|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Video Game News | |
3D Graphics Performance in Team Fortress 2
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||
|
szayaytyaytyt
|
October 15, 2007
Jason Cross ![]() ![]() ![]() Quote:
__________________
Vista.x64.FAQ ‡ MP3 Server ‡ Boost.IE.in.Vista ‡ Shortcut.Overlay.Remover ‡ HR.Wallpaper.Websites linskingdom's Official VMark BETA Testing Thread OCN's Finest Blogger: Technical Joe-PinionsLet your computer help find cures Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
The 2900XT realy shows what it can do in this game.
__________________
Core 2 Duo E6420 @ 3.2GHz ![]() http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=262357 3D Mark 06 score 11422 ![]() http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=12071981
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
I vant blood...
|
Till you start crankin the eye candy.....
![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
szayaytyaytyt
|
Talking about eye candy.. Can you get a better avvy?
![]()
__________________
Vista.x64.FAQ ‡ MP3 Server ‡ Boost.IE.in.Vista ‡ Shortcut.Overlay.Remover ‡ HR.Wallpaper.Websites linskingdom's Official VMark BETA Testing Thread OCN's Finest Blogger: Technical Joe-PinionsLet your computer help find cures Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
I vant blood...
|
............... ............. .. ..(changes avvy)......
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
*cough* Stock *cough*
|
Omg.Why they don't test 1gb and 512 mb version
__________________ .
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
prolly coz source engine is that optimised and efficient it doesnt need all that Vram.
im not surprised the Hd2900 kicks arse at that res, like it was always supposed to. one thing that i am glad about (coz i own 2 GTX) but also surprised was that eye candy (AA,AF) on, the HD2900 loses a lot of performance over the GTX. wasnt the HD2900 meant to have all the raw processing power to pump out the frames at high res/max eye candy? i thought that was ATI's intention. or is it DX10 that its meant to really shine. either way nice results for both teams.
__________________
Wait, we can't stop here. This is bat country... (-*-) BOOM!!! HEADSHOT Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
yea but who will play on that res?
![]()
__________________
![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Programmer
|
AFAIK, Team Fortress 2 runs on the source engine, and source doesn't have DX10 support. So all these cards are running at DX9 specs...
So these DX10 cards are not being fully utilized spec wise (?) Who knows, maybe the 2900XT does better than the GTX at DX10 stuff??? Hard telling with this bench...
__________________
My Lego case thread. With PICS!!! ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Video card RMA database thread. I am working on an application that allows users to input their cards issues into a database, to build a knowledge base for what types of cards have a lower fail rate.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
I vant blood...
|
I can think of a handful of people on here that would.....
![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|