Originally Posted by chronostorm

just because you didn't like a game, didn't mean lots of other people didn't. Game ratings aren't meant to be taken on a literal scale, where a perfect score leads to a perfect game, but rather should be used as a measure of how enjoyable the game was for the reviewer.

Either way, back on topic: Famitsu didn't give out too many perfect scores until recently, it seems, until 2008, when they gave out three 40s in a year, and now 3 in 2009 as well.

They're either getting more lenient or games are getting more awesome. I guess many of us will get to see soon enough if this game is deserving of the rating Famitsu gave it.

Originally Posted by 0m3g4

exactly nothing can ever get a perfect score because scoring is relative to the player, also getting 99.99% or 100% game should be totally without flaw.

Originally Posted by Shane1244

Maybe I can come over to your house and we can play some SuperPi? Then later on we can set up a LAN and play 3D Mark Vantage?

Originally Posted by 0m3g4

voice acting was good, story was decent.
gameplay was crap imo, 8.5/10 at best

Originally Posted by Twinnuke

Lets see here...
Gunplay - Works great
Cover System - Works amazing for how many things have to be considered in a sandbox game of GTAs magnitude
Driving - Not as fun as the old games but surely works without a hitch most of the time
Flight - Lack of planes is a downer but the helicopter controls a greatly improved over past itterations and the way the rotor and tails break off is amazing.
Can Swim

Those are all gameplay aspects and they work flawlessly together. Now it may not be as fun as Saints Row 2 but everything works much better than in SR2.

Originally Posted by Shane1244

Maybe I can come over to your house and we can play some SuperPi? Then later on we can set up a LAN and play 3D Mark Vantage?

Originally Posted by gex80

isn't this the game that is like the female version of devil may cry? I don't feel like clicking link since I am lazy.