[Guru3D] Asus Announces ProArt PQ22UC 21.6in Ultra HD HDR OLED monitor - Page 2 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[Guru3D] Asus Announces ProArt PQ22UC 21.6in Ultra HD HDR OLED monitor

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #11 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 04:19 PM
Overclocking Enthusiast
 
ozlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 5,326
Rep: 268 (Unique: 215)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CallsignVega View Post

Oh another actual OLED monitor. Going to have to buy some spectacles for this one.

3 in surround? biggrin.gif

In Loving Memory Of Kassandra

Kaby
Rikka
(11 items)
CPU
Intel I5-7600k
Motherboard
Asrock Z270M Extreme 4
GPU
Titan X
GPU
Titan X
RAM
Galax HOF
Hard Drive
850 pro
Hard Drive
960 Pro
Hard Drive
970 Evo
Power Supply
Seasonic Prime Snow
Case
enthoo evolv matx tempered glass
Operating System
windows 10 pro
▲ hide details ▲
ozlay is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 04:40 PM
Overclocker
 
JackCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 8,701
Rep: 284 (Unique: 209)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozlay View Post

3 in surround? biggrin.gif
If it's 3 when one orders a surround I will get it tongue.gif
JackCY is offline  
post #13 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 04:46 PM
Let's Launch Over It!
 
Omicron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 375
Rep: 15 (Unique: 14)
This would actually work for me - 200% scaling on Windows 7 works perfectly with everything I have, although I wish it was closer to 23.8"...

I wonder what the cost is though...



Omicron is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #14 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 04:54 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
CallsignVega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Saudi Arabia (US Military)
Posts: 8,216
Rep: 519 (Unique: 359)
Pro-Art, I'm guessing $3K.

CallsignVega is offline  
post #15 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 05:38 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
l88bastar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Van Down by the River
Posts: 1,426
Rep: 92 (Unique: 79)
That Oled is way to small....but extremely sexy. If it supported 120hz I would do it.....but if its only 60hz I would rather use my C7

Yeah like a really bad song on the radio that the station keeps repeating and repeating.
In time you find yourself tapping your foot and singing along.
It's like being programed.
l88bastar is offline  
post #16 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 05:41 PM
Official Luddite of OCN
 
SoloCamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 5,193
Rep: 402 (Unique: 211)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CallsignVega View Post

Oh another actual OLED monitor. Going to have to buy some spectacles for this one.

and people on this site told me my 28" 4k display was too small to be usable rolleyes.gif


4k box
(22 items)
Oculus Box
(6 items)
Lenovo G50-45
(6 items)
CPU
i7 4790k
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7
GPU
Sapphire Vega 64 1667mhz core / 1050 mem (reference air cooler)
RAM
G.Skill Trident X 16gb DDR3 2400mhz (2x8gb)
Hard Drive
Crucial M4 128gb
Hard Drive
Crucial MX100 256gb
Hard Drive
Crucial M500 480gb
Hard Drive
Crucial MX500 500gb
Hard Drive
Hyundai Sapphire 240gb
Hard Drive
Hyundai Sapphire 120gb
Optical Drive
LG Blu Ray RW
Power Supply
NZXT Hale82 850w
Cooling
Noctua NH-U12S
Case
Rosewill Thor V2 (Black)
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
ASUS PB287Q (4k)
Monitor
Dell Ultrasharp 1908FP
Keyboard
Corsair K55 RGB
Mouse
Cooler Master Storm Recon (black)
Mousepad
Steelseries QCK+
Audio
Creative SoundBlaster Z
Audio
Logitech Z-623
CPU
FX-8350
Motherboard
Asus Crosshair V Formula Z
GPU
Sapphire 290x
RAM
8gb DDR3 1600
Cooling
AMD FX Watercooler (came with 9590)
Operating System
Win10 pro 64bit
CPU
AMD A8-6410
GPU
AMD R5
RAM
Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR3L 1866 CAS10
Hard Drive
Crucial BX100 250gb
Optical Drive
DVD
Operating System
Windows 10 Home
▲ hide details ▲
SoloCamo is offline  
post #17 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 05:56 PM
Robotic Chemist
 
Asmodian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,382
Rep: 176 (Unique: 116)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoloCamo View Post

and people on this site told me my 28" 4k display was too small to be usable rolleyes.gif

28" at 1080p is too large but scaling needs to be at 2x or 1x, nothing in between or it is very blurry. This is why a 28" 4K is either too small or too big. tongue.gif

Effectively 1080p at 21.6" is actually a very nice size while also allowing high DPI rendering. This monitor will look amazing with high DPI aware applications and still decent with legacy ones, too bad it is probably* only 60Hz. sad-smiley-002.gif

*I haven't seen refresh rate mentioned in any of the announcements or articles, does anyone have some information I missed?
Asmodian is offline  
post #18 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 06:01 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
ILoveHighDPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,165
Rep: 132 (Unique: 84)
This is scaled exactly 25% from a 27" monitor, just sit 25% closer. The size is fine.

It's profoundly confusing that this wouldn't be released as a dedicated desktop monitor, nonetheless I might even make use of its portable nature.
As long as it doesn't cost over a thousand dollars this sounds fantastic.

(Ugh, then we still have the whole HDMI 2.1 VRR issue that the industry really needs to clarify sooner than later, products without VRR will have severely reduced value.)
ILoveHighDPI is offline  
post #19 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 06:29 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Hunched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,097
Rep: 37 (Unique: 31)
I am so sick of resolution > framerates/hz
Give me a 1080p 144hz+ 24"~ OLED

Like why are we starting out with 4K OLED? Aren't prices enough of a problem with OLED monitors as it is?
Lets not go with a reasonable resolution or anything for anywhere near a reasonable price
And 21"? Why...
Hunched is offline  
post #20 of 49 (permalink) Old 01-04-2018, 06:58 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
superstition222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,725
Rep: 218 (Unique: 102)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunched View Post

I am so sick of resolution > framerates/hz
Give me a 1080p 144hz+ 24"~ OLED

Like why are we starting out with 4K OLED? Aren't prices enough of a problem with OLED monitors as it is?
Lets not go with a reasonable resolution or anything for anywhere near a reasonable price
And 21"? Why...
4K is an artifact of the 1080 panel manufacturing chain. It was chosen simply because four 1080 panels could make one 4K, or something like that — not because there was an intrinsic benefit of 4K resolution that made it so much better than other resolutions.

If resolution progress had been sane we would have moved directly from 720 to 1440 instead of 720 to 1080 to 4K.

But, sanity doesn't benefit the planned obsolescence crowd.

You see, there are diminishing returns, especially in HDTV, for pixel density (pixel pitch). 1440 is basically good enough for HDTV, given reasonably normal vision and reasonably normal viewing distances. Well, TV makers wouldn't have been so happy not selling people a whole extra round of televisions (1080) that could clearly look blurrier than the next round when people are up close at the showroom.

1080 doesn't offer enough vertical resolution, in particular, to satisfy the limitations of even 20/20 human vision. 4K is pretty much overkill for HDTV. 1440 was the sweet spot for pixel pitch when all of the factors are considered. But, instead of that, we're now supposed to drool over 8K.

4K makes some sense on the desktop, when people are up close to the panel. But, the benefits of 4K over 1440 typically are outweighed by the drawbacks, especially with TV and film.

Free expression is the base of human rights, the root of human nature, and the mother of truth. — 刘晓波 (Liu Xiaobo)
superstition222 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off