Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Cooling > Water Cooling

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-06-09   #11 (permalink)
Case Modder
 
intel ati

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 594

Rep: 37 Infrabasse is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 30
Trader Rating: 0
Default

I think the point where my reflexion is flawed is that I'm picturing heatpipes as tube-like TECs that would stay at ambient on one side and get really hot on the other.

BTW, we always talk about water temperature, but it's the actual copper block that cools the CPU. What kind of temps are we seeing on the actual copper blocks?
__________________
Work in progress

System: noname
CPU
Q6600
Motherboard
Asus P5Q-E
Memory
8GB Corsair XMS2 PC8500
Graphics Card
EAH5870
Hard Drive
OCZ Vertex 60, Areca 1230 with many HDDs
Sound Card
onboard
Power Supply
Corsair TX 850
Case
Lian-Li PC-V2010B
CPU cooling
Noctua NH-C12P
GPU cooling
stock
OS
7 ultimate x64
Monitor
3x Dell Ultrasharp U2410

Last edited by Infrabasse : 11-06-09 at 10:08 AM
Infrabasse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-09   #12 (permalink)
Tweaking Addict
 
Slider46's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,761

Rep: 363 Slider46 is a proven memberSlider46 is a proven memberSlider46 is a proven memberSlider46 is a proven member
Unique Rep: 276
Trader Rating: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrabasse View Post
What kind of temps are people hitting when using madly ventilated direct contact heatpipe HSFs?
What I'm picturing would basically be that but replace the fans with a waterblock ...
And then maybe mildly watercool the opposite side of the pipes at the CPU end.

If that could get us 5c lower I'm sure their'll be people to fork out the extra cash.
Oh well if that's not gonna work, you can't blame me for trying
Well designed air-cooling setups are compairable to most average water-cooling setups.

I understand your concept but I doubt it's going to perform any better.

If the heat from the CPU has already traveled to the heatpipes and up to the fins of the heatsink - why add another interface through which the heat has to transfer before being dissapated? You're adding another barrier through which the heat has to transfer when it would be simpler and probably more efficient to just slap a fan on some fins attached to the heatpipes, OR go with watercooling from the get-go.

No problem with thinking outside the box though

Direct-Die liquid cooling is already implimented for some high-end systems (pretty sure I read that somewhere recently) so maybe it's possible to bring it down to a level where it would be feasible for consumer use

System: Gunmetal
CPU
Q9550 @ 4.0Ghz - 1.216 Vcore (8.0x) (E0 Stepping)
Motherboard
Gigabyte EP45-UD3L - 500 FSB - Danger Den NB Block
Memory
4GB OCZ Blade 1150 @ 1200mhz 5-5-5-15 (1.86v)
Graphics Card
EVGA GTX 260 (Core216) 55nm 896MB 759/1581/1285
Hard Drive
640GB AALS / 750GB AALS / 40GB External
Sound Card
Creative 7.1 with X-Fi Driver Mod
Power Supply
Corsair 520HX (Modular)
Case
Custom MDF Tech Station
CPU cooling
Danger Den MPC-CPU Quad Block / GTX 240 & GTX M184
GPU cooling
Bitspower Black Freezer VG-NGTX260C
OS
Vista Home Premium 64-bit
Monitor
22" Acer @ 1680 x 1050
Slider46 is offline Overclocked Account Slider46's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-09   #13 (permalink)
Tweaking Addict
 
Slider46's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,761

Rep: 363 Slider46 is a proven memberSlider46 is a proven memberSlider46 is a proven memberSlider46 is a proven member
Unique Rep: 276
Trader Rating: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrabasse View Post
BTW, we always talk about water temperature, but it's the actual copper block that cools the CPU. What kind of temps are we seeing on the actual copper blocks?
Are you referring to TEC coolers? On a standard ambient water-cooling setup, the copper block just transfers the heat from the chip to the cooling liquid.

TEC coolers produce sub-ambient temps on one side and produce heat on the other side and thus the need for liquid cooling (for the hot side)

System: Gunmetal
CPU
Q9550 @ 4.0Ghz - 1.216 Vcore (8.0x) (E0 Stepping)
Motherboard
Gigabyte EP45-UD3L - 500 FSB - Danger Den NB Block
Memory
4GB OCZ Blade 1150 @ 1200mhz 5-5-5-15 (1.86v)
Graphics Card
EVGA GTX 260 (Core216) 55nm 896MB 759/1581/1285
Hard Drive
640GB AALS / 750GB AALS / 40GB External
Sound Card
Creative 7.1 with X-Fi Driver Mod
Power Supply
Corsair 520HX (Modular)
Case
Custom MDF Tech Station
CPU cooling
Danger Den MPC-CPU Quad Block / GTX 240 & GTX M184
GPU cooling
Bitspower Black Freezer VG-NGTX260C
OS
Vista Home Premium 64-bit
Monitor
22" Acer @ 1680 x 1050
Slider46 is offline Overclocked Account Slider46's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-09   #14 (permalink)
Case Modder
 
intel ati

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 594

Rep: 37 Infrabasse is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 30
Trader Rating: 0
Default

No for that question I was on about a normal watercooling setup with a normal block.
The block certainly isn't at water temperature, so my question was what kind of temp is the block base compared to the water?

