AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, 3800X and Ryzen 9 3900X - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, 3800X and Ryzen 9 3900X

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-26-2019, 10:07 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
FlanK3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Czech republic*Brno city
Posts: 1,443
Rep: 163 (Unique: 112)
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, 3800X and Ryzen 9 3900X

SUMMARY NOTES
AMD CPU launch will be  7.7. 2019 


New chipset name is AMD X570 with PCIe 4.0. (on the photo is Crosshair VIII motherboard)


IPC improvement is high 15%! It was supposed to be originally 10%. Doubled  FP and also doubled size of cache.


CPUs can be up to 16C/32T in theory, AMD showed CPU with two chiplets.  At launch day minimal 3 models are ready.

Ryzen 7 3700X, CPU with high performance and clocks are  3.6 GHz baseclock and turbo up to 4.4 GHz and TDP only 65W (it is 8C/16T CPU)!

-much better performance than current flagship Ryzen 7 2700X (propably close to 9900K in performance)

Ryzen 7 3800X is again eightcore with SMT, baseclock 3.9 GHz and turbo up to 4.5 GHz, TDP 105W

Surprise is the 3800X defeat i9-9900K not only in multithread  CinebenchR20 benchmark, but also in single thread. And i9-9900K has much higher clocks for single thread ( 5 GHz).

Finally, new Ryzen 9 is here! Information about the incoming  flagship Ryzen 9 3900X with 12C/24T. Default clocks is 3.8 GHz and turbo up to 4.6 GHz. TDP is still solid 105W!

performance demo test against Intel HEDT i9-9920X ...

Price list.

Ryzen Threadripper TBD ,-), Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 2400G, Ryzen 7 1800X, Ryzen 7 1700X, Ryzen 5 1500X, Ryzen 5 1600X, FX-8320E, FX-8370, FX-8370E, 2x FX-9590, 4x AMD FX-8350, 2x FX-8320, 2xFX-8300, 4xAMD FX-8150, AMD FX-8120 95W, AMD FX-8120 125W, AMD Phenom II x6 1100T BE, AMD Phenom II x6 1090T BE 4.3 GHz stable, AMD Phenom II x 980 BE, Phenom II x4 975 BE,Phenom II x4 970 BE, 2x Phenom II x4 965 BE C3, Phenom II x4 965 BE C2, Athlon 860K, Athlon 845, A10-7870K, 2xA10-7850K, 2x A10-7700K, A10-6800K, A10-6800B, A8-6600K, A10-5800K, A8-5600K, A10-3870K, A8-3850, Athlon 5150 Kabini,Intel core i9-7900X, Intel core i7-6950X, Intel core i7-5960X, core i7-3930K, i7-980X,3x Intel core i7-8700K, i7-7700K,i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, i7-4770K, i7-3770K, i7-2600K
AMD AIR cooling challenge Cinebench R10
FlanK3r is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-26-2019, 10:14 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
dantoddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,472
Rep: 35 (Unique: 30)
can we see a performance comparison between equally prices intel comparison including the new i9-9900KS. I think this looks like a clear win for AMD, but by how much is interesting question, especially for gaming. I'm also not too enthused by Navi at this point.

CPU
(4 items)
CPU
i7 8700k
GPU
RTX 2080Ti
RAM
16GB DDR4
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
▲ hide details ▲
dantoddd is offline  
post #3 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-26-2019, 10:30 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Prophet4NO1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,090
Rep: 162 (Unique: 119)
Let's hope it lives up to the hype. If these are as good as they claim in the real world, we are looking at a real monster lineup.
Prophet4NO1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-27-2019, 02:01 AM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
FlanK3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Czech republic*Brno city
Posts: 1,443
Rep: 163 (Unique: 112)
next models for launch:
https://videocardz.com/80798/amd-ryz...00x-at-499-usd

