considerably faster than FF. You're doing something wrong.
post #4628 of 7372
Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard View Post

Your installation is messed up...


I don't have issues with setups I run 4 computers 2 AMD 2 Intel I develop and test programs on a daily basis, Tests are run on browsers coming straight from the developer as is to benchmark as it would not be fair to tweak one browser and not the others or tweak some and not others. The results are identical on 4 different rigs with the odd variance of a bit lower or higher due to different hardware as the benchmarks take into account the hardware you also run so a machine with a more powerful gfx card will give off higher marks then a machine with a less powerful gfx card and so forth. The results end up even across 4 different machines.
post #4629 of 7372
On my notebook, WF is faster than CF.
Peacekepper with empty profil:
WF: 967
CF: 907
Please check your PC, use empty profil and retry test.
And I have not crashing of WF since 18.

Pentium M 1.7Ghz
3Go RAM(2700Mo/s Memory band).
post #4630 of 7372
Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsu24 View Post

... or your box is just faster - if you post a benchmark it should be the whole Firefox/Waterfox/... combination or it's quite worthless.
My score is 137% higher than yours. That's not normal, especially for such poorly threaded tests.
Last time I tested PM was considerably faster than FF. You're doing something wrong.

Of course your score on a fast desktop system can be much faster then on a slow laptop (like mine), and btw I didn't run the test you were commenting on. And the latest Nightly switching places is absolutely possible since ff development goes on and Nightly is the bleeding edge trunk. I'm afraid to say both your comments don't really strengthen my trust in you running valid benchmarks :-o
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Other Software
Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 56.0.1: 13 December [Free, open and private web browser.]