Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › AMD 32 Cores Bulldozer (8 cores x 4) @ 1.8ghz Cinebench results (PCINLIFE forums)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AMD 32 Cores Bulldozer (8 cores x 4) @ 1.8ghz Cinebench results (PCINLIFE forums) - Page 15

post #141 of 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by konspiracy View Post
Doubt it.
If amd performance per core is better than intel then gaming performance will be better than intel.
And when games use more cores BD will become even more favorable.
I'm going to retire from this thread, there is too much unknown to really make any real conclusions.

BD is about a month away, we'll see what happens then.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K P8P67 PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 
GraphicsRAMRAMRAM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT G-Skill A-Data G-Skill 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
A-Data Crucial M4 64GB + 1TB F3 Spinpoint $155 LS/DL DVD RW $?? Windows 8 64-bit "Epic Registry" Edition 
MonitorPowerCase
ASUS 21.5 1920x1080 2ms $135 CORSAIR HX850 $120 Mother Earth $free 
  hide details  
Reply
post #142 of 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by BallaTheFeared View Post
Its not the same as HT, its similar.

The point is thread count does not matter in a program such as Cinebench.

You can't compare a 4 core 8 thread i7-2600k to a 8 core bulldozer cpu it call it 8 cores vs 8 cores because it's simply not.

Its moot anyways to most of us. I'm more interested in how the 4 core bulldozer chip fares against the i5-2500k.
JF-AMD has already confirmed there is no form of HT.
QQ??
The 2600K has more cores than a 8 core BD,HT is the equivalent of a core.
Moar cores!
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8320 @ 4.0Ghz/4.2Ghz turbo gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 rev. 4.0 Gigabyte Nvida GTX 770OC 2GB/ Gigabyte 970 G1 G... Gskill Sniper 1866Mhz 8GB (4GB x 2) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB WD Black 1TB Asus 24X CM Hyper 212Evo 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Home X64 HP 22BW 21.5" LED-IPS CM Storm Trigger/MX Brown Corsair TX 650V2 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
CM HAF922 Logitech G500S Steelseries QCK Mini Asus Xonar DX 7.1 
  hide details  
Reply
Moar cores!
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8320 @ 4.0Ghz/4.2Ghz turbo gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 rev. 4.0 Gigabyte Nvida GTX 770OC 2GB/ Gigabyte 970 G1 G... Gskill Sniper 1866Mhz 8GB (4GB x 2) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB WD Black 1TB Asus 24X CM Hyper 212Evo 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Home X64 HP 22BW 21.5" LED-IPS CM Storm Trigger/MX Brown Corsair TX 650V2 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
CM HAF922 Logitech G500S Steelseries QCK Mini Asus Xonar DX 7.1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #143 of 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by born2bwild View Post
A. I'm minoring in economy, so point down.
B. I never claimed it will be priced at 1k. But definitely not at AMD PII 1100T prices which many AMD fans would expect it to. If I had to guess, if and only IF the performance is as high as I estimated it to be - which it might NOT due to many reasons - it will be priced at ~$500-600.

Also, did I say something that offended you? You seem to be taking this much more personally than you should.
As I read your post, it seemed to me like you were saying prices will be the same as 990x. It was just the formulation used really.

I'm not offended and I'm not taking it personally.
AiryBox
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3770k Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Sapphire 7950 Vapor-X Corsair Vengeance 8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Hitachi Desktar 7200RPM 1TB Samsung 830 128GB Corsair H100i W10 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ 24" Qpad Mk-50 Cherry MX Red CM V700 NZXT H440 
  hide details  
Reply
AiryBox
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3770k Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Sapphire 7950 Vapor-X Corsair Vengeance 8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Hitachi Desktar 7200RPM 1TB Samsung 830 128GB Corsair H100i W10 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ 24" Qpad Mk-50 Cherry MX Red CM V700 NZXT H440 
  hide details  
Reply
post #144 of 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by BallaTheFeared View Post
I'm going to retire from this thread, there is too much unknown to really make any real conclusions.

BD is about a month away, we'll see what happens then.
Then why did you start trolling in the first place.
You should just retire from all amd threads period.
You have been trolling for the last couple of weeks.
post #145 of 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by konspiracy View Post
Doubt it.
If amd performance per core is better than intel then gaming performance will be better than intel.
And when games use more cores BD will become even more favorable.
Or by then intel wil have UBERthreading and we'll be right back where we are now, waiting for AMD to catch up. That is just speculating way too far in advance for my tastes.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600k 4.5GHz @ 1.32V Asus P8P67 Pro EVGA GTX 580 Mushkin 2133 9-10-9-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 840  WD Black Silver Arrow Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2211H Rosewill RK-9000BR Seasonic X750 HAF X 
MouseAudio
Razer Lachesis Grado HF2 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600k 4.5GHz @ 1.32V Asus P8P67 Pro EVGA GTX 580 Mushkin 2133 9-10-9-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 840  WD Black Silver Arrow Windows 7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2211H Rosewill RK-9000BR Seasonic X750 HAF X 
MouseAudio
Razer Lachesis Grado HF2 
  hide details  
Reply
post #146 of 293
Everyone is forgetting that there is 3 CPUS in this thing. Benchmark was so high because it is 32cores.
post #147 of 293
I think we should all just accept that:

-Most if not all benchmarks of Bulldozer are fake

-There is no hard evidence of anything besides 8 cores, 32nm, and 4+GHz turbo

-We have no idea how it will be priced

-What if it was hyper threaded?

