Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Software, Programming and Coding > Operating Systems > Windows
Reload this Page Windows XP/Vista 64-bit... Isn't it really 37-bit?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-22-08   #1 (permalink)
Intel Overclocker
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 62

Rep: 4 CritiCal Unknown
Unique Rep: 4
Trader Rating: 0
Default Windows XP/Vista 64-bit... Isn't it really 37-bit?
Ok, so I know 64-bit versions of Vista and XP support 128 GB of RAM. But, 2^64 is 18 446 744 073 709 551 616 bytes, or 17 179 869 184 GB.

128GB is 2^37(=137438953500 bytes, or 128GB).

So 64-bit windows is really just 37-bit?
Or are you telling me the OS reserves 17 179 869 056 GB for other stuff?
__________________
Me: If I OC the CPU 66MHz on the FSB, the FSB : DRAM ratio will be 1:1
My best friend Herman: Err... What?

System: Old Bertha
CPU
Core 2 Duo E6550 G0		 Motherboard
ASUS Rampage Formula X48		 Memory
2x Crucial BallistiX 1GB 800MHz 		Graphics Card
Gainward GeForce GTX 260
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 250Gb + 40GB IBM		 Sound Card
SupremeFX 2		 Power Supply
OCZ StealthXStream 600W		 Case
Raidmax Smilodon ATX
CPU cooling
Stock		 GPU cooling
Stock		 OS
Windows XP pro 32-bit		 Monitor
HP L1810 (+ getting Acer 22")
CritiCal is offline CritiCal's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-08   #2 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
micfiygd's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 97

Rep: 0 micfiygd Unknown
Unique Rep: 0
Trader Rating: 0
Default
where did you get 2^64?
__________________
System: Area-51 7500
CPU
E8400 OC-3.6ghz		 Motherboard
Nvidia 680i		 Memory
4x1Gb DDR2 800 		Graphics Card
8800gt 1Gb memory
Hard Drive
2x seagate 250Gb RAID0		 Power Supply
750Watts
CPU cooling
Zalman 110mm		 OS
Vista 32 bit		 Monitor
Acer Al2216 (22")
micfiygd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-08   #3 (permalink)
AMD Overclocker
 
blupupher's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Katy, Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,901

Rep: 218 blupupher is acknowledged by manyblupupher is acknowledged by manyblupupher is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 180
Folding Team Rank: 133
Hardware Reviews: 1
Trader Rating: 23
Default
It is a software limit put on by MS, since all 64 bit vista versions support different amounts of memory, Basic (8gb), Premium (16gb) and Ultimate (128gb).
__________________
System: Pooter
CPU
X2 BE-2400 Brisbane		 Motherboard
EPoX EP-MF4-J3 AM2		 Memory
4 gigs (2x2) G. Skill DDR2 1000 		Graphics Card
eVGA 9600 GSO 384mb
Hard Drive
160g Samsung x2 (no RAID)		 Sound Card
Onboard		 Power Supply
Antec Earthwatts 500w		 Case
Rosewill 5717
CPU cooling
Zalman 9700 LED		 GPU cooling
Stock Dual Slot		 OS
XP Pro x86/ Vista Ultimate x64		 Monitor
Acer 19 inch LCD
Last edited by blupupher : 08-22-08 at 01:48 PM. Reason: added memory amounts
blupupher is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-08   #4 (permalink)
Overclocker
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 886

Rep: 58 tenzo19 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 57
Trader Rating: 4
Default
Wikipedia

The emergence of the 64-bit architecture effectively increases the memory ceiling to 2^64 addresses...

The limitation is within the OS; different versions of Vista for instance, support difference amounts of RAM.

EDIT: blupupher beat me to it
__________________
System: My System
CPU
Q6600 G0 @ 3.0GHz/1.17V		 Motherboard
GA-P35-DS3L		 Memory
A-DATA 2x2GB DDR2 800 		Graphics Card
eVGA 9800GX2
Hard Drive
WD 640GB		 Power Supply
OCZ 700W GamerXStream		 Case
Rocketfish "Lian-Li"
CPU cooling
D-Tek FuZion V2		 GPU cooling
D-Tek FuZion GFX 2		 OS
Windows Vista Ultimate x64		 Monitor
2x AL1917W
tenzo19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-08   #5 (permalink)
Intel Overclocker
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 62

Rep: 4 CritiCal Unknown
Unique Rep: 4
Trader Rating: 0
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by micfiygd View Post
where did you get 2^64?
Scientific calc Casio fx-82ES.

But why actually limit it on the Ultimate version? Ok, so I see that 17 million terabytes is the tiniest bit overkill, but you did pay for 64-bit. Not that the 64-bit version of XP is more expensive than the 32-bit one, but drivers may cause trouble.
__________________
Me: If I OC the CPU 66MHz on the FSB, the FSB : DRAM ratio will be 1:1
My best friend Herman: Err... What?

System: Old Bertha
CPU
Core 2 Duo E6550 G0		 Motherboard
ASUS Rampage Formula X48		 Memory
2x Crucial BallistiX 1GB 800MHz 		Graphics Card
Gainward GeForce GTX 260
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 250Gb + 40GB IBM		 Sound Card
SupremeFX 2		 Power Supply
OCZ StealthXStream 600W		 Case
Raidmax Smilodon ATX
CPU cooling
Stock		 GPU cooling
Stock		 OS
Windows XP pro 32-bit		 Monitor
HP L1810 (+ getting Acer 22")
Last edited by CritiCal : 08-22-08 at 05:16 PM.
CritiCal is offline CritiCal's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.

Contact Us - Overclock.net - Archive - Top

Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License Internet Security By ControlScan

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2008 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.24373 seconds with 8 queries