|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
So im seeing alot of people air cool there 3ghz CPUs to 4 gigs on air just as with water.
__________________Would water allow for a stable 5 ghz clock speed? Im curious because A. I want to watercool for performance and a conversation piece B. if the gains are not that much greater I will watercool my GPU's cuss I think it might be more beneficial since they sit so close to each other.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
The Dapper Swindler
![]() |
You won't get to 5GHz stable on water, or probably anything for that matter, unless we're talking about maybe TEC loop and a cherry picked e8600.
The lower temperatures will definitely help your max OC though, and in some cases like with a Core i7, past a certain point air cooling really isn't an option.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
So basically Air and water will get me to 4 ghz, but water will be slightly cooler temps and thus safer to run on a normal basis?
__________________
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Folding Fanatic
![]() |
Basically. But in all honesty, you aren't guaranteed 4GHz with either. You're less likely to reach 4GHz on air though.
__________________
REPORT and move on. Everyone, I have an urgent announcement to make: [PWN]Schubie is tricky.
![]() Usually, 4650<3850<4670<3870<4770<4830<3870X2<4850<5770<487 0<4890<4770 CF<4850X2<4850 CF<5850<5870<5770 CF<4870X2<4870 CF<4890 CF<5850 CF<5970<5870 CF
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
ATI Enthusiast
![]()
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rogers Park, 60626
Posts: 3,469
Rep: 406
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 321
Trader Rating: 0
|
Water cooling is great conversation piece. Why water is better for thermal transfer than a heatsink? Well a little beyond me. Ultimately it is "air cooled" for the active component of the thermal solution. Yea it might squeeze a tiny bit more. But if self contained it still relies on the same equation. And that is the maximum air can dissipate? Smoke and mirrors. A simple equation and the amount you could focus is splitting hairs. 2+2 always equals four.
__________________Anecdotal stories mean nothing to me. Certainly not worth the cost other than as a conversation piece or bragging rights.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Not on topic sorry,, Chopstix do you happen to play a game called 2moons? A character i am good buds with on there has that name lol.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Folding Fanatic
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
REPORT and move on. Everyone, I have an urgent announcement to make: [PWN]Schubie is tricky.
![]() Usually, 4650<3850<4670<3870<4770<4830<3870X2<4850<5770<487 0<4890<4770 CF<4850X2<4850 CF<5850<5870<5770 CF<4870X2<4870 CF<4890 CF<5850 CF<5970<5870 CF
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Quote:
![]() On topic though, would it be a better idea to watercool 2 GPUs or the CPU?
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Folding Fanatic
![]() |
Quote:
If you want to overclock your CPU and your temperatures are high, then that's the way to go. If you want to overclock your GPUs and those temperatures are high, do that. My goal is to make my bajillion fans obsolete and kill some noise while opening up some new grounds in terms of OC room. I also want to get rid of some of the heat that my computer puts off. Therefore I plan on one or two loops containing all of my components. It's cheaper if you only cool your CPU, though.
__________________
REPORT and move on. Everyone, I have an urgent announcement to make: [PWN]Schubie is tricky.
![]() Usually, 4650<3850<4670<3870<4770<4830<3870X2<4850<5770<487 0<4890<4770 CF<4850X2<4850 CF<5850<5870<5770 CF<4870X2<4870 CF<4890 CF<5850 CF<5970<5870 CF
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
Water has a higher heat capacity than air and therefore is a better heat conductor. In simple terms, it will carry more heat away faster. Water (and the heat contained therein) can be much more easily directed away from your precious components, to a radiator where the heat is dissipated (preferably located as far away from your components as possible).
__________________
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|