Overclock.net banner

[DS] Ubisoft Prices Its Uplay Passport At $9.99.

3.3K views 52 replies 42 participants last post by  Viridian  
#1 ·
206266-u1.jpg


http://www.destructoid.com/ubisoft-prices-its-uplay-passport-at-9-99-206266.phtml
Quote:
....We have official confirmation and a solid price point to work with. As is becoming the norm, new copies of games will include one-time codes that unlock multiplayer and potentially further bonus content as well.

If you buy an applicable title used and want access to this locked-out content, it's going to cost you $9.99. Ubisoft is launching this initiative "in the coming months," starting with Driver: San Francisco. Expect to see it applied to the company's "popular core games."
Oh no....
frown.gif
 
#3 ·
Ubisoft's kidding themselves if they think I'm going to pay for a service like this, let alone buy their games in the first place. The only games of theirs I buy are the Assassin's Creed titles. They lost me as a customer when they released Far Cry 2, which was buggy as heck and absolutely terrible anyway, and then followed that up by releasing DRM that required an internet connection for single player games.

/rant
 
#5 ·
Well, that is better than the alternative of not being able to unlock it. I still don't see the big deal. As long as one key is used by one person at any moment in time.

They are just making a game sitting on shelf unplayed being sold to some one who might actually want to play it equal to a lost sale on the game. If the person could not have bought the game used at a cheap price they probably wouldn't of purchased it at all. However, I do think that places like GameStop make entirely too much money off of used game sales. They should be charging much less for them or else giving people more of a trade in on games. This will have an effect on that at least. Used games will have to be sold for at least $10 less now.

I also remember back when I was a bit of console gamer (PS1 days) I would trade games with friends for a week or two. That is probably going bash that in unless they trade physical consoles as well.
 
#10 ·
Ubisoft get worse all the time.

-Starforce DRM
-Buying out good intellectual properties and trashing them
-Always-online DRM for single player games
-Proving the severe downsides of the above DRM when their servers went down for an extended period
-Won't give out review samples to magazines\sites that gave negative reviews of their products

Now they treat second owners as though they never purchased the game.
 
#11 ·
When Ubicrap forced a constant online connection and only saving your save game on their server is when I gave them the old middle finger.
 
#12 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phenom_955;14257376
-Won't give out review samples to magazines\sites that gave negative reviews of their products
What? When?
 
#13 ·
Quote:
-Won't give out review samples to magazines\sites that gave negative reviews of their products
Isn't that pretty much all of them?

Though the DRM is nuts though in the Ubisoft court. The next thing is going to be sending in a DNA sample to activate your game and another sample if you ever need to re-install it.
 
#14 ·
All of y'all complaining about always on DRM, its not true anymore. At least for AC: BH you don't have to always be online
 
#15 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by beers;14257325
Sounds like it's promoting piracy to me.
Why buy the game when you can simply acquire a copy, and purchase a legitimate key for $10, instead of $50-60?
Probably because you'll have to input the original key prior to purchasing a new key? I highly doubt they'd let something like that get through their control process... though stranger things have happened.
 
#17 ·
I've already been boycotting Ubi for over a year. I do get their games for consoles used, but I don't care about online.

Hopefully, this will encourage more to cease giving money to this lousy publisher.
 
#18 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by XNine;14257693
Probably because you'll have to input the original key prior to purchasing a new key? I highly doubt they'd let something like that get through their control process... though stranger things have happened.
Like the time their store page was messed up and everything was free. I barely missed out on a few games, saw it while on my moms laptop ran to my desktop, by the time it booted on they had taken down their website for maintance.
frown.gif
 
#20 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrilmak;14257594
When Ubicrap forced a constant online connection and only saving your save game on their server is when I gave them the old middle finger.
Pretty much the same here, i got teh newest PoP for christmas last year and i bought AC II for $20 a month or so ago, and i jsut downloaded a cracked EXE for both...lol to test it i unplugged me Ethernet Cord and played a whole level/misson, no issues. even though i buy all of my games, i always get a No-DVD or No-CD crack, even for steam games i most of the time use a cracked EXE despite buying them, i even gained about 5 frames in metro and mafia ii with a cracked exe to exclude steam.
 
#22 ·
Oh darn, a developer wants to make us pay a somewhat small fee to play a game that we buy used [i.e. helps neither the publisher or the developer] online. let's all get out our pitchforks and gasoline.

Just in case you guys haven't noticed: Used games hurt the industry. I think this is a somewhat bad way to go about combating used sales, but stop acting like it's not justifiable.

I personally think that developers should try to give incentive for new purchases without having to charge us for locked content, but is this really that bad?

in my opinion, no not really. The used copy would probably end up costing around the same as a new one, or maybe a few dollars less.
 
#24 ·
#25 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by xPrestonn;14258398
Oh darn, a developer wants to make us pay a somewhat small fee to play a game that we buy used [i.e. helps neither the publisher or the developer] online. let's all get out our pitchforks and gasoline.

Just in case you guys haven't noticed: Used games hurt the industry. I think this is a somewhat bad way to go about combating used sales, but stop acting like it's not justifiable.

I personally think that developers should try to give incentive for new purchases without having to charge us for locked content, but is this really that bad?

in my opinion, no not really. The used copy would probably end up costing around the same as a new one, or maybe a few dollars less.
So, when you go buy a used DVD you would be ok with paying a fee on top of what you paid for the DVD to watch the movie? What about a used CD? Pay to listen to that CD you just bought? How about some used golf clubs? Should you pay the manufacturer of those clubs if you bought them used so you can use them?

You're mentality is that of the RIAA, MPAA, and other hardnosed organizations that only seek to make more money than is reasonable.

The industry doesn't hurt because of used game sales. They already made a large amount during the initial sale of the game. This is called greed.
 
#26 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vagrant Storm;14257282
I also remember back when I was a bit of console gamer (PS1 days) I would trade games with friends for a week or two. That is probably going bash that in unless they trade physical consoles as well.
Nope just trade hard drives/memory cards with the profile.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegreatsquare;14257855
I've already been boycotting Ubi for over a year. I do get their games for consoles used, but I don't care about online.

Hopefully, this will encourage more to cease giving money to this lousy publisher.
I just got Assisans Creed 2 for my PC at the last big steam sale. I do think that this is another cheap way to get more money. Times are tough, but that doesn't mean that it gives publishers the right to try to steal away money from their customers.

This will also take away a good amount of money from game stores like EBgames. I wonder how they will react.