Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › [HWC] F@H Core 16 on AMD GPUs
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[HWC] F@H Core 16 on AMD GPUs - Page 3

post #21 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIMPSONATOR View Post
Why? This thread is for the dicussion of the news article, and how AMD will gain PPD.
It be a nice comparison to see how far AMD still needs to go.

100% is a nice jump, but it is still far behind. :/ Considering how SP and DP performance on the Radeon cards surpase what Nvidia offers.
post #22 of 35
Those results look pretty accurate. I'm getting ~6400 PPD on a stock HD6850 and 7000-7100 @ 850Mhz core. The results are decent, but a GTS450 still spanks it It's progress though!
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7 6700HQ nVidia GTX 965m 16GB DDR4-2133 120GB M.2.SSD 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
480GB Crucial M500 Windows 10 Pro Dell Ultrasharp u2713hm Corsair Vengeance K70 
MouseAudio
Logitech G600 Creative T20 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i7 6700HQ nVidia GTX 965m 16GB DDR4-2133 120GB M.2.SSD 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
480GB Crucial M500 Windows 10 Pro Dell Ultrasharp u2713hm Corsair Vengeance K70 
MouseAudio
Logitech G600 Creative T20 
  hide details  
Reply
post #23 of 35
Also heard some people are running 2 core 16's on 1 5850 or higher, since it is somehow better PPD. Because AMD cards are better at those kind of calculations. Nvidia didnt seem to fully ultilize this architecture. I think theres a post somewhere here.

EDIT: http://www.overclock.net/overclock-n...s-2-cards.html
Gaming 2016
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 6700K Gigabyte Z170M-D3H MSI GTX1070 8G ARMOR Kingston HyperX FURY DDR4 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 840 Evo Samsung 850 Evo Seagate SHHD Cooler Master Nepton 240M 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Pro XB321HK Logitech 710 Corsair RM550x 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Cooler Master Silencio 352 Logitech G500 Razer Goliathus Presonus Eris 4.5 
  hide details  
Reply
Gaming 2016
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 6700K Gigabyte Z170M-D3H MSI GTX1070 8G ARMOR Kingston HyperX FURY DDR4 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 840 Evo Samsung 850 Evo Seagate SHHD Cooler Master Nepton 240M 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Pro XB321HK Logitech 710 Corsair RM550x 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Cooler Master Silencio 352 Logitech G500 Razer Goliathus Presonus Eris 4.5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #24 of 35
seems still pretty low, will be interesting to see how much more they can squeeze out of these cards
myrig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4790k ASUS Maximus VII Hero Z97 XFX RX480 GTR 2x8GB Gskill 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 3 H2O Win7 64bit Optoma Beamer 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry G80-3000LPCEU-0 Corsair 850W HAF-X Roccat Tyon 
AudioAudio
Onkyo TX-RZ900 Magnat Shadow 209 + 213 
  hide details  
Reply
myrig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4790k ASUS Maximus VII Hero Z97 XFX RX480 GTR 2x8GB Gskill 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 3 H2O Win7 64bit Optoma Beamer 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry G80-3000LPCEU-0 Corsair 850W HAF-X Roccat Tyon 
AudioAudio
Onkyo TX-RZ900 Magnat Shadow 209 + 213 
  hide details  
Reply
post #25 of 35
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domino View Post
It be a nice comparison to see how far AMD still needs to go.

100% is a nice jump, but it is still far behind. :/ Considering how SP and DP performance on the Radeon cards surpase what Nvidia offers.
But as mentioned in the article we should see better performance with future updates to the client. The potential for the performance is there.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500k @ 4300Mhz Biostar TP67XE Waiting to buy a new one 8GB 1600Mhz 7-8-7-21 1T 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 840 SSD [250GB] Antec H20 620 Windows 7 x64 Acer S242HL 
PowerCase
Thermaltake 775W NZXT Phantom [White] 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500k @ 4300Mhz Biostar TP67XE Waiting to buy a new one 8GB 1600Mhz 7-8-7-21 1T 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 840 SSD [250GB] Antec H20 620 Windows 7 x64 Acer S242HL 
PowerCase
Thermaltake 775W NZXT Phantom [White] 
  hide details  
Reply
post #26 of 35
Im running 3 Clients right now.
1)SMP-5 on my 1055t@3.9GHz
2)GPU3 on my 5770
3)Standard CPU client on my work comp (Core2-not sure model number)


