Updated! Ryzen R5 Unleashed - CPU & RAM OC tests - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

Updated! Ryzen R5 Unleashed - CPU & RAM OC tests

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 28 (permalink) Old 02-25-2019, 07:39 AM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
B4rr3L Rid3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 104
Rep: 6 (Unique: 6)
Updated! Ryzen R5 Unleashed - CPU & RAM OC tests




Ryzen performance comparison in different scenarios:

Dual-Channel vs Single-Channel (16GB sticks)
Manual memory OC 2933Mhz CL14 vs Default Auto Bios setting
Default Bios CPU clock vs 3.7GHz CPU OC
Games & Applications side by side
Results table and graphic

- 7-Zip
- Blender BMW 2019
- Strange Brigade DX12
- Dirt Rally DX11
- Metro Exodus DX12
- Handbrake
- Aida 64
- Forza 4 horizon
- War Thunder
more...

Conclusions:

1 - After 2866Mhz CL14 and forward the difference between Single-channel and Dual is minimal except for 7-Zip.
2 - For most games Memory clock and timing have more impact than dual channel against single.
3 - You can unleash up to 30% performance gains by tweaking your PC properly, that could be achieved while gaming with extra FPS (30 FPS increase in Dirt Rally!) and also while heavy working profissionally.
4 - better timing do help with performance but not as much as memory clocks.

| Msi x470 Gaming Plus | Ryzen 2700x | RX580Nitro+ | 2x 8GB Crucial Ballistix E-Die @3600Mhz CL16 | AX850W | 970 EVO | ESi X-Fi Prodigy | Mackie HR6 | LG UM34

Last edited by B4rr3L Rid3R; 03-08-2019 at 05:00 PM.
B4rr3L Rid3R is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 28 (permalink) Old 02-28-2019, 11:46 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Undervolter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,577
Rep: 519 (Unique: 255)
Thank you for testing applications too and especially 2 of my favourites, 7zip and Handbrake! I get tired of seeing people worrying only about games.

Ryzen 2600 - MSI B450 Gaming Plus - 16GB Corsair 3000Mhz C15 - GTX 750Ti
Undervolter is offline  
post #3 of 28 (permalink) Old 02-28-2019, 11:39 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
rdr09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: From the US but lives in Africa
Posts: 18,217
Rep: 858 (Unique: 627)
+Rep. Nice results, especially the increase in fps. Imagine if you can achieve a stable 3466 Cl14 at least for games, which I did and got a 61 in Aida using G.Skill FlareX. Currently using a cheaper G.Skill Ripjaws on my 1600. Without monitoring the fps, I don't see much any difference between the two rams, though. Just in benchmarks.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	docp 3200.JPG
Views:	10
Size:	77.9 KB
ID:	256526  


[email protected] 6 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2211392 4.6 @ 4 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2216580
5.0 @ 8 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2511322
2nd AMD Build
(10 items)
CPU
2700
Motherboard
X470
GPU
290
RAM
3200 CL14
Hard Drive
1000
Power Supply
700
Case
212
Operating System
10/64
Monitor
40 1080
Keyboard
M100
▲ hide details ▲
rdr09 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 28 (permalink) Old 03-01-2019, 05:49 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
cssorkinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,382
Rep: 462 (Unique: 262)
Quote: Originally Posted by rdr09 View Post
+Rep. Nice results, especially the increase in fps. Imagine if you can achieve a stable 3466 Cl14 at least for games, which I did and got a 61 in Aida using G.Skill FlareX. Currently using a cheaper G.Skill Ripjaws on my 1600. Without monitoring the fps, I don't see much any difference between the two rams, though. Just in benchmarks.
Did you happen to compare draw calls using futuremark's api feature test?
cssorkinman is offline  
post #5 of 28 (permalink) Old 03-01-2019, 09:58 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
rdr09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: From the US but lives in Africa
Posts: 18,217
Rep: 858 (Unique: 627)
Quote: Originally Posted by cssorkinman View Post
Did you happen to compare draw calls using futuremark's api feature test?
I just did but idk how to interpret them.

CPU stock RAM at 3200 Cl14 DOCP

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/34093435?

CPU stock RAM at 3466 Cl14 using Calculator.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/34093811?

The DX11 MT actually went down. Maybe my 3466 setting is not fully stable.

[email protected] 6 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2211392 4.6 @ 4 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2216580
5.0 @ 8 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2511322
2nd AMD Build
(10 items)
CPU
2700
Motherboard
X470
GPU
290
RAM
3200 CL14
Hard Drive
1000
Power Supply
700
Case
212
Operating System
10/64
Monitor
40 1080
Keyboard
M100
▲ hide details ▲
rdr09 is offline  
post #6 of 28 (permalink) Old 03-01-2019, 10:20 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Alpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 9
Rep: 0
Absolutely ! Ryzen needs good memory to reach better performance. Actually I've never seen anything like this stuff ! Performance gains from memory speeds is awesome ! A few days earlier made some test, here are some FC5 benchmark results. Nothing changed but mem speeds. 2133, 2800, 3466 mhz. Timing was 14-14-14-28 1T. I could manage this 3466c14 for 24/7 stable quite easy fortunately.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	138.0 KB
ID:	256584  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	137.8 KB
ID:	256586  

Click image for larger version

Name:	3.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	138.8 KB
ID:	256588  

Click image for larger version

Name:	4.png
Views:	12
Size:	86.4 KB
ID:	256590  

Alpi is offline  
post #7 of 28 (permalink) Old 03-01-2019, 04:04 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
cssorkinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,382
Rep: 462 (Unique: 262)
Quote: Originally Posted by rdr09 View Post
I just did but idk how to interpret them.

CPU stock RAM at 3200 Cl14 DOCP

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/34093435?

