Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › i am still impressed with the 560ti performance: Modern Warfare 2 Benchmark
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

i am still impressed with the 560ti performance: Modern Warfare 2 Benchmark

post #1 of 42
Thread Starter 
i was looking to see what kind of fps' my card should be putting down. now of course, all the cards listed are older cards, since this game has been out for a little while now. but the 560 fared damn well. topped the charts too(not sure if thats a "duh its supposed to" moment, but i was happy).




i benched the same scene with fraps, and i got a minimum of 70fps, and an average of 126.7, all max settings @ 1920x1080.

considering the hd5870 topped the charts with 89fps, the 560ti kills it!
Edited by stRodda - 4/14/11 at 3:54pm
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k - 4.8ghz @1.35v p67a-g45 MSI gtx560ti 2x2 patriot viper 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
3 WD's - 1.7TB Total Win7 Ultimate ViewSonic 2702@1920x1080 & Mitsu 65" @1920x1080 BFG ls550 
Case
800D Obsidian 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k - 4.8ghz @1.35v p67a-g45 MSI gtx560ti 2x2 patriot viper 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
3 WD's - 1.7TB Total Win7 Ultimate ViewSonic 2702@1920x1080 & Mitsu 65" @1920x1080 BFG ls550 
Case
800D Obsidian 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 42
Apparently going balls deep isn't allowed or something...
Albino Sasquatch
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-760 @ 4.1ghz MSI H55-GD65 LGA 1156 MSI GTX580 @ 850/2000 1.1v 4GB DDR3 Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Kingston 64GB SSD/ 1 TB WD Win7 Ultimate x64 HannsG 28" LCD - 1200p Logitech G15 
PowerCaseMouse
TT Black Widow 850w White NZXT Phantom (modded) Cyborg R.A.T. 7 
  hide details  
Reply
Albino Sasquatch
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-760 @ 4.1ghz MSI H55-GD65 LGA 1156 MSI GTX580 @ 850/2000 1.1v 4GB DDR3 Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Kingston 64GB SSD/ 1 TB WD Win7 Ultimate x64 HannsG 28" LCD - 1200p Logitech G15 
PowerCaseMouse
TT Black Widow 850w White NZXT Phantom (modded) Cyborg R.A.T. 7 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 42
Do you have any actual proof of your scores?

Not saying it's not possible, just adds some credibility.
post #4 of 42
Thread Starter 

not sure what else i could show, so here.

captured with my iphone.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k - 4.8ghz @1.35v p67a-g45 MSI gtx560ti 2x2 patriot viper 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
3 WD's - 1.7TB Total Win7 Ultimate ViewSonic 2702@1920x1080 & Mitsu 65" @1920x1080 BFG ls550 
Case
800D Obsidian 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k - 4.8ghz @1.35v p67a-g45 MSI gtx560ti 2x2 patriot viper 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
3 WD's - 1.7TB Total Win7 Ultimate ViewSonic 2702@1920x1080 & Mitsu 65" @1920x1080 BFG ls550 
Case
800D Obsidian 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 42
Remember that it's using a modified Quake 3 engine, which is years old. Besides the latest Call of Duty (Black Ops) of the PC, which was an unoptimized port, most of them ran fairly well on anything "modern" (which is classify as a GeForce 8800 equivalent or newer).

Yeah, the GPU is definitely nice though. I was surprised how well it did in Crysis for me after seeing new GPU after new GPU getting nowhere fast with that game. It still doesn't perform perfectly in it, but almost, and it is Crysis, so it handles most games perfectly.
post #6 of 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Garnet View Post
Yeah, the GPU is definitely nice though. I was surprised how well it did in Crysis for me after seeing new GPU after new GPU getting nowhere fast with that game. It still doesn't perform perfectly in it, but almost, and it is Crysis, so it handles most games perfectly.
SLI it and even Crysis won't slow you down.
post #7 of 42
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booty Warrior View Post
SLI it and even Crysis won't slow you down.
if you have either game, modern warfare2 or crysis, have you ever run a bench on them?


im curious to see how much higher your fps is. i just ordered a 2500k, so you have what i will have, but better.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k - 4.8ghz @1.35v p67a-g45 MSI gtx560ti 2x2 patriot viper 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
3 WD's - 1.7TB Total Win7 Ultimate ViewSonic 2702@1920x1080 & Mitsu 65" @1920x1080 BFG ls550 
Case
800D Obsidian 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k - 4.8ghz @1.35v p67a-g45 MSI gtx560ti 2x2 patriot viper 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
3 WD's - 1.7TB Total Win7 Ultimate ViewSonic 2702@1920x1080 & Mitsu 65" @1920x1080 BFG ls550 
Case
800D Obsidian 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 42
I don't have Modern Warfare 2.

In Crysis, my GPU is almost always in the high 90% range, so the CPU isn't holding back in that game. Since we have similar video cards, you'd get similar results to me rather than him (since he has SLi). I do run at 1600x1200 though so you might not get the exact same as me.

This game isn't CPU bound though, so you won't see anything moving to a Core i5 2500K in this game. The post above yours was right. If you want more in this game, you have to give it more in the GPU department.
post #9 of 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by stRodda View Post
if you have either game, modern warfare2 or crysis, have you ever run a bench on them?


im curious to see how much higher your fps is. i just ordered a 2500k, so you have what i will have, but better.
I don't have any CoD games so I can't help there, but I did run a quick 3 loop Crysis bench @1080p, Very High w/ 16xQ AA.



My cards are only clocked at 900 core btw.
post #10 of 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booty Warrior View Post
SLI it and even Crysis won't slow you down.
Put a 2 after crysis haha.
X79-GCN
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3930K 4.5GHz HT GIGABYTE GA-X79-UP4 AMD R9-290X GEil Evo Potenza DDR3 2400MHz CL10 (4x4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung 840 Pro 120GB EK Supremacy (CPU) NF F12's P/P (360 Rad)  NF A14's (420 Rad)  
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
XSPC Chrome Compression Fittings EK RES X3 150 Primochill PremoFlex Advanced LRT Clear 1/2 ID EK-FC (R9 290X) 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
EK D5 Vario Top-X  Phobya G-Changer V2 360mm Phobya G-Changer V2 420mm Win 10 x64 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ XR3501 35" Curved Corsair Vengeance K90 Seasonic X-1250 Gold (v2) Corsair 900D 
MouseAudio
Logitech G400s Senn HD 598 
  hide details  
Reply
X79-GCN
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3930K 4.5GHz HT GIGABYTE GA-X79-UP4 AMD R9-290X GEil Evo Potenza DDR3 2400MHz CL10 (4x4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung 840 Pro 120GB EK Supremacy (CPU) NF F12's P/P (360 Rad)  NF A14's (420 Rad)  
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
XSPC Chrome Compression Fittings EK RES X3 150 Primochill PremoFlex Advanced LRT Clear 1/2 ID EK-FC (R9 290X) 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
EK D5 Vario Top-X  Phobya G-Changer V2 360mm Phobya G-Changer V2 420mm Win 10 x64 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ XR3501 35" Curved Corsair Vengeance K90 Seasonic X-1250 Gold (v2) Corsair 900D 
MouseAudio
Logitech G400s Senn HD 598 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: NVIDIA
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › i am still impressed with the 560ti performance: Modern Warfare 2 Benchmark