My thoughts:
-It will probably be like every other PC component. Super hyped up then a big disappointment. My guess is it will have 150% the performance of the 1090t.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3770k Gigabyte Z77-UD5H-WB Golden GTX 670 Windforce 3X 2 x 4GB GSkill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 4 64GB- WD Caviar Black 1TB Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Dell U2311H IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
xArmor iOne U9BL MX Blues Seasonic x750 LIAN LI PC-T60B Logitech G500 
Audio
Modded JVC HA-RX900 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3770k Gigabyte Z77-UD5H-WB Golden GTX 670 Windforce 3X 2 x 4GB GSkill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 4 64GB- WD Caviar Black 1TB Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Dell U2311H IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
xArmor iOne U9BL MX Blues Seasonic x750 LIAN LI PC-T60B Logitech G500 
Audio
Modded JVC HA-RX900 
  hide details  
Reply
post #148 of 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by konspiracy View Post
Then why did you start trolling in the first place.
You should just retire from all amd threads period.
You have been trolling for the last couple of weeks.
^This.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DayoftheGreek View Post
Or by then intel wil have UBERthreading and we'll be right back where we are now, waiting for AMD to catch up. That is just speculating way too far in advance for my tastes.
LOL,uberthreading. Intel's Hyperthreading is crap,it only boosts scores in benchmarks. In real world use it can actually hurt performance.
Moar cores!
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8320 @ 4.0Ghz/4.2Ghz turbo gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 rev. 4.0 Gigabyte Nvida GTX 770OC 2GB/ Gigabyte 970 G1 G... Gskill Sniper 1866Mhz 8GB (4GB x 2) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB WD Black 1TB Asus 24X CM Hyper 212Evo 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Home X64 HP 22BW 21.5" LED-IPS CM Storm Trigger/MX Brown Corsair TX 650V2 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
CM HAF922 Logitech G500S Steelseries QCK Mini Asus Xonar DX 7.1 
  hide details  
Reply
Moar cores!
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8320 @ 4.0Ghz/4.2Ghz turbo gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 rev. 4.0 Gigabyte Nvida GTX 770OC 2GB/ Gigabyte 970 G1 G... Gskill Sniper 1866Mhz 8GB (4GB x 2) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB WD Black 1TB Asus 24X CM Hyper 212Evo 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Home X64 HP 22BW 21.5" LED-IPS CM Storm Trigger/MX Brown Corsair TX 650V2 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
CM HAF922 Logitech G500S Steelseries QCK Mini Asus Xonar DX 7.1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #149 of 293
Most of the Intel replies comes from fanboys who wants to justify their Sandy Bridge purchase, so that they can feel good about themselves not waiting for BD.


Quote:
Originally Posted by snelan View Post
My thoughts:
-It will probably be like every other PC component. Super hyped up then a big disappointment. My guess is it will have 150% the performance of the 1090t.
Plenty of computer components that were hyped to the max and didn't dissapoint. Stop trolling if this is the best you can do.
Edited by Stefy - 4/25/11 at 5:22pm
AiryBox
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3770k Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Sapphire 7950 Vapor-X Corsair Vengeance 8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Hitachi Desktar 7200RPM 1TB Samsung 830 128GB Corsair H100i W10 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ 24" Qpad Mk-50 Cherry MX Red CM V700 NZXT H440 
  hide details  
Reply
AiryBox
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3770k Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Sapphire 7950 Vapor-X Corsair Vengeance 8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Hitachi Desktar 7200RPM 1TB Samsung 830 128GB Corsair H100i W10 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ 24" Qpad Mk-50 Cherry MX Red CM V700 NZXT H440 
  hide details  
Reply
post #150 of 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy MG View Post
^This.


LOL,uberthreading. Intel's Hyperthreading is crap,it only boosts score in benchmarks. In real world use it can actually hurt performance.
But who cares about real world things when all we talk about on OCN is benchmarks?

/sarcasm

Stefi: If I wanted Bulldozer I could just sell my 2600k, that was the plan all along, I can't live with only two 8x 8x PCI lanes.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3770k Gigabyte Z77-UD5H-WB Golden GTX 670 Windforce 3X 2 x 4GB GSkill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 4 64GB- WD Caviar Black 1TB Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Dell U2311H IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
xArmor iOne U9BL MX Blues Seasonic x750 LIAN LI PC-T60B Logitech G500 
Audio
Modded JVC HA-RX900 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3770k Gigabyte Z77-UD5H-WB Golden GTX 670 Windforce 3X 2 x 4GB GSkill RipJawsX 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 4 64GB- WD Caviar Black 1TB Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Dell U2311H IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
xArmor iOne U9BL MX Blues Seasonic x750 LIAN LI PC-T60B Logitech G500 
Audio
Modded JVC HA-RX900 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
  • AMD 32 Cores Bulldozer (8 cores x 4) @ 1.8ghz Cinebench results (PCINLIFE forums)
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › AMD 32 Cores Bulldozer (8 cores x 4) @ 1.8ghz Cinebench results (PCINLIFE forums)