Ryzen Threadripper TBD ,-), Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 5 2400G, Ryzen 7 1800X, Ryzen 7 1700X, Ryzen 5 1500X, Ryzen 5 1600X, FX-8320E, FX-8370, FX-8370E, 2x FX-9590, 4x AMD FX-8350, 2x FX-8320, 2xFX-8300, 4xAMD FX-8150, AMD FX-8120 95W, AMD FX-8120 125W, AMD Phenom II x6 1100T BE, AMD Phenom II x6 1090T BE 4.3 GHz stable, AMD Phenom II x 980 BE, Phenom II x4 975 BE,Phenom II x4 970 BE, 2x Phenom II x4 965 BE C3, Phenom II x4 965 BE C2, Athlon 860K, Athlon 845, A10-7870K, 2xA10-7850K, 2x A10-7700K, A10-6800K, A10-6800B, A8-6600K, A10-5800K, A8-5600K, A10-3870K, A8-3850, Athlon 5150 Kabini,Intel core i9-7900X, Intel core i7-6950X, Intel core i7-5960X, core i7-3930K, i7-980X,3x Intel core i7-8700K, i7-7700K,i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, i7-4770K, i7-3770K, i7-2600K
AMD AIR cooling challenge Cinebench R10
FlanK3r is offline  
post #5 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-27-2019, 02:03 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
poah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: in a house
Posts: 612
Rep: 4 (Unique: 3)
I'm waiting for the 16 core unit before I upgrade
poah is offline  
post #6 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-27-2019, 02:23 AM
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Dreamliner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 426
Rep: 3 (Unique: 3)
It looks like the 9900K/3800X are pretty much identical. What I don’t understand is how the 9700K is getting walloped by the 3700X, you’d think there was a core count difference or something...?

Nice to see AMD competing on an IPC level again. Hopefully this will drive Intel to do some real R&D and bring down their prices.

The 3900X looks like an awesome bargain!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0862.jpeg
Views:	248
Size:	385.4 KB
ID:	271620  


|| 7820X @ 4.5Ghz | GTX1080Ti | TUF MARK 1 X299 | 32GB | 970 Pro 1TB | Define R4 | Air | Silent ||

Last edited by Dreamliner; 05-27-2019 at 02:26 AM.
Dreamliner is offline  
post #7 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-27-2019, 02:35 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
hickelpickle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 11
Rep: 0
The 9700k is only 8 cores no hyperthreading, while the 3700x 8c/16t. 3700x is same as 3800k just a lower bin/clock.
hickelpickle is offline  
post #8 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-27-2019, 02:43 AM
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Dreamliner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 426
Rep: 3 (Unique: 3)
Quote: Originally Posted by hickelpickle View Post
The 9700k is only 8 cores no hyperthreading, while the 3700x 8c/16t. 3700x is same as 3800k just a lower bin/clock.
Oh that’s right, I forgot about the hyperthreading bit. That makes sense.

Are you sure the 3700X and 3800X are the same? The 3700X is only 65W but the 3800X is 105W.

|| 7820X @ 4.5Ghz | GTX1080Ti | TUF MARK 1 X299 | 32GB | 970 Pro 1TB | Define R4 | Air | Silent ||
Dreamliner is offline  
post #9 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-27-2019, 03:16 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
ibb27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 241
Rep: 14 (Unique: 11)
I'll get R7 3700X with Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Impact. Can't wait to build new PC!
Effectively doubling cores and threads to my current config, thank you AMD!
ibb27 is offline  
post #10 of 733 (permalink) Old 05-27-2019, 03:31 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
deepor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,747
Rep: 474 (Unique: 320)
Quote: Originally Posted by Dreamliner View Post
Oh that’s right, I forgot about the hyperthreading bit. That makes sense.

Are you sure the 3700X and 3800X are the same? The 3700X is only 65W but the 3800X is 105W.
I would assume it's the same hardware design, it's just the turbo clocks set up differently for the default BIOS settings. The 105W model will keep the clock higher when all cores are in use.
deepor is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off