Today will be the first day with all 3 running in this config, yesterday i got 17k without advanced GPU client.
HAL 9000
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1055T Asus M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 XFX/Sapph HD5770 Crossfire 8GB 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
Crucial C300 64GB, WD Black 1TB 22" + 23" Ultra 750W Cool Master HAF 922 
  hide details  
Reply
HAL 9000
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1055T Asus M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 XFX/Sapph HD5770 Crossfire 8GB 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
Crucial C300 64GB, WD Black 1TB 22" + 23" Ultra 750W Cool Master HAF 922 
  hide details  
Reply
post #27 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domino View Post
Could we get a comparison to what Nvidia can handle?
They're still a lot slower... reason is probably poor programming I would guess, theoretically AMD cards should be faster but it hasn't worked out that way in practice yet.
Truck
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2700K Intel DP67BG SLI 2x Zotac 570 Reference 16GB G.Skill 1600MHz / 1.25v 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 2TB / OCZ Solid3 128GB Vista Pro 7 x64 / Ubuntu 22.5" Acer LCD Dollarstore special 
PowerCaseMouse
OCZ Z-Series 1000w Coolermaster HAF 922 w/ 5x YL high speeds Logitech with red light camera laser 
  hide details  
Reply
Truck
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2700K Intel DP67BG SLI 2x Zotac 570 Reference 16GB G.Skill 1600MHz / 1.25v 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 2TB / OCZ Solid3 128GB Vista Pro 7 x64 / Ubuntu 22.5" Acer LCD Dollarstore special 
PowerCaseMouse
OCZ Z-Series 1000w Coolermaster HAF 922 w/ 5x YL high speeds Logitech with red light camera laser 
  hide details  
Reply
post #28 of 35
v7 client doesnt show PPD on my 5770. my 1055t is getting 1806PPD without bonuses. running on 5 cores to give one to the GPU
HAL 9000
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1055T Asus M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 XFX/Sapph HD5770 Crossfire 8GB 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
Crucial C300 64GB, WD Black 1TB 22" + 23" Ultra 750W Cool Master HAF 922 
  hide details  
Reply
HAL 9000
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1055T Asus M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 XFX/Sapph HD5770 Crossfire 8GB 
Hard DriveMonitorPowerCase
Crucial C300 64GB, WD Black 1TB 22" + 23" Ultra 750W Cool Master HAF 922 
  hide details  
Reply
post #29 of 35
Look out EVGA folders!

Their main advantage is all of their folders mostly use Nvidia cards, once ATi cards are on par then PC enthusiast forums like ours will inch a bit closer to their output.
Foldatron
(17 items)
 
Mat
(10 items)
 
Work iMac
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 950 EVGA x58 3-way SLI EVGA GTX 660ti GTX 275 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 80GB Intel X25-M SSD 2TB WD Black 150GB WD Raptor 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x 150GB WD V-raptor in RAID0 Win7 Home 64-bit OEM 55" LED 120hz 1080p Vizio MS Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 
PowerCase
750W PC P&C Silencer CoolerMaster 690 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i5 2500S AMD 6770M 8GB (2x4GB) at 1333Mhz 1TB, 7200 rpm 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
LG 8X Dual-Layer "SuperDrive" OS X Lion 27" iMac screen Mac wireless keyboard 
Mouse
Mac wireless mouse 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7-2600K AMD 6970M 1GB 16GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1TB 7200rpm 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256GB SSD 8x DL "SuperDrive" OS X 10.7 Lion 27" 2560x1440 iMac display 
Monitor
27" Apple thunderbolt display 
  hide details  
Reply
Foldatron
(17 items)
 
Mat
(10 items)
 
Work iMac
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 950 EVGA x58 3-way SLI EVGA GTX 660ti GTX 275 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 80GB Intel X25-M SSD 2TB WD Black 150GB WD Raptor 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x 150GB WD V-raptor in RAID0 Win7 Home 64-bit OEM 55" LED 120hz 1080p Vizio MS Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 
PowerCase
750W PC P&C Silencer CoolerMaster 690 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i5 2500S AMD 6770M 8GB (2x4GB) at 1333Mhz 1TB, 7200 rpm 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
LG 8X Dual-Layer "SuperDrive" OS X Lion 27" iMac screen Mac wireless keyboard 
Mouse
Mac wireless mouse 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7-2600K AMD 6970M 1GB 16GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1TB 7200rpm 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256GB SSD 8x DL "SuperDrive" OS X 10.7 Lion 27" 2560x1440 iMac display 
Monitor
27" Apple thunderbolt display 
  hide details  
Reply
post #30 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkknight512 View Post
No, it's because the 5870 is slightly faster then the 6870, the 6870 runs with much less power though.
Check again, Clearly it shows the 5870 outpreforming the 6970. Only reason I can say is Beta.
5820k
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 5820k ASUS x99 Sabertooth Zotac 980Ti AMP! 2 x G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 series 16GB DDR4 2400 
Hard DriveCoolingOSOS
Samsun SM951 Corsair H100i CentOS Windows 10 Pro KVM 
CaseMouseAudio
CM Storm Stryker Corsair SABRE Sound Blaster Z 
  hide details  
Reply
5820k
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 5820k ASUS x99 Sabertooth Zotac 980Ti AMP! 2 x G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 series 16GB DDR4 2400 
Hard DriveCoolingOSOS
Samsun SM951 Corsair H100i CentOS Windows 10 Pro KVM 
CaseMouseAudio
CM Storm Stryker Corsair SABRE Sound Blaster Z 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Software News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › [HWC] F@H Core 16 on AMD GPUs