Now I don't know the exact science behing heatpipes but if they are able to displace all the heat from one side to the other and we can cool the hot end adequately, then the cool side of the pipe (cpu side in direct IHS contact) could drop to ambient....
But that's probably not the case and that's where my mistake would be.




edit: IBM is working on a within-die watercooling system, is that what you read recently? Because what I read about direct IHS and direct die watercooling (within a "half waterblock") is a total FAIL.
edit: and true, the second waterblock on the bottom end of the pipe was just stupid thinking on my side
__________________
Work in progress

System: noname
CPU
Q6600
Motherboard
Asus P5Q-E
Memory
8GB Corsair XMS2 PC8500
Graphics Card
EAH5870
Hard Drive
OCZ Vertex 60, Areca 1230 with many HDDs
Sound Card
onboard
Power Supply
Corsair TX 850
Case
Lian-Li PC-V2010B
CPU cooling
Noctua NH-C12P
GPU cooling
stock
OS
7 ultimate x64
Monitor
3x Dell Ultrasharp U2410

Last edited by Infrabasse : 11-07-09 at 06:09 AM
Infrabasse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-09   #15 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
c5pilot's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 162

Rep: 22 c5pilot is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 17
Trader Rating: 0
Default

I see this as more of a chip manufacturers problem than ours. Take Intel for instance, they can barely cool their CPU's with their own HSF at stock speeds. This has to be a huge concern for them. Forget about overclocking, they need to worry about getting stock temps down so a simple HSF can cool their chips, or they have to decide to go with a more elaborate cooling system which means more headaches after the sale.

Cooling a CPU from only one surface is not helping matters. I "thought" they realized this when they came out with the PII. But for whatever reason, CPU's are surface mounted again. Who knows, they may be forced to mount multiple CPUs around the MB just to find room to cool them separately.

It's no wonder CPU speed is not compounding nearly as quickly as the "old" days. They simply can't cool them with simple technology anymore. I think chip makers will inevitably have to embrace another method other than air.

Our problem isn't so much the design of the blocks, it's using ambient temp coolant. To get to the next step you need to chill below ambient.

System: Back to Basics
CPU
i7 920 D0 @ 4.00 1.28v
Motherboard
Asus P6T Deluxe V2
Memory
6GB OCZ Gold 1600
Graphics Card
PNY9800GT
Hard Drive
OCZ 120GB SSD & 1T's
Sound Card
onboard
Power Supply
OCZ 700W ModXtream-Pro
Case
TT Black Shark
CPU cooling
Heatkiller 3.0 LT
GPU cooling
Aquarius II
OS
XP Pro SP3
Monitor
X2Gen 22" LCD

Last edited by c5pilot : 11-06-09 at 09:03 PM
c5pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-09   #16 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 497

Rep: 38 zipdogso is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 18
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrabasse View Post

Now I don't know the exact science behing heatpipes but if they are able to displace all the heat from one side to the other and we can cool the hot end adequately, then the cool side of the pipe (cpu side in direct IHS contact) could drop to ambient....
But that's probably not the case and that's where my mistake would be.
Using heatpipes the CPU could be cooled adequately with proper sintered heatpipes i.e. not the ones they usually use in after-market coolers generally these are the cheaper mesh type. With a properly constructed block on the CPU for the HOT ends of the heatpipes (were the evaporation of the coolant takes place.) and the cold ends could even be extended out of the case to to be cooled by external fans. One of the bad points is that most people these days have vertically mounted mobo's and ALL heatpipes work best wilth a straight vertical run.
A single 12mm dia. sintered heatpipe at room temp. can shift a maximum of about 150w and that was measured in the horizontal position, vertical will obviously be a tad better and the warmer confines of a PC would make the maximum wattage go up a bit as well but like I said we are talking about a proper industrial heatpipe not something you can rescue one weekend from a redundant cooler.
zipdogso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-09   #17 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
mini1337s's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 91

