Quick ??? MCP350 vs MCP355 - Page 2 - Overclock.net

rpm666 · 10-15-09

Can also get the 350 for cheaper and just mod it to 355 speeds. Super easy.

xXLinkageXx · 10-15-09

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Me

I've had both the MCP350 and MCP355, and you won't notice either one over the sound of your hard drive and fans. The MCP355 is slightly noisier, but you won't be able to tell at all once it's in your case. The MCP350 will perform very well in a CPU-only loop. I recommend Martin's excellent Flow Rate Estimator to help you choose which model to purchase. That said, I currently own a MCP355 with an XSPC top. It easily handles my CPU/NB/GPU loop. If you've got plans to add blocks in the future, I would personally recommend the MCP355. Either pump is a solid choice.

yeah that flow generator is pretty cool, it was generally a 20% difference between the two pumps. also even with multiple blocks, it never went below 1.65 gpm. and the loop with a only a cpu in it gets 2.0 gpm so yeah im very happy about this. even with the 20% error martin mentions its still really good performance.

ps anyone know if this XSPC gives a performance boost like this one.

rszanto · 10-15-09

It is the same exact top, just in different form. The pump top is the same as res pump top except you have more acrylic which creates a reservoir. They will all perform roughly the same give or take 1-3% change in pressure etc.

xXLinkageXx · 10-15-09

awesome thank you, im sold

		Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Cooling > Water Cooling
Quick ??? MCP350 vs MCP355

10-15-09	#13 (permalink)
rszanto New to Overclock.net Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 29 Rep: 3 Unique Rep: 3 Trader Rating: 0	It is the same exact top, just in different form. The pump top is the same as res pump top except you have more acrylic which creates a reservoir. They will all perform roughly the same give or take 1-3% change in pressure etc.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)