Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › i7 2600k vs x6 1055t
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

i7 2600k vs x6 1055t - Page 12  

post #111 of 236
Says the guy who bought a cpu that is slower and paid more for it just recently.

I'd totally go with whatever you felt was a good deal. Can you create a shopping cart with what you'd consider "great buys of 2011"?
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
post #112 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horsemama1956 View Post
What you said though was a 15-20% difference(comparable to first gen i7 NOT Phenom II) is not noticeable unless you're a delusional Intel fanboy troll.

That's pretty significant insight. Learned lots.
Glad to be of service.
post #113 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by BallaTheFeared View Post
Says the guy who bought a cpu that is slower and paid more for it just recently.

I'd totally go with whatever you felt was a good deal. Can you create a shopping cart with what you'd consider "great buys of 2011"?
Ummm....Who are you talking to?
post #114 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsm106 View Post
Translated, "yea SB is faster, but it still sucks" lol c'mon.
Nope, never said it sucks. Might even build one myself soon.
Oxygène
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 5 1600 Asus Prime B350 Plus VTX3D R9 390 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Kingston Hyper X Kingston HyperX Fury ADATA SP550 ADATA SX8000 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Stock Windows 10 Dell U2711 Razer BlackWidow Tournament Edition 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Chieftec A-135 Series 1000W NZXT. Phantom 410 Razer DeathAdder Razer Goliathus Speed Edition 
  hide details  
Oxygène
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 5 1600 Asus Prime B350 Plus VTX3D R9 390 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Kingston Hyper X Kingston HyperX Fury ADATA SP550 ADATA SX8000 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Stock Windows 10 Dell U2711 Razer BlackWidow Tournament Edition 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Chieftec A-135 Series 1000W NZXT. Phantom 410 Razer DeathAdder Razer Goliathus Speed Edition 
  hide details  
post #115 of 236
Oh God thats too much, hahaahahahaha.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
post #116 of 236
I have no proof of ever owning a thuban.Hmmm....

My phenomx6 thread

Also going from 50% to 100% GPU usage is stupid your right. What was I thinking, wanting to get the performance I paid for...
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
post #117 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horsemama1956 View Post
Honestly, I doubt BD for $300 is going to match up with the 2600k. If it could, AMD wouldn't hide that fact. That makes no sense to me.
I don't understand why so many people are underestimating Bulldozer... I guess no one notices that Bulldozer is a whole NEW architecture. Which means new instructions such as SSE4. They've been using the same AMD64 architecture since 2003!!!

People are complaining that AMD is just adding more cores to beat Intel is completely wrong... AMD will be calling their processors which actually have 2 cores a Quad Core which have 4 Modules (2 in each Core). Which means AMD cut the cost of creating these processors.

They also added a feature that lets us completely shut down unused cores.
Maximus
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 6700K 4.8Ghz @ 1.4v Maximus VIII Formula Radeon RX VEGA 64 G-Skill 32GB 3424Mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB Raid 0 Corsair H100i V2 Windows 10 Pro Acer XF270HUA 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX Board 6.0 Seasonic X-850 Lian-Li PC-V33B Logitech G600 
Mouse PadAudioAudio
Alugraphics GamerArt Definitive Technology Incline SMSL M8  
  hide details  
Maximus
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 6700K 4.8Ghz @ 1.4v Maximus VIII Formula Radeon RX VEGA 64 G-Skill 32GB 3424Mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB Raid 0 Corsair H100i V2 Windows 10 Pro Acer XF270HUA 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX Board 6.0 Seasonic X-850 Lian-Li PC-V33B Logitech G600 
Mouse PadAudioAudio
Alugraphics GamerArt Definitive Technology Incline SMSL M8  
  hide details  
post #118 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimaggio1103 View Post
I have no proof of ever owning a thuban.Hmmm....

My phenomx6 thread

Also going from 50% to 100% GPU usage is stupid your right. What was I thinking, wanting to get the performance I paid for...
Touche, I'll give you a rep for that.
post #119 of 236
No.

Sorry.

Read more on it, you misunderstand, go ask JF-AMD.

The 4 core bulldozer cpu will have 2 modules, the eight core bulldozer cpu will have 4 modules.

Each module has two cores, these two cores share resources which is where they saved money and die space.

You take a full fledged core and take 20% of its performance away, its going to be 20% slower than a full fledged core.

However even though they share resources those two cores can not share a thread. Work load can not be divided between the two of them.
Edited by BallaTheFeared - 4/5/11 at 1:16pm
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
post #120 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaBeOCer View Post
I don't understand why so many people are underestimating Bulldozer... I guess no one notices that Bulldozer is a whole NEW architecture. Which means new instructions such as SSE4. They've been using the same AMD64 architecture since 2003!!!

People are complaining that AMD is just adding more cores to beat Intel is completely wrong... AMD will be calling their processors which actually have 2 cores a Quad Core which have 4 Modules (2 in each Core). Which means AMD cut the cost of creating these processors.

They also added a feature that lets us completely shut down unused cores.
Splitting one core to act like two core hmm...somebody help me out here doesn't that sound familiar?....
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › i7 2600k vs x6 1055t