[vc] withdrawn ASUS X570 marketing slides - Page 3 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[vc] withdrawn ASUS X570 marketing slides

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #21 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-26-2019, 05:22 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Section31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 401
Rep: 6 (Unique: 6)
Quote: Originally Posted by bucdan View Post
Exactly why I don't support ASUS anymore for all of their products. They got extra cocky, raised prices, and yet they are putting out bullcrap like this. Gigabyte stepped up this gen, but there will always be MSI and AsRock in the market, to which I lean towards AsRock every time.
Gigabyte budget friendly mobos are the best deal this gen. You might regret buying the enthusiast grade X570 master down the road. We all know AMD will be moving away from AM4 for ryzen 3 (based on tsmc 5nm) and by then some new features will become more standard. Only matter of time till built in 10Gbe ethernet, PCIE 5.0, etc become standard stuff. Even I am starting to look into ways to implement 10Gbe but without having to get access into the house's drywall and replace all the cat 5e cables.
Section31 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-26-2019, 05:31 PM - Thread Starter
⎬⎛⎝⎠⎞⎨
 
TK421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,297
Rep: 158 (Unique: 123)
Quote: Originally Posted by magnek View Post
Not that it matters to 95% of buyers, but they also failed to mention the C8H for all its supposed superiority lacks a PS/2 port.
What's a ps/2 port good for nowadays?

Also, for the other boards that have ps/2, is that native or are they using some kind of converter to get the ps/2 signal?

nͫٴiͤٴcͫٴeͤ੮Һ૯ ცɿ૭ ૭คעٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴ ٴٴٴ
Desktop for gaming
(17 items)
ThinkPad T480
(9 items)
ThinkPad T430 XM
(9 items)
CPU
i7 5820K
Motherboard
X99 Deluxe
GPU
RTX 2080 Ti XC Ultra
RAM
Crucial 4x4GB
Hard Drive
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Hard Drive
WD Black 4TB
Hard Drive
WD Red 10TB
Optical Drive
Dell CH03N BD
Power Supply
EVGA 750 G2
Cooling
Swiftech Drive H360X3
Case
Phanteks Enthoo Luxe
Operating System
Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 1809
Monitor
BenQ XL2430T
Monitor
ASUS PG279Q
Keyboard
Bloody B850
Mouse
Logitech G102 Prodigy (Mercury)
CPU
i7 8550U
Motherboard
Lenovo Windu-2 20L5
GPU
Intel UHD 620
RAM
F4-3000C16D-16GRS | 2x8GB 2400MHz
Hard Drive
Intel NVME SSD 256GB
Power Supply
Lenovo 65w USB-C
Cooling
Delta 01YR200
Operating System
Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 1809
Monitor
LP140WF6-SPB7 FHD IPS
CPU
i7 3920XM
Motherboard
Nozomi 4 Type 2344 BZU
GPU
Intel HD4000
RAM
F3-2133C11-8GSRL | 2x8GB 2133MHz
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB
Power Supply
Lenovo 90W
Operating System
Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 1809
Monitor
AUO B140HAN01.3
Keyboard
Classic 7-row NMB 45N2211
▲ hide details ▲


TK421 is offline  
post #23 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-26-2019, 06:07 PM
⤷ αC
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,064
Rep: 899 (Unique: 589)
PS/2 acts as an interrupt (rather than polled) and on MSI Ace + Asrock Phantom Gaming X & Taichi it connects directly to the SuperIO chip from Nuvoton (on ASUS and Gigabyte it's ITE SuperIO chip for these functions)
Name:  Super-I-O-Series.jpg
Views: 86
Size:  110.2 KB

If you have a keyboard with n-key rollover , PS/2 is superior.

If you have USB lockout on boot due to security reasons * or your USB controller or hub dies on a board, PS/2 is superior for keyboard support to get into BIOS. Fast Boot sometimes skips USB detection as well. If you're using a legacy OS then PS/2 is also a superior choice for compatibility reasons (some people try to use PS/2 for benching on legacy OS with LN2).

People using IBM Model M keyboards generally buy PS/2 to USB adapters these days though.


* see ASUS Armory Crate infection: https://www.techpowerup.com/254065/h...s-of-computers

► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list



Last edited by AlphaC; 07-26-2019 at 06:11 PM.
AlphaC is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #24 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-26-2019, 08:16 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Nightingale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 815
Rep: 38 (Unique: 31)
Quote: Originally Posted by reqq View Post
First they crap my intel z170 bios.. then they release an absolut crap strix vega 64 card and now this. Glad im not supporting Asus anymore.
Wait I have a Z170 Asus board. How did they crap your bios and what revision was it?