Rep: 4 mini1337s Unknown
Unique Rep: 4
Trader Rating: 1
Default

It surprises me that we do not see people selling IHF heatsinks/blocks that are one unit. Direct-die cooling probably wouldn't be cost-effective for any company at a consumer level, wheras seperating the gap between heatspreader and block seems like it wouldn't add much difference to the manufacturing process, but would lower temperatures by several degrees even when used at stock levels. While I may be wrong, it only seems logical that this is true, as you can observe temperature differences between thermal pastes, whether through chemical property or proper application. To be honest, I'm surprised I haven't seen a custom waterblock designed this way, but I may just have missed the thread

Anyways, at the end of the day, Intel and AMD probably don't worry too much about creating extremely effective cooling options as a majority of users will run the processors at stock speeds for a fairly short life-span. I mean, all effective cooling adds is the ability to clock higher-speeds and longer lifespan, both not huge deals to a majority of consumers. Really though, how long does the average joe keep his computer? 3-5 years max? And how important is it to the average joe to overclock his components? Max performance is more an enthusiast thing as average consumer and companies are willing to dish out more money for technology anyways, something Intel and AMD take advantage of. It would be awesome to see high performancing cooling in every computer, but if the masses don't demand, Intel and AMD won't bother supplying.
My
__________________
System: My System
CPU
i7 920 @ 3.04 ghz
Motherboard
Asus P6T
Memory
3 Gigabytes Patriot Viper (1333)
Graphics Card
EVGA GTX 260 896MB (Stock)
Hard Drive
120 Gig OCZ Summit SSD
Power Supply
PC Power and Cooling Silencer (910w)
Case
Rosewill Wind Ryder
CPU cooling
Prolimatech Megahalem
OS
Vista, Ubuntu 9.04
Monitor
24' Hanns G
mini1337s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-09   #18 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
Digital Artist's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 370

Rep: 21 Digital Artist is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 15
Trader Rating: 0
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by c5pilot View Post
Our problem isn't so much the design of the blocks, it's using ambient temp coolant. To get to the next step you need to chill below ambient.
I approve of this post
__________________
System: Hydralisk (my 2nd System)
CPU
i7 920 #3939B215 - 4.0 GHz @ 1.3 v
Motherboard
Asus Rampage II Extreme
Memory
6x2 GB DDR3 Mushkin Redline 1600 MHz 6-7-6-18
Graphics Card
GIGABYTE GV-R597D5-2GD-B Radeon HD 5970
Hard Drive
300 GB VelociRaptor + 750 GB Caviar Black
Sound Card
SupremeFX X-Fi
Power Supply
Enermax Revolution85+ 950 W
Case
Cooler Master ATCS 840
CPU cooling
HK 3.0 CU + Backplate | Enzotech AS-REII-RAM
GPU cooling
DD HD 5970 | Enzotech AS-REII-SN | AS-REII-MOS
OS
OSX, Win XP, Win 7
Monitor
Dell 2209WA
Digital Artist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-09   #19 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 497

Rep: 38 zipdogso is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 18
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c5pilot View Post
Our problem isn't so much the design of the blocks, it's using ambient temp coolant. To get to the next step you need to chill below ambient.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Artist View Post
I approve of this post
Which is exactly why intel and AMD wont provide anymore than an HSF combo it is too expensive and making it idiot proof is too hard....after all even PC noobs sometimes have problems installing a HSF !!!

Decent CPU cooling will always be an after market exercise and as the the TDP's rise the onus will be on us to provide sufficient cooling.

Last edited by zipdogso : 11-07-09 at 06:03 AM
zipdogso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-09   #20 (permalink)
Intel Overclocker
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 247

Rep: 18 Tommie Unknown
Unique Rep: 17
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrabasse View Post
I still don't understand why it wouldn't work better ...
The wall we're hitting is the innability to displace the heat from the surface of the CPU fast enough, right?
Current blocks efficiency I believe are dictated by the thickness of the base (which is required to expand the water/copper area) and the efficiency of the channel design.

now if we used direct IHS contact heatpipes we'd basically only be limited by the heatpipes contact area and wall thickness. And we could carry away more heat than we currently do using a larger block on the other end of the pipes.

edit: I posted this before reading the above post. I'm still taking that one in
You only add more layers between the CPU and the water.
__________________
System: You dont give a pc a name
CPU
Q9550 C1 3,71 Ghz
Motherboard
Asus P5Q-E
Memory
OCZ Pl 1066 Cl5
Graphics Card
HD 4870 1GB 825/900
Hard Drive
/care?
Power Supply
CM Realpower M620
Case
CM 690
CPU cooling
Mugen 2
GPU cooling
Accellero Twin Turbo
OS
XP
Monitor
T220
Tommie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2010 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.17428 seconds with 8 queries