Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 56.0.1: 13 December [Free, open and private web browser.]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Waterfox 56.0.1: 13 December [Free, open and private web browser.] - Page 601

post #6001 of 7372
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldroll View Post

I even uninstalled Waterfox and restarted with a fresh copy and this issue still persists, so it must be caused by something in the new update.
That's odd, I reverted to 30 and it fixed all the issues 31 had confusedsmiley.png
Core i7 Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 930 @ 2.93 GHz Gigabyte X58A-UD3R (Rev. 1.0) PALIT GTX 760 Jetstream 12GB DDR3 1600 Mhz (6x2GB) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 830 Samsung HD103UJ Samsung HD103SJ Samsung HD204UI 
Optical DriveOSMonitorPower
LiteOn iHAS524 DVD RW Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1 ViewSonic VX2260WM Seasonic X-Series 650W SS-650KM3 
Case
Cooler Master 690 II Advanced RC-692A-KKN5 
  hide details  
Reply
Core i7 Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 930 @ 2.93 GHz Gigabyte X58A-UD3R (Rev. 1.0) PALIT GTX 760 Jetstream 12GB DDR3 1600 Mhz (6x2GB) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 830 Samsung HD103UJ Samsung HD103SJ Samsung HD204UI 
Optical DriveOSMonitorPower
LiteOn iHAS524 DVD RW Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1 ViewSonic VX2260WM Seasonic X-Series 650W SS-650KM3 
Case
Cooler Master 690 II Advanced RC-692A-KKN5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6002 of 7372
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsc1973 View Post

If I wanted something that looks and works like Chrome, I'd just use Chrome.

Thank God that the Pale Moon devs are sticking to the old FF layout.
Yes, I moved to Pale Moon as well. Took me a while to fix all the interface to make it as space efficient as possible, but 2 days later everything is nearly perfect and performance is leaps and bounds beyond Waterfox:
733e8a4780.png
post #6003 of 7372
I use Firefox on my laptop, and I can't say I've noticed FF 31 giving me any real speed issues. PM (which I use on my desktop) has also been updated to include the security fixes, and I haven't really noticed any sluggishness from it, so it may be the Intel compiler did not compile something properly with WF 31?
4690K System
(12 items)
 
HTPC
(9 items)
 
HP dv6 laptop
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 4690K ASRock Z97 Extreme4 XFX Radeon 7950 32 GB DDR3-2133 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 EVO SSD Samsung DVD/CD-writer Corsair Hydro H60 Windows 7 
MonitorMonitorPowerCase
ASUS PA248Q Dell U2412M XFX 850W Black Edition XXX Fractal Design Arc Midi 2 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium Dual Core E6700 MSI G41M-P33 Combo ATI HD4350 Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1333 
RAMHard DriveOSMonitor
Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1333 WD Caviar Blue Windows 7 64-bit Sony 32" TV set 
Case
Apex TX-381 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core i5 430M GT230M (1 Gb dedicated) 8 GB DDR3-1066 640 GB 
OSMonitor
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit) 15.6" 
  hide details  
Reply
4690K System
(12 items)
 
HTPC
(9 items)
 
