At a first meeting with Rossi at the end of February they were given access to a sample of the pure nickel powder, intended for use in the energy catalyzer, and another sample of nickel powder which, according to Rossi, had been used in the reactor for 2.5 months.
Their analyses showed that the pure powder consists of essentially pure nickel, while the used powder contains several other substances, mainly 10 percent copper and 11 percent iron.
"Provided that copper is not one of the additives used as catalyst, the copper isotopes 63 and 65 can only have been formed during the process. Their presence is therefore a proof that nuclear reactions took place in the process," Kullander said (see further details below).
At least this seemingly passed another step and is closer to being proven. Only time will tell, though, as the scientific peer review process may prove this to be shenanigans.
You lot do know that there have been THOUSANDS of free energy devices made but EVERY SINGLE ONE gets brought off buy the oil company's to suppress it, same will happen to this.
Originally Posted by rick19011;13029480
You lot do know that there have been THOUSANDS of free energy devices made but EVERY SINGLE ONE gets brought off buy the oil company's to suppress it, same will happen to this.
Free energy eh? I think thermodynamics disproves that, and cold fusion isn't free, it's a nuclear reaction. And if I made a free energy device, I just wouldn't sell it to them
I was about to say the same thing. The fact that you have an almost equal amount of fe and cu means that a transfer occurred somehow, but I thought fusion had to be the combining of two whole nuclei?
You lot do know that there have been THOUSANDS of free energy devices made but EVERY SINGLE ONE gets brought off buy the oil company's to suppress it, same will happen to this.
I facepalmed so hard I broke my right zygomatic arch.
Originally Posted by rick19011;13029480
You lot do know that there have been THOUSANDS of free energy devices made but EVERY SINGLE ONE gets brought off buy the oil company's to suppress it, same will happen to this.
Any step forward is a step in the right direction. When/if we master cold fusion, we really could tremendously reduce reliance on fossil fuels. We can never be completely free of them due to plastics, but if we stop using oil as a power source and only as a resource for production, it's useful lifespan would be immensely multiplied.
You lot do know that there have been THOUSANDS of free energy devices made but EVERY SINGLE ONE gets brought off buy the oil company's to suppress it, same will happen to this.
You lot do know that there have been THOUSANDS of free energy devices made but EVERY SINGLE ONE gets brought off buy the oil company's to suppress it, same will happen to this.
fail, they don't work, even Mythbusters tested them
Originally Posted by rick19011;13029480
You lot do know that there have been THOUSANDS of free energy devices made but EVERY SINGLE ONE gets brought off buy the oil company's to suppress it, same will happen to this.
You lot do know that there have been THOUSANDS of free energy devices made but EVERY SINGLE ONE gets brought off buy the oil company's to suppress it, same will happen to this.
fail, they don't work, even Mythbusters tested them
I have ZERO faith in those mythbusting shows after there was a discussion in one of my threads on OCN about recycling and people kept referencing Penn & Teller's 'Bull****'.....sadly their stance itself was BS and they cherrypicked a lot of facts in order for those facts to support their incorrect notion that recycling does more harm than good.
Didn't buy it the first time it was announced, still not buying it now. After multiple people can evaluate this--and more importantly, reconstruct the experiment from independent parts--it's still not credible. Any why has it taken 3 months to have someone evaluate it, and why behind closed doors? It's all very suspicious. Still.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!