|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
just curious if i had a big res would that help with my temps.. i mean more water so it would take longer to heat up the loop so it would keep the system cooler longer right.. or prolong the amount if time it takes to reach full temp.. at least this is my logic would this be correct or does it not matter
__________________
Quote:
Sexy Unix Commands: date; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime;
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Blocksmith
|
There has been lots of debate on this, I have a 1 gallon res w/heatercore and can run with the fans off for a long time. IMO it helps.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Sexy Unix Commands: date; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime;
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
I have a single 5.25'' bay reservoir and the coolant moves through fairly quickly. I can see how more standing water would bring warmer water closer to room temp than a smaller res. I don't see a significant difference though, as the coolant is going through the radiator anyway.
__________________
CPU-Z Validation Click to view my rig's showcase! Watercooling pics UP!!! 2nd Rig: P4 630 @ 3.68GHz, Abit Fatal1ty, GeIL DDR2 667 2x 512 MB, Asus Geforce N6200TC, Aspire 520W, Aspire X-plorer Case, WD 160GB. Laptop: Dell Inspiron 9100: Pentium 4 3.2GHz HT, 100GB ATA, 1GB (2x512) Samsung DDR 200, WUXGA 15.4'' Widescreen.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Sexy Unix Commands: date; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime;
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
|
Just a thought... but with 600-1200l/h pumps that are used in WC systems... You would probably have to have a massive... massive RES to get any benifit.
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Sexy Unix Commands: date; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime;
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Blocksmith
|
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
CPU-Z Validation Click to view my rig's showcase! Watercooling pics UP!!! 2nd Rig: P4 630 @ 3.68GHz, Abit Fatal1ty, GeIL DDR2 667 2x 512 MB, Asus Geforce N6200TC, Aspire 520W, Aspire X-plorer Case, WD 160GB. Laptop: Dell Inspiron 9100: Pentium 4 3.2GHz HT, 100GB ATA, 1GB (2x512) Samsung DDR 200, WUXGA 15.4'' Widescreen.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
a larger res will keep temps down for a limited period of time, the length of that period increasing as the volume of the reservoir increases
but sooner or later, the entire system (including the reservoir) will reach equilibruim, and you'll get the same temps that you would've with either no res, or a smaller res theres no true benifit to having a larger res, and there's been lots of debate on it, but its proven that a larger reservoir will NOT lower system temps, becuase the water in the res will eventually equalize to the temp of the rest of the system, so the extra volume basically becomes unimportant
__________________
« IHS/Heatsink/Waterblock Lapping Guide/FAQ »
Get The Absolute Best Temps Possible!
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|