[Guru3D] Asus Announces ProArt PQ22UC 21.6in Ultra HD HDR OLED monitor - Page 6 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[Guru3D] Asus Announces ProArt PQ22UC 21.6in Ultra HD HDR OLED monitor

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #51 of 53 (permalink) Old 03-22-2019, 04:49 PM
Overclocker
 
JackCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 10,124
Rep: 342 (Unique: 242)
Might as well buy the medical variant of monitor with same display at these prices.
JackCY is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #52 of 53 (permalink) Old 03-23-2019, 09:50 AM
Old to Overclock.net
 
xenophobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 6,111
Rep: 327 (Unique: 232)
I haven't used a monitor smaller than 30" in over a decade. No thanks.
xenophobe is offline  
post #53 of 53 (permalink) Old 03-23-2019, 03:31 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
ILoveHighDPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,288
Rep: 133 (Unique: 84)
Quote: Originally Posted by superstition222 View Post
Quote:Originally Posted by Zen00 

21.6" 4K? Can you even see the desktop icons at that small?

The point is to have pixel pitch well beyond diminishing returns, so everyone can pretend they have 20/9 vision.
Jaggies are easily visble at pixel densities far beyond this.

Human vision has different sensitivities to different types of patterns. “Edge Recognition” is one of the specialities of your eyes, but high frequency visual data overwhelms the photocell structure relatively quickly.
The way you “See” is a heavily processed image that uses motion and data gathered over time, from two sensors, to produce the image that pops up in your head, but all the HDTV marketing trying to say what pixel density is “Worth It” for the last 20 years has relied on a high frequency line pattern test that specifically defeats all of the mechanisms your eyes use to perceive fine detail.

It was effective marketing to sell corporate bigwigs on enormous upgrade budgets, and sell consumers on the new “High Definition” TV format that was supposed to be the best thing possible, but fundamentally anyone who has studied how your eyes work would have known very well that the marketing was misleading.

How people should practically decide on the value of increased pixel density is on a scale of diminishing returns.
Below 60 Pixels Per Degree you’re perceiving 100% of the detail, above that you start to gradually lose perception of some details that are too low in contrast or too high in frequency. Where a person with 20/20 vision will actually hit the theoretical wall of zero gain from higher density is around 300 Pixels Per Degree.
In general I base my numbers off the data here: https://michaelbach.de/ot/lum-hyperacuity/index.html
Or you can extrapolate what your highest posssible perceivable resolution is by looking at a lower resolution display from a greater distance than normal (which for most people gives results a bit above 300 Pixels Per Degree).

Last edited by ILoveHighDPI; 03-23-2019 at 03:54 PM.
ILoveHighDPI is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off