|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Software, Programming and Coding > Operating Systems > Windows | |
OEM Clarification
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Bifford
![]() |
I am tired of reading so many posts suggesting that you may install an OEM copy of a Windows OS on multiple computers and still retain a proper license. Just because you call up and ask for a license key and you are given one does NOT make it OK. Not getting caught is not the same thing as being allowed. The operators that are manning those phone lines do not have the training (or inclination) to determine if you are installing on a new machine or not. The license is clear; OEM = one machine only.
OEM licenses are cheaper for a reason, and it has very little to do with not having a box. It is cheaper because eventually you will need a new machine and will then have to buy another copy of the OS. So next time someone suggests that installing an OEM OS on a new (read: not the original) computer is OK; will get a Piracy Infraction. Notes:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Helpful Posts (Hopefully )Overclocker's Calculator Photo Editing - B&W w/Color Accents
Last edited by BFRD : 03-26-08 at 01:34 PM. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Bifford
![]() |
Update: I spent about an hour on the phone with Microsoft this morning to try and get some more detailed answers.
Here is a document written primarily for Educator Systems Admins, but I have been assured that the OEM portions apply to all OEM products (XP & Vista included). Here are some snippits: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I also asked specifically about cases where the MS activation line will give out activation codes for invalid licenses. He acknowledged that this practice does occur and stresses that you will not be proteced if audited. You are expected to follow the licensing guidlines. If you request a re-activation code for a new machine (as defined above) you may still be prosecuted even if you were given the code from Microsoft. Granted that you would have to be audited, but there was a suggestion that changes to that specific area might be forthcoming. Quote:
**Note This document does contain a broken link that seems like it would describe in more detail what minor hardware changes are allowed. I have a second request into Microsoft for an updated link.
__________________
Helpful Posts (Hopefully )Overclocker's Calculator Photo Editing - B&W w/Color Accents
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Bifford
![]() |
Here is a link to the missing document referenced above. I do realize there are differences between XP and Vista, but as I found out this morning the only seem to apply to retail copies and when the retail copy requires re-activation (which can be done as often as required).
Update: Thread Closed. Initially I had wanted to keep this thread open for discussion. However, that has become overly frustrating. Microsoft has created a product and they can decide how they want to enforce thier license. Here, we will enforce the rules set forth by microsoft as confirmed by the License Specialist. You may not agree with thier rules (or ours) but that doesn't change how they will be enforced. If Microsoft says you can be held accountable for (truthfully) aquiring a key from thier staff then that is what it is. Many laws don't make any sense, but we still must abide by them. I will be happy to discuss this with anyone, send me a PM or catch up with me in the chat room.
__________________
Helpful Posts (Hopefully )Overclocker's Calculator Photo Editing - B&W w/Color Accents
Last edited by BFRD : 03-26-08 at 11:17 AM. |
|||||||||||||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|