OmegaNemesis28

Source

Overall - I find that greedy and wrong unless that is the PC, PS3, and Wii are getting their own separate DLC too. I can see one console getting exclusive DLC if its just a 360 and PS3 (or Wii) version, but not when its across - what - 6 platforms?

__________________

xShishy

Yeah... I own all 3 (pc, ps3, 360) and well, my 360 got the rrod twice, gave up on it.
Ps3 is fine, but I play PC most now lol.

__________________

thegreatsquare

"Eidos was far vaguer on the description for Lara's Shadow, saying only that the chapter "will introduce players to a new kind of playable character and create a unique Tomb Raider experience.""

That worries me. Nothing easier that screwing up TR by introducing new elements that for some reason one needs to be secretive about.

csm11

Microsoft is, in my opinion, putting too much effort into securing exclusive downloadable content. I'd feel the same way if Sony were doing it too, so it doesn't really matter which company we're talking about, just generally speaking. For example, gamers have moved on from the 360 GTAIV to the PC version and are left with still no DLC. Yeah yeah, it's coming sometime, but will it even matter when it comes out? Will Microsoft get their return on investment in this situation? And is Tomb Raider really relevant anymore? Has anyone on here played the last 2-3 iterations of Tomb Raider? Were they any good?

I like this topic and what do others feel about DLC in general? I may be missing the point here.

__________________

Team Overclock Foldowzers

woop - Mazeppa - OhMyGodPower - csm11

Guruboy

OK does anyone agree with me that throwing money around for DLC is just plain wrong? It's like they'd rather change a game experience for bragging rights than stay true to the game and the developer's vision. Obviously it's the suits who are taking this money from Microsoft and telling the developers to "please develop this part of the game for the Xbox 360 only". I say either pay off the company for an exclusive release or don't do anything at all. This ruins the game.

I played Legends and Anniversary and both were great. I really can't wait for Underworld.

__________________
I love Vista, but the horrors of Office 2007 will never plague my hard drive sectors while I am system administrator.

csm11

Ah ok. I guess I'm just ignorant when it comes to Tomb Raider. The last one I played was on PS1 or something.

__________________

Team Overclock Foldowzers

woop - Mazeppa - OhMyGodPower - csm11

gtarmanrob

whole-heartedly.

i dont mind DLC really, but as Omega said, as long as each platform gets something, especially with a game that branches across MULTIPLE platforms. its just Microsoft being the big bully again really.

i know Sony would have enough money to do the same thing, but they obviously dont want to as to me it seems they try harder to secure an exclusive release, not content.

im also out of touch with Tomb Raider, the last i played was the re-make of the original, Anniversary i think. which was actually pretty good, brought back good memories of the PS1 days.

ill probably give this one a go though, will be getting it for console.

__________________
Wait, we can't stop here. This is bat country...

Porthios

Seriously, why would anyone care about DLC for Tomb Raider? You're just bumping off good news.

gtarmanrob

?? why wouldnt you care if you liked the game. its extra content that adds up to 6 hours of gameplay.

i think its stupid that Microsoft paid off the dev of Tomb Raider so that only Xbox gets it..especially when the game is being released on so many different platforms.

__________________
Wait, we can't stop here. This is bat country...

OmegaNemesis28

maybe I want Tomb Raider for the PC huh? If you do not like my news because it bumps off other news, then why bump it more? Common sense.

__________________