|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Software, Programming and Coding > Operating Systems > Windows | |
Unofficial 32 bit vs 64 bit thread and Windows verions comparison
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||
|
Fear the Wombat
![]() |
I'm writing this thread in hopes to reduce the amount of posts made asking:
Which version of Vista is better/right for me? Should I get 32 bit or 64 bit? So I will start with a chart comparing the features in all of the Vista version. ![]() Source Now for the million dollar question, which is better and what are the differences between 32 bit of 64 bit? Many peoples first response is "64 bit can use 4GB of ram and 32 bit cannot." While this is true, it is certainly not the only difference between the two. Here is a nice chart that explains some of the not so well known differences between the two. ![]() Source After looking at that chart you may wonder, how much of that really matters to me? Well for me the most important points of that chart are the maximum RAM that is usable, driver signing, and driver support. We have already covered the first one in that list, and the chart makes it pretty self explanatory. The second two are still very critical when choosing which version suites you better and may not be so clear. Driver signing means that MS requires that all device drivers must be digitally signed by the developer, this means you are less likely to download and install harmful drivers. Driver support is also a big issues because 32 bit drivers are not compatible with a 64 bit OS, and vice-versa. When 64 bit OS first came out this was an issue because hardware companies were not producing 64 bit drivers at the same rate they were working on 32 bit drivers, currently this is not as much of an issue. For Retail vs. OEM, see the link below. http://www.overclock.net/windows/156...ification.html If anyone wants anything added/corrected/changed just let me know. I'll update this as I can. MODS: Official and/or sticky if you'd like. Thanks
__________________
< Terms of Service/Rules > < OCN Professionalism Initiative > < My Windows Registry Script > < 32 vs. 64 Bit Thread > Ramrod 1.5 For sale!!
Last edited by stanrc : 08-23-08 at 11:21 PM. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
nVidia Enthusiast
|
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
|
yo just drop like 5oo bones and dual boot or get xp
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
|
64-bit is the way to go unless you have mission critical apps/hardware that are absolutely 32-bit only, IMHO.
__________________
Clean sig. *deep breath of fresh air*
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
|
Quote:
Nice to have a post to refere them to.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Multi-Quote King
|
Thank God for this. Now sticky it and put it in both Operating Systems and Windows forums.
Yes, I'm very demanding because I never want to see this question asked again... lol
__________________
"But you would be amazed by how many people think that the only reason to have a computer is to play games, and that playing games is all that anyone with a computer does." - dangerousHobo "Linux is everywhere, it is all around us, even now in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window, or you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go to church, when you pay your taxes. " - mbp"I have used a mac before. And they still don't have right click I mean come on." - aakar Blah, blah, can't hear you
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
For future purposes and how games advance it would be best for people to use 64 bit.
Eventually 3.2GB is not going to be enough for gaming as textures get larger and larger in size. Only problem is drivers. Soo make shure your hardware vendor has drivers beta or not. If not then you can't do it. For example if you had a sound card that only had 32 bit drivers or a printer that has 32bit. Then you would need to replace those if theres no drivers for it. But once you check and see theres drivers for all your hardware. Then go for it !!! ![]() ![]()
__________________
Desktop http://www.hammiestudios.com/desktop.jpg CPUID http://www.hammiestudios.com/cpuid.jpg GPUID http://www.hammiestudios.com/gpuid.jpg SpeedFan http://www.hammiestudios.com/speedfan.jpg
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Does this thread still hold true 64 bit will always be better than 32bit? for gaming? I plan to dual boot if possible.
__________________
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||
|
Fear the Wombat
![]() |
This thread is pretty current. The future is 64 bit, if you are getting a new system there is almost no reason not to go 64 bit.
The only reason I can see is availability issues or if you have a specific piece of hardware with no 64 bit support, but thats very rare these days.
__________________
< Terms of Service/Rules > < OCN Professionalism Initiative > < My Windows Registry Script > < 32 vs. 64 Bit Thread > Ramrod 1.5 For sale!!
|
||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|