Originally Posted by iNeri
Well, at same voltage and timings i can only get 3400 on the CH6E vs 3466 mhz on the taichi :/
It could be worse xD
Forget it, as soon i mod voltage or OC to CPU this ram OC dont work anymore. Cant pass the test no matter what i do. Damn it Asus, if this mobo come to the market 6 months later than C6H why you dont take care of, at least tunned the mobo to be equal on RAM OC :@
Anyway. With UV to -.075 LLC2, default enhacer and custom PBO to 200-110-150 i can get 3333 OC ram at 1.39v:
I dont know, on the taichi i was able to do 102 bclk OC and UV -.0375v. The RAM oc there was 3466 CL14-15-14-14 GD disabled 1t. Totally stable.
Other thing is, if i put 102 bclk here the latency goes as if i manual OC on cache NS: L1 1.0 ns L2 3.0ns L3 9.0+ ns while on the taichi with bclk i get L1 0.9 ns L2 2.8 NS LC 8.6 ns.
If i use bclk OC this mobo do 2 post from a cold boot. The taichi no problem, even boots faster. And while i run TM5 stress test on the taichi i can use the PC no problem, here is unusable while running.
Its a beauty piece of hardware, tons of features. It hurts that the performance is low than a lower end MOBO. I mean, is not Asrock the low cost brand of asustek? well, they doing it better