Ryzen Essential Info with link to owners info DB - Page 36 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

Ryzen Essential Info with link to owners info DB

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #351 of 359 (permalink) Old 08-11-2017, 03:12 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 177
Rep: 5 (Unique: 5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin778 View Post

So looking at the previous posts my 1800X is actually better than average as it does 3925MHz <1.4V and all those 4.0GHz samples are myths.

I think it's more a case of most people having a very loose definition of "stable".
st0neh is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #352 of 359 (permalink) Old 08-12-2017, 02:40 AM - Thread Starter
Meddling user
 
gupsterg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Lurking over a keyboard
Posts: 7,160
Rep: 774 (Unique: 354)
Little update on using 1800X at stock, tweaking RAM and stability testing. HCI Memtest/GSAT etc has been ran first, no issues, shows RAM is AOK. As we all know the issue we face really is when CPU loaded and RAM is tweaked. RealBench makes the cores stick to 3.7GHz, so not useful, custom x264 also does the same. Y-Cruncher I have found handy but the old faithful Prime95 is sweetest biggrin.gif .

As 3333MHz Fast using VDDP: 0.900V SOC: 1.1V VDIMM: 1.39V ProcODT: 60 CAD BUS: 30 30 30 30 had been fine for various tests I decided to test 3466MHz The Stilt same setup, it lasted ~4hrs in P95 29.2.



So clearly 3466MHz The Stilt profile is failing when CPU boosts to max XFR IMO, as in the past on same HW at fixed CPU frequency of 3.9GHz it's a non issue. So back down to 3333MHz Fast.



Custom P95, 1 thread, 8 to 4096, RAM usage 13312MB. In resource monitor, mainly the 4 cores / 8 threads remain parked, as I use 50% core parking in W10C. We can see a core at 4024MHz and another 3924MHz.

I will test with 75% parked as well and try 2 threads, as 2 threads with 50% CP means more cores have the thread bounced around I don't see upto 4.1GHz XFR. Averages are wrong for CPU MHz as IMO monitoring can not poll CPU as fast as it is changing frequency.
gupsterg is offline  
post #353 of 359 (permalink) Old 09-19-2017, 11:47 AM
Tetrapyloctomist
 
Aenra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,431
Rep: 21 (Unique: 20)

Thank you so much for all this, had missed this thread :)

 

Much obliged @gupsterg


Pride, honour and purity.
Aenra is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #354 of 359 (permalink) Old 09-19-2017, 01:37 PM - Thread Starter
Meddling user
 
gupsterg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Lurking over a keyboard
Posts: 7,160
Rep: 774 (Unique: 354)
gupsterg is offline  
post #355 of 359 (permalink) Old 12-17-2017, 08:55 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Shatun-Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Skarasan Deep
Posts: 931
Rep: 94 (Unique: 48)
Great thread. Just got my Ryzen system up and running couple weeks ago and the OP is full of information. Thanks for collating all that for us thumb.gif


* Ryzen 7 2700X * Gigabyte Aorus X370 Gaming 5 *16GB Crucial Ballistix Elite DDR4 3200Mhz memory * 500GB Samsung 960 EVO NVMe M.2/500GB Crucial BX300
EVGA FTW2 1070 Ti * NZXT S340 Elite White
Shatun-Bear is offline  
post #356 of 359 (permalink) Old 12-17-2017, 09:09 AM
Tetrapyloctomist
 
Aenra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,431
Rep: 21 (Unique: 20)

One hopes the trend will continue for Pinnacle Ridge :)


Pride, honour and purity.
Aenra is offline  
post #357 of 359 (permalink) Old 01-17-2018, 03:55 PM - Thread Starter
Meddling user
 
gupsterg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Lurking over a keyboard
Posts: 7,160
Rep: 774 (Unique: 354)
Thanks guys glad you found info useful smile.gif .

I was looking for a water block to replace the EK one I got for ThreadRipper. Bykski have updated their A-Ryzen-Th-X biggrin.gif .



Then it seems we also have CPU-XPR-AM.





HardOCP testing placed the Bykski close to XSPC Raystorm Neo for TR, link. This later roundup features the XSPC offering, but not Byski. TR being used is differing and lower voltage then previous linked article. I would think if the Byski had been included in later testing it would have done well. Considering how cheaply these can be had on Aliexpress, the performance and various socket support on updated blocks, it seems like the block to get.
gupsterg is offline  
post #358 of 359 (permalink) Old 01-25-2018, 01:55 AM
Tinkerer
 
RossiOCUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 186
Rep: 2 (Unique: 2)
Quote: Originally Posted by gupsterg View Post
Little update on using 1800X at stock, tweaking RAM and stability testing. HCI Memtest/GSAT etc has been ran first, no issues, shows RAM is AOK. As we all know the issue we face really is when CPU loaded and RAM is tweaked. RealBench makes the cores stick to 3.7GHz, so not useful, custom x264 also does the same. Y-Cruncher I have found handy but the old faithful Prime95 is sweetest .

As 3333MHz Fast using VDDP: 0.900V SOC: 1.1V VDIMM: 1.39V ProcODT: 60 CAD BUS: 30 30 30 30 had been fine for various tests I decided to test 3466MHz The Stilt same setup, it lasted ~4hrs in P95 29.2.

*snip*

So clearly 3466MHz The Stilt profile is failing when CPU boosts to max XFR IMO, as in the past on same HW at fixed CPU frequency of 3.9GHz it's a non issue. So back down to 3333MHz Fast.

*snip*

Custom P95, 1 thread, 8 to 4096, RAM usage 13312MB. In resource monitor, mainly the 4 cores / 8 threads remain parked, as I use 50% core parking in W10C. We can see a core at 4024MHz and another 3924MHz.

I will test with 75% parked as well and try 2 threads, as 2 threads with 50% CP means more cores have the thread bounced around I don't see upto 4.1GHz XFR. Averages are wrong for CPU MHz as IMO monitoring can not poll CPU as fast as it is changing frequency.
Dude, can you please provide me with your BIOS settings .txt
TIA
RossiOCUK is offline  
post #359 of 359 (permalink) Old 01-26-2018, 01:31 AM - Thread Starter
Meddling user
 
gupsterg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Lurking over a keyboard
Posts: 7,160
Rep: 774 (Unique: 354)
I believe it would be these settings initially. If memory serve me correct I needed 1.4V as VDIMM/VBOOT to gain stability in various loads. The txt does not dump AMD CBS settings. I would have set CAD Bus there as 30 30 30 30. As I used 1DPC SS/SR I used BGS: Off and BGSA: On.

HTH .
Attached Files
File Type: txt 1501_X3466S60CAD_setting.txt (18.9 KB, 34 views)
gupsterg is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off