|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Cooling > Water Cooling | |
Series vs Parallel?
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker in Training
|
Does anyone have any info concerning W/C circuit setup comparing series versus parallel? I have plenty of pump(Swiftech MCP655) and Swiftech Blocks(Apogee GTX with a MCW-NBMAX to be added soon).
Thanks for any info-Chuck
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
2 + 2 = 5
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In a Chair.
Posts: 34,975
Rep: 4176
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 1911
Trader Rating: 56
|
Run serial.
NB block generally have less resistence... so more water would be flowing through your NB. While your NB may get better temps, your CPU will be hotter. Not worth it.
__________________
To answer most of your questions: (1) a fridge cannot cool a PC (2) 64-bit OS for over 3.4GB (3) If a PCIe card fits, it should work (4) Resolution, not screen size (5) If you have a question, it is not news (6) Report, not respond to Spam (7) Single-Rail/Non-Modular PSUs are not always better than Multi-Rail/Modular
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Hellspawn or Hell's Pawn?
![]() |
Series circuit, but with rad between the CPU and pump.
If you go parallel more water might go by the NB instead of the CPU because of lower resistance. edit: DuckieHo ninja-edited my response into his Read just "Run serial." before, lol. Take that!
__________________
It's "I couldn't care less" (Because you don't care)
Last edited by Adrienspawn : 3 Weeks Ago at 05:08 PM |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]() |
as far as I know from my fluid dynamics physics course you should keep your flows in series to reduce tubulent flows. but you are trying to reduce heat here and I think that when you have more tubing you are increasing surface area, therefore it would be better to go parallel.
my two cents
__________________
[
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
"Directive"
![]() |
If it is just the two blocks there's no need for parallel. And you can run it to the NB first or the CPU first, neither will affect the water's temp enough to hamper temps on the other.
I see Ira's in here so I'll just leave it at that lol.
__________________
Intel:MainRig i7 920@4.62 1.39v/BloodRage/6GB DDR3@2000/HD4870X2 Intel:Secondary E7400@4.0 1.25v/DX38BT/4GB DDR3@1333/2XHD3870 AMD:HTPC 2400-BE/A7GM-S 2.0/2GB DDR2@855/HDMI *******Current Project: WallHanger Build*******
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
unless you downsize the tubing so you have different flows (this btw would be such a pain in the ass to figure out how much to downsize by) you should just go series (why is it i say something then read up the page and everyone else says exactly what i say? really should start reading the replies b4 i answer)
__________________
the soldier ![]() life is simply a hard drive..... when it gets all disorganized defrag the dam thing if you dont like me spelling or grammer, do tell, but more importantly, dont whine about other peoples language skillz you annoying buggers
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Habitual Tinkerer
![]() |
Quote:
... ..You guys have it covered already.
__________________
Quote:
![]() **E8600 @ 5751Mhz ***OCN Water Cooling Club And Picture Gallery ***150 Opty @ 3242Mhz **
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker in Training
|
Thanks to everyone that responded. A lot of these water cooling problems seem like common sense, but in practice, don't work out that way(e.g. My CPU runs cooler with my pump set at #5 than at #10).
__________________Thanks again-Chuck
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|