|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Cooling > Water Cooling | |
Stinger V8 Flow Rate Test Results
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Testing addict
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 2,551
Rep: 580
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 281
Trader Rating: 0
|
I was tempted to run this test again because of the odd curve that developed, but the more I think about it...a nozzle block is a fairly complex restriction. The stinger has a fairly flat/sharp and restrictive nozzle on the inlet, then the interior channel and outlets happen to be very free flowing.
Oh and a special thanks goes to Dryadsoul for the heck of a deal he gave me on this block, very much appreciated! Here is the block tested, I must say it's very nice to hold such a shiny mass of metal, even the barbs are custom made. This particular block has the brass top and copper bottom. ![]() And here is my uncorrected and corrected curve data results. First the uncorrected curve which included a dual inlet reservoir, about 44" of tubing, and the test manometers all of which I have previously tested and curve data to correct for. So what you see below is the uncorrected and corrected curve results. I'm not particularly happy with my data points, typically I don't have quite this much error, so I'll probably run the curve again, but this is what I have. ![]() And this is how it compars to other curves I have in the estimator. It has a strange curve in that it's extremely free flowing at lower flow rates and then picks up restriction rapidly. The fuzion curve is from a prior test of mine and only had data out to 2.2 GPM, so I wouldn't look beyond about 2.5 GPM. It does however reflect a similar shaped curve to the MP05 with a nozzle just with much lower restriction. I'm beginning to think the nozzle just has that sort of effect on pressure drop. ![]() It still beats out a stock Fuzion below about 2.2 GPM which would be most systems, so overall...it's very good! I'm planning to later retest my fuzion with and without a nozzle and make another test on the v8 at the same time (Next time I'll take twice the data points to further ensure accuracy), I'll report back those results when I get them done.
Last edited by Martinm210 : 08-19-07 at 10:56 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||||
|
In Search Of The
![]() |
Great test once again! The results seem logical to me, regarding the pressure jet. The more you try to flow, the more restrictive it gets.
__________________
,, ̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡,,*̡͌l̡*̡̡*̡͌l̡*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ,͡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|̡̡̡ ̡ ̴̡ı̴̡̡ *̡͌l̡*̡̡̡ ̡ ̴̡ı̴̡*̡͌l̡*̡ ̡̡̡ ̡ ̴̡ı̴̡̡,,, ,,
For Sale / Wanted Forum Rules ![]() Online Deals Forum Guidelines ![]()
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
wait hang on, so you want more PSI and more GPM or the reverse?
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Habitual Tinkerer
![]() |
Hey thats not bad at all...I was thinking they would be a little more restrictive then that...Thanks Martin...
__________________
Quote:
![]() **E8600 @ 5751Mhz ***OCN Water Cooling Club And Picture Gallery ***150 Opty @ 3242Mhz **
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Scarring Your Psyche
![]() |
Yay. This is great...first the Bonnie now te Stinger.
Fstfrddy should post this on his website
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Testing addict
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 2,551
Rep: 580
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 281
Trader Rating: 0
|
Quote:
As far as important range to look for, a single block loop with a more typical D5 or DDC pump can approach 2 to 2.2 GPM, and a multi block loop will typically run somewhere around 1.4-1.5 GPM. I would call a typical flow rate somewhere between 1.2 and 2.2 GPM. In that particular range, the V8 is good. The apogee GTX and Fuzion are more restrictive there. I would say from what I can tell, the least restrictive on a typical system would be Stinger V8>Fuzion>Apogee GTX in that order.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Blocksmith
![]() |
Nice Martinm
![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Testing addict
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 2,551
Rep: 580
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 281
Trader Rating: 0
|
Quote:
I am still a bit uneasy with my data error and how it's dipping so low, so next time I'm going to take a bunch more data points. I also didn't correct out the test setup when I ran my fuzion curve, so it's going to be a little better than what you see here, the GTX results however are the published curves and should be fairly representative, swiftech's curves are usually spot on. But regardless, I really do like the feel and mass of the block...has that industrial feel to it.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Testing addict
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 2,551
Rep: 580
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 281
Trader Rating: 0
|
Thanks!
I'll make another test run at the curve, but let me know if you want any particular graphs or comparisons.
Last edited by Martinm210 : 08-19-07 at 11:32 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|