Murlocke

60 FPS is the sweet spot for me. I leave vsync on.

__________________

Volcom13

What is the correct answer then?

__________________

Q9650 Club

We Are The Red Tide

$$$Money Saved for next Upgrade!$$$

T3h_Ch33z_Muncha

The human eye does not see in frames per second, and can certainly notice far higher than 60 FPS.

__________________
Please don't call me Muncha, as cheese is not the only insinuatable munchable object; Ch33z will suffice. Oh, and i almost forgot to express my love for Heru
Planned upgrades (kind of in order): 22" Monitor, Goliathus Omega (mousepad), new chair, Windows 7, CM 690, new desk, Ideazon ZBoard MERC, Sennheiser HD201, bong, DX 11 card(s)+necessary PSU
Epic things happening in 2010: Toy Story 3, new H.I.M album, Supreme Commander 2, MechWarrior, The Elder Scrolls V, Mafia II, Star Wars: The Old Republic, Bioshock 2, Crysis 2, Iron Man 2

Ecchi-BANZAII!!!

Again with the stupid FPS questions...

Yet I've only seen one with the TFT+100FPS comment here...

Hz=FPS limit
Vsync=better image quality (I don't see screen tearing as an increased quality setting).

Games that suffer input lag on vsync are badly coded and aren't "good" enough to handle it.

__________________
　　　＿_ 　
　/'´　 　ヽ 　　　　Oh and as for the Man-Erin i was tempted to post that also lol. For some reason i want to call it "Marin"
●ｌｶﾉﾉﾙ ﾋﾟﾉ●　　　　　Marc Rudov FTW　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　ತ_ತ
　从 ﾟ ヮﾟﾉｿ 　　 　　　　 Don't you love when someone
⊂ ［］ 二［］つ　　 　　 　　deletes your post without noticing you.　　　 　
　 /　 V \ 　　　　 　　　 You end up searching for that post in vain and anger...
　/____ \　 　 　　　　　　　I hate Autotunes
　 （/ （/　 　　　　　　　　　　　Smiley of the year:

olli3

I like to have at least 60fps for games, otherwise it doesnt feel smooth on the mouse to me. 30fps really annoys me. and i see no point in locking it. there seems to be alot of solid facts around about fps and refresh rate etc but i dont think its an exact science, its all down to an individuals preferance and even skill levels in a game etc.

__________________
mozilla Firefox club
you just lost the game
flickr

TestECull

I never have V-sync on. I don't have tearing, so I don't need it on.

__________________

FSF-Foxhound

30FPS is crap

__________________
LGA1156 club!

LGA-1156 i7/i5 Overclocking Guide!


odear, run to the hills!

jcichetti

qft

__________________

Info: Xpert's Guide to Counter-Strike:Source For All Skill Levels

The Rochester, NY Club | Looking For Local Gamers in Western NY

Miked270

When turning in a FPS 30fps vs 60fps+ is very noticable for me. Not so much walking forward but when I turn left to right with high sensetivity it's very noticable in terms smoothness and clarity.

30fps vs 60fps is also very noticable on racing games. It feels so much more fluid and natural visually.

It seems that anything related to speed looks much better w/60fps+

Coma

You get adjusted to a FPS - without consciously looking for it, you wouldn't notice unless the FPS occasionally jumped to 60 then back to 30 or something. Once you know what some framerates look like, you can tell the FPS even if it isn't changing all the time... but 30 FPS shouldn't bother anyone, not even those who know what 30 FPS look like. It shouldn't seem choppy to you as long as there aren't any high FPS segments thrown in.

There's no hard limit, and no soft limit has been found. In a way, our eyes are more limited by 'response time' than something like a hard FPS limit, in that the faster the motion is, the more blurred it will be. A hawk's eyes, for example, have a higher threshold for when things become too blurry to be able to make out detail. It's a bit like how motion on any LCD screen (even those with fast response times) causes blurring.

Pilots have been shown to be able to identify an airplane that showed for only 1/240th of a second. That is, they were watching a 240 FPS video, and only one frame showed the plane.

__________________
When asking for help: state the goal, not the step.