j[Techspot] Asrock X99E-ITX review - Page 2 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

j[Techspot] Asrock X99E-ITX review

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #11 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-28-2015, 08:42 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
pcfoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: 10 TZ from home...
Posts: 3,370
Rep: 261 (Unique: 204)
You are kidding, right?
A ITX 970 4GB from ASUS or Gigabyte is what? 150-170W.
Add 250W tops for a clocked s2011-3 i7, or half that if it is @ stock speeds. Next is summed up at 20-30W tops.

A 350W PSU is fine for stock clocks, a 450 is super safe, a 600W fine for overclocking.
I bet you that 90% of its life "on" it will be drawing less than 200W for the average OCN user.

And there are numerous ITX cases that accept full ATX PSUs, you don't have to go SFF, even for something as small as a CM Elite 110.

[Build Log] the FooBox - Watercooled 540 AIR, and 2700 threads
Forgive my rants - I am harmless - Nullius in verba after all.


pcfoo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-28-2015, 08:52 PM
Linux Lobbyist
 
She loved E's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,651
Rep: 94 (Unique: 67)
This is the future. I'm in when it goes on sale for $250.


She loved E is offline  
post #13 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-28-2015, 08:54 PM
Retired Staff
 
Mad Pistol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,207
Rep: 280 (Unique: 201)
The draw of this motherboard is an 8-core high-power intel CPU in a tiny toaster-sized computer case. Put a mini-ITX GTX 970 with it, and you've got yourself one of the baddest gaming/workstation systems around... in one of the tiniest enclosures you can imagine.

Why would you get something like this? Simple... because you can, and it's freakin badass. thumb.gif



EDIT: Also, check the benchmarks. If the benchmarks are indicative of actual performance, ASRock has created a midget beast!



Mad Pistol is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #14 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-28-2015, 09:29 PM
Linux Lobbyist
 
dsmwookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 808
Rep: 17 (Unique: 16)
I m all about that 8 core and dual gpu combo.

dsmwookie is offline  
post #15 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-28-2015, 09:54 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
iceman595's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 399
Rep: 9 (Unique: 9)
put a 16 core and a titan x on that little dude, also it would be cool to have support for ecc ram.
iceman595 is offline  
post #16 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-29-2015, 12:47 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
one80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 266
Rep: 1 (Unique: 1)
I've gotta get one - if just for the novelty smile.gif

I don't need a multi GPU setup, but got X99 for the extra cores so this suits me well.

Asus have mentioned they are doing a small X99, I'd assume mATX but will be interesting to see if they do an MITX to compete...

NCase M1 | Intel i7 8700K 5.2 (air) | Zotac 1070ti Mini | Asis Z370-I ITX | GSkill Trident Z 32GB 3800Corsair SF600 | Samsung 970 Evo M.2 256GB | Samsung 960 Evo M.2 1TB | Aktimate A2+ | Dell U3011
one80 is offline  
post #17 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-29-2015, 01:47 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
James296's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 208
Rep: 11 (Unique: 9)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Pistol View Post

The draw of this motherboard is an 8-core high-power intel CPU in a tiny toaster-sized computer case. Put a mini-ITX GTX 970 with it, and you've got yourself one of the baddest gaming/workstation systems around... in one of the tiniest enclosures you can imagine.

Why would you get something like this? Simple... because you can, and it's freakin badass. thumb.gif



EDIT: Also, check the benchmarks. If the benchmarks are indicative of actual performance, ASRock has created a midget beast!

I'm actually looking at going smaller for my next build but I couldn't decide between m-atx or m-itx. I wanted the small size of m-itx but I also wanted my next build to be a 5820k/X99. this mobo solves that problem and there is quite few m-itx cases I'm interested in (not to mention that there isn't that many m-atx X99 mobos to begin with sad-smiley-002.gif ).
James296 is offline  
post #18 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-29-2015, 11:54 AM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
ccRicers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,791
Rep: 72 (Unique: 66)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcfoo View Post

You are kidding, right?
A ITX 970 4GB from ASUS or Gigabyte is what? 150-170W.
Add 250W tops for a clocked s2011-3 i7, or half that if it is @ stock speeds. Next is summed up at 20-30W tops.

A 350W PSU is fine for stock clocks, a 450 is super safe, a 600W fine for overclocking.
I bet you that 90% of its life "on" it will be drawing less than 200W for the average OCN user.

And there are numerous ITX cases that accept full ATX PSUs, you don't have to go SFF, even for something as small as a CM Elite 110.

Even a Titan X at full tilt with a 5930K in the system draws just a bit more than 400w on all rails in stock, at its worst spikes. With that system a 500w gold rated PSU is fine.

I hope this paves the way for more of these ITX mobos soon. Asus and Gigabyte better not get lazy biggrin.gif
ccRicers is offline  
post #19 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-29-2015, 12:07 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Olivon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bordeaux
Posts: 1,796
Rep: 175 (Unique: 93)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman595 View Post

put a 16 core and a titan x on that little dude, also it would be cool to have support for ecc ram.

CT4G4RFS8213.9FA2 (ECC) is on RAM support list :

http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/X99E-ITXac/?cat=Memory

It's a 4GB stick so not enough to feed this little beast, further more testing is needed in order to know if ECC mode works well on it.

A good inititative from ASRock though and I quite like the idea. Maybe others vendors will give it a try too.

Olivon is offline  
post #20 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-29-2015, 04:04 PM
Linux Lobbyist
 
She loved E's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,651
Rep: 94 (Unique: 67)
I just read the review and two things stood out to me besides how badass this thing is. biggrin.gif

1. Dual channel ram, in real life, is just as good as quad channel. There goes 1/2 the arguments against that I hear. The other being that you can't take advantage of 40 pcie lanes... which if you don't need them is also a non-issue.

2. Why are reviewers always so surprised when hi-powered mini builds don't immediately overheat and explode? There are so many good cooling options out there that make that assumption seem really outdated. Yes stock cooling won't do a great job... but how many x99 builds at any size use stock cooling? Get the 'net!


She loved E is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off