HP dv6 laptop
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 4690K ASRock Z97 Extreme4 XFX Radeon 7950 32 GB DDR3-2133 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 EVO SSD Samsung DVD/CD-writer Corsair Hydro H60 Windows 7 
MonitorMonitorPowerCase
ASUS PA248Q Dell U2412M XFX 850W Black Edition XXX Fractal Design Arc Midi 2 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium Dual Core E6700 MSI G41M-P33 Combo ATI HD4350 Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1333 
RAMHard DriveOSMonitor
Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1333 WD Caviar Blue Windows 7 64-bit Sony 32" TV set 
Case
Apex TX-381 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core i5 430M GT230M (1 Gb dedicated) 8 GB DDR3-1066 640 GB 
OSMonitor
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit) 15.6" 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6004 of 7372
Yeah Firefox 31 seems to run fine for me but Waterfox 31 runs terribly.
post #6005 of 7372
Just recently changed to waterfox on my laptop sick of chrome bloat and google tracking everything since i updated to 31 seems to go unresponsive a hell a lot more then 30. frown.gif
post #6006 of 7372
Oh why did I update? The last version ran perfect, this thing lags so bad that I'm thinking of uninstalling...
Potato
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3570k + H110i GT ASRock Extreme4 EVGA GTX 1070 Hybrid Samsung 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
250GB Samsung SSD (OS)  960GB Micron SSD (games/apps) (2) 2TB Hitachi Ultrastar 2TB Western Digital Black 
OSKeyboardPowerMouse
Win 10 Pro Corsair K70 + custom keys/ dampeners Corsair CX600 G602 + G5 
Audio
DT990 Pro 250 Ohm 
  hide details  
Reply
Potato
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3570k + H110i GT ASRock Extreme4 EVGA GTX 1070 Hybrid Samsung 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
250GB Samsung SSD (OS)  960GB Micron SSD (games/apps) (2) 2TB Hitachi Ultrastar 2TB Western Digital Black 
OSKeyboardPowerMouse
Win 10 Pro Corsair K70 + custom keys/ dampeners Corsair CX600 G602 + G5 
Audio
DT990 Pro 250 Ohm 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6007 of 7372
I've been noticing Pale Moon has been having trouble with a couple of websites recently, and I'm wondering if something related to the base firefox code updates may be at fault.
4690K System
(12 items)
 
HTPC
(9 items)
 
HP dv6 laptop
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 4690K ASRock Z97 Extreme4 XFX Radeon 7950 32 GB DDR3-2133 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 EVO SSD Samsung DVD/CD-writer Corsair Hydro H60 Windows 7 
MonitorMonitorPowerCase
ASUS PA248Q Dell U2412M XFX 850W Black Edition XXX Fractal Design Arc Midi 2 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium Dual Core E6700 MSI G41M-P33 Combo ATI HD4350 Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1333 
RAMHard DriveOSMonitor
Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1333 WD Caviar Blue Windows 7 64-bit Sony 32" TV set 
Case
Apex TX-381 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core i5 430M GT230M (1 Gb dedicated) 8 GB DDR3-1066 640 GB 
OSMonitor
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit) 15.6" 
  hide details  
Reply
4690K System
(12 items)
 
HTPC
(9 items)
 
HP dv6 laptop
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 4690K ASRock Z97 Extreme4 XFX Radeon 7950 32 GB DDR3-2133 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 EVO SSD Samsung DVD/CD-writer Corsair Hydro H60 Windows 7 
MonitorMonitorPowerCase
ASUS PA248Q Dell U2412M XFX 850W Black Edition XXX Fractal Design Arc Midi 2 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium Dual Core E6700 MSI G41M-P33 Combo ATI HD4350 Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1333 
RAMHard DriveOSMonitor
Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1333 WD Caviar Blue Windows 7 64-bit Sony 32" TV set 
Case
Apex TX-381 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core i5 430M GT230M (1 Gb dedicated) 8 GB DDR3-1066 640 GB 
OSMonitor
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit) 15.6" 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6008 of 7372
No problems here, so far... No sluggishness, no crash, flash videos running normally blushsmiley.gifblushsmiley.gif
post #6009 of 7372
Well I tried using this latest version of Waterfox and It's too slow for me so looks like I'm back to using Firefox until they fix it, uninstalled . (EDIT 5 minutes later...) Just installed the latest version of Firefox no problems whatsoever with performance.
Edited by coldroll - 8/1/14 at 2:41pm
post #6010 of 7372
false
Quote:
Originally Posted by bIOforger View Post

Uninstalled V31 and back on v30 again, all is fine once more.
Forget that, I'm going back to 28.0. I like that design, it didn't give many problems, and it liked my 64-bit computer just fine. Until the memory leaks are fixed, and the Waterfox menu in the top left corner is brought back, as well as the Add-on bar, I'm sticking to 28.0.
Edited by CPUOverclock - 8/1/14 at 9:07pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Other Software
Overclock.net › Forums › Software, Programming and Coding › Other Software › Waterfox 56.0.1: 13 December [Free, open and private web browser.]