|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Cooling > Water Cooling | |
Heatkiller 3.0 poorly made?
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
ATI Enthusiast
![]() |
Like many have said, water blocks are better with an indented surface (air pocket is good with water). But, on air it is best to have a flat surface.
__________________
Nostalgic cookies taste old.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
I don't buy into all the small temp change claims by people lapping to a mirror finish. The same small temp differences can be attributed to better or worse TIM applications every time you reseat your block. You can do a nice lap job and then get a bad TIM application and lose more than you gained as described in this thread. I lapped my CPU because let's face it, Intel knows how to build chips, but they aren't anywhere near flat.
__________________My advice,... If you like your temps, leave well enough alone. If you just can't sleep at night knowing your block isn't shiny underneath, please seek professional help... you'll need it later for more important things that arise in the real world. Tell tale sign something's wrong: If you're girlfriend/wife walks into the room and says, you spend more time lapping that block than lapping... Well, you've got issues.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
I actually do want lower temps, and lapping can get you a degree or two here or there, but I am not prepared to void the warranty on any of my products. IMO my GF should be able to look into the bottom of my HK 3.0 to put her make-up on. A high quality item like the HK 3.0 should look better, but maybe it *looks* rough on the bottom because of the machine process needed to make it convex.And I figure I'll just add this in here to save someone a post, the HK 3.0 I have IS convex. I have put two straight edges on it (not razor blades, real straight edges) and the middle sticks out further towards the processor than the edges. I didn't break out a feeler gauge to see by how much, but I could see light around the edges for sure.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
I have the heatkiller performs great. It is all about how flat it is. Not how shiny it is....
__________________
Water Cooled Case suggestions Cosmos S w/Classified water cooled(1st) w/ heatkiller and feser 360 rad NZXT Tempest mod log(360 installed) (Fiance Build) Heatkiller Club NZXT Tempest User Community Xbox 360 mods thread http://www.overclock.net/xbox/435678...dders-out.html
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Quote:
Flat = Flat, Shiny = Shiny, Flat =/= Shiny.
__________________
AUSSIE OCN CLUB | 8 Gigs of RAM Club | CM 690 Club"Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt = FUD = Fudzilla" - Danylu in a MSN Chat I am not a fanboy, I have a Core 2 Duo E8300 and Pentium Dual Core E2180 as well as the CPU in my sig rig, I also have multiple nVidia cards (6800GS, 9400GT, 9600GT) as well as two ATI. (HD4890 + HD2400Pro) Using my backup rig for nostalgia factor. I'm boycotting any games made by Activision until Kotick says bye bye.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
Quote:
As I said it does not matter about it being shiny if you lap a cpu or heatsink you only need to go up to 800 anything higher than is just a bonus to make it shiny and no performance gain really at all The hk is number one for a reason.. http://www.overclock.net/water-cooli...blocks-i7.html
__________________
Water Cooled Case suggestions Cosmos S w/Classified water cooled(1st) w/ heatkiller and feser 360 rad NZXT Tempest mod log(360 installed) (Fiance Build) Heatkiller Club NZXT Tempest User Community Xbox 360 mods thread http://www.overclock.net/xbox/435678...dders-out.html
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]() |
I still can't quite understand why it matters for the *bottom* of a block to be shiny. That "shine" is going to be ruined with some burnt on TIM anyways, so what is the big deal? Shine has nothing to do with flatness which leads to it having nothing to do with temperature performance.
__________________
| Crimson Shadow Build! | | The Samsung Owners Club ||-Mozilla Firefox Club-| |We Are Gr33n Machine | | _₌=The Q9550 Club=₌_ |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
Ok, I think there is confusion. Let me use another analogy. We have all see circus mirrors. A circus mirror is made of glass and it is smooth on the outside, but it has a big wave in it which makes it not flat. The same is true with a processor, heat sink, or anything else you polish or lap. If the shiner something is the smoother it is. And even though smoothness does not equal complete flatness of the item in question, smoothness does mean that an item is flat in a very, very isolated area. Althought the performance increase due to shine/smoothness is negligable (if even noticeable at all) there is still a difference.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]() |
And my point is, if that difference is negligible as you stated for a part of the block that you DON'T see, then why does it matter?
__________________
| Crimson Shadow Build! | | The Samsung Owners Club ||-Mozilla Firefox Club-| |We Are Gr33n Machine | | _₌=The Q9550 Club=₌_ |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|