CPU stock RAM at 3466 Cl14 using Calculator.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/34093811?

The DX11 MT actually went down. Maybe my 3466 setting is not fully stable.
Certainly possible it wasn't completely stable , it's also a good idea to run it multiple times and average the results or kick out the high and low.

With first gen Ryzen I'd realize most of the gains by 2933 mhz - allowing the motherboard to set the timings for speeds of comparisons of 2133mhz and up.

Quote: Originally Posted by Alpi View Post
Absolutely ! Ryzen needs good memory to reach better performance. Actually I've never seen anything like this stuff ! Performance gains from memory speeds is awesome ! A few days earlier made some test, here are some FC5 benchmark results. Nothing changed but mem speeds. 2133, 2800, 3466 mhz. Timing was 14-14-14-28 1T. I could manage this 3466c14 for 24/7 stable quite easy fortunately.
Nice aida scores - FX rigs would make similar gains going from cl6 1600 to cl 10 2400 + , depending on the app and what was actually limiting fps.
cssorkinman is offline  
post #8 of 28 (permalink) Old 03-01-2019, 07:45 PM
⤷ αC
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10,659
Rep: 870 (Unique: 574)
I would run the same test on R7 1700X with 3466C14 but I'm on Linux and I don't have a RX 580.

API overhead with 3200C16 on my R7 2700X isn't that impressive though with AMD pro drivers.

DX 11 single thread over 2 Million is decent

https://www.anandtech.com/show/11223...k-api-overhead
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews...ng,4977-3.html
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews...pu,5025-3.html
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews...pu,5107-3.html

https://www.expreview.com/56597.html
i7-7700K + RX Vega 56 ~ 1.9Mil


------------


Random browsing the database:
[email protected] + TITAN V , 2.8Million DX11 single thread and ~4.55million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/239401
[email protected] + GTX 1080 ,3.2 million DX11 single thread and ~5million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/234573
[email protected] + gtx 1080 , 3.5million DX 11 single thread and ~ 5.3 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/256712
[email protected] + VEGA56 , 2.6million Dx11 single thread and ~2.3 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/259545
[email protected] + GTX 1070 , 2.56million DX11 single thread and ~2.64 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/200368?locale=en_GB
[email protected] + GTX 1080 , 2.5million DX11 single thread and ~3.7million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/207801?locale=en_GB
[email protected] + GTX 1070 , 2.9million Dx11 single thread and ~4.3million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/220187
[email protected] + RX 470, 2.3 Million Dx11 single thread and ~2.3 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/202653
[email protected] + GTX 1080 , 2.15 Million DX11 single thread and 2.75 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/181927?locale=en_GB
i7-7900X @4.3GHz + GTX 1080 , 2.2 Million DX11 single thread and ~ 4.1 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/221086
i7-5960X @4.4GHz + GTX 1080 , 2.2 Million DX11 single thread and ~2.5million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/201305
[email protected] + GTX1080 , 1.88million Dx11 single thread and ~2 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/205294
[email protected] + RX 470 , 2.25 million DX11 single thread and ~ 2.1 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/199856


(Ryzen)

R7 2700X @4.5GHz + GTX 1080 ti, 2.64 million single thread and ~4.47million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/284455
R7 [email protected] + GTX 1080 ti , 2.2Million Dx 11 single thread and ~3.9 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/251084
R7 1700 @3.8GHz + GTX 1070 , ~2.08Million Dx11 single thread and ~3.5 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/229943
R7 [email protected] + GTX 1080 , 2million DX11 single thread , ~2.2 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/199978
R7 [email protected] + Vega 64 , ~1.65 million DX11 single thread and ~1.65 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/293630
R7 [email protected] + GTX 1080 ti , ~2.4 million DX11 single thread and ~4.1million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/222809
R7 1800X + GTX 1070 , 1.97 million DX11 single thread and ~2 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/199230?locale=en_GB
TR [email protected] + Titan XP , ~1.87 million DX11 single thread and ~2.4 million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/253817
TR 1920X @4GHz + VEGA 64 ~1.36Million single thread and ~1.36Million multi https://www.3dmark.com/aot/286707

► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list



Last edited by AlphaC; 03-01-2019 at 08:23 PM.
AlphaC is online now  
post #9 of 28 (permalink) Old 03-01-2019, 10:32 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
rdr09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: From the US but lives in Africa
Posts: 18,217
Rep: 858 (Unique: 627)
Quote: Originally Posted by cssorkinman View Post
Certainly possible it wasn't completely stable , it's also a good idea to run it multiple times and average the results or kick out the high and low.

With first gen Ryzen I'd realize most of the gains by 2933 mhz - allowing the motherboard to set the timings for speeds of comparisons of 2133mhz and up.
Something wrong with 3DMark on my 2700 system. I ran same test on my R5 1600 and got 2.7M in DX 11 MT. Thing is, even in Firestrike, the 2700 used to get a physics score of 17K at stock, now just 12K. It does not ffect my games so no big deal.

Problem with the R5 1600, it won't run the Vulkan test. Just blinks. Could it be my GTX 1060?

[email protected] 6 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2211392 4.6 @ 4 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2216580
5.0 @ 8 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2511322
2nd AMD Build
(10 items)
CPU
2700
Motherboard
X470
GPU
290
RAM
3200 CL14
Hard Drive
1000
Power Supply
700
Case
212
Operating System
10/64
Monitor
40 1080
Keyboard
M100
▲ hide details ▲
rdr09 is offline  
post #10 of 28 (permalink) Old 03-01-2019, 10:55 PM
⤷ αC
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10,659
Rep: 870 (Unique: 574)
Are you running your drivers on multithread (threaded optimization) with shader cache?

► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list


AlphaC is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off