Originally Posted by Al plants Corn
You won't notice it. Ever.
I've played all kinda of games on my monitor and have not once noticed any input lag. Here's a protip when viewing this section: completely disregard anyone who even mentions input lag and ignore they're post
My single biggest regret(well, my ONLY regret) when I bought this u2711 is that I didn't go for the u3011.
I just finished looking up my screen and its 6ms GTG (same as the u2711). I don't notice the delay.
I wont spend more money to go 16:10, I prefer more horizontal for gaming.
Looking at more reviews on the GTX590, GT580 and HD6990 still...
Seems like all of them would stick 60 fps at 2560x1440. And the 590 and 6990 would hit about 80 to 100 fps @ 1920x1080.
So the question really comes back to deciding if higher fps or cleaner lines is better for me. The u2711 is about a 50% DPI increase, which is huge, and might even look nice with no AA or 2xAA. I think it's obvious that I am not a competitive fps gamer and the higher DPI option is probably better.
If I stick with nVidia I can use my GTX295 for physx (even if I can only utilize a single core) if I don't end up selling it.
So the final question is 580 or 590? Both would do the trick for anything I play now, the 590 could last me a little longer.