Nightingale is offline  
post #25 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-26-2019, 09:36 PM
Professional Proletariat
 
magnek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Калифорния
Posts: 5,656
Rep: 478 (Unique: 192)
Quote: Originally Posted by TK421 View Post
What's a ps/2 port good for nowadays?

Also, for the other boards that have ps/2, is that native or are they using some kind of converter to get the ps/2 signal?
Installing Win 7 on modern platforms

It's more about Asus being hypocritical. Do 2 extra layers of PCB and 2 extra fake VRM phases really matter to someone not doing XOC? Almost certainly not. Likewise a PS/2 port is useless to most people, but high end board include it as another differentiating feature, something Asus left out on their flagship board for god knows why.

- 4930K @ 4.5 GHz | Asus X79-Deluxe
- MSi 980 Ti Gaming @ 1500/8000
- 4x4 GB Dominator Platinum 2400 MHz
- 2x 850 Pro 2TB
- Seasonic PRIME Titanium 850W
- Phanteks Enthoo Primo
- Custom watercooling (420+360+240)
- XB270HU 27" 1440p 144Hz IPS
magnek is offline  
post #26 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-26-2019, 11:00 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Caffinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 163
Rep: 2 (Unique: 2)
Lol they talk about layers but not the copper thickness. My Gigabyte from 2009 has 2oz copper advertised. The board lasted me 10 full years running severely overclocked chips. As it stands, my X5650 is at 4.4GHz.

I just bought my 2nd Gigabyte, a X299 board. I have the same board at work in my computer, and 2 others I built for co-workers. I7 7800x @ 4.8GHz easy, and one CAD station i7 7820X @ 4.1GHz(thermals bruuu)

I will continue to purchase Gigabyte motherboards.
Caffinator is offline  
post #27 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-27-2019, 01:45 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
reqq's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 373
Rep: 8 (Unique: 8)
Quote: Originally Posted by Nightingale View Post
Wait I have a Z170 Asus board. How did they crap your bios and what revision was it?
Z170-AR .. dont rememer what bios but before spectre fixes. Lowered my overclock but more severe i couldnt run 2 sticks of ram. System became very unstable with very random behavior. Could work one day then next day complete mess. Only real fix was to run with 1 stick. BTW i run these same sticks in my new ryzen msi board zero problems
reqq is offline  
post #28 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-27-2019, 02:10 AM
Sexagenarian
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sunny Qld AU
Posts: 1,000
Rep: 28 (Unique: 21)
I have had a good run with the Asus Crosshair boards ( [email protected] and [email protected] ) but have had multiple failures with their Strix ITX boards , all have been repaired under warranty , only one has failed to where it would not boot , I have A gigabyte board ( no issues ) and an Asrock taichi X470 that I am quite impressed with as well .The Taichi is my current Linux box , it just worked on mint straight out of the box , on mint 19
Asus does not need their PR team to spread B.S. they just need to bring their quality back to where it was ( they could improve their RMA process a bit ) and their products sell themselves .
I would think twice about their Strix series though .
pony-tail is offline  
post #29 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-27-2019, 03:30 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
dansi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 667
Rep: 21 (Unique: 19)
Regarding the hardware info test, to be fair, they are using the 12 core part. maybe asus design will play better with the 16 cores.
dansi is online now  
post #30 of 43 (permalink) Old 07-27-2019, 12:22 PM
⤷ αC
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,064
Rep: 899 (Unique: 589)
Quote: Originally Posted by dansi View Post
Regarding the hardware info test, to be fair, they are using the 12 core part. maybe asus design will play better with the 16 cores.
Maybe for the lower boards vs boards with doublers (due to the doubler delay *), but most definitely not their flagship. The math definitely doesn't check out unless you're pumping water through the Formula.

Assume you have 3 boards.

One (Xtreme) is driven by a state of the art (for computing) 16 phase direct PWM with fourteen 70A TDA21472 powerstages (peak efficiency ~95%) for VCORE and has a finned heatsink , thermal backplate, and 95% board coverage with metal. On a 8 layer PCB with 2oz copper. Keep in mind having actual 14 phases with current monitoring means you can achieve higher efficiency across the whole powerband (across more current values).

The other (Godlike) has 14 phases doubled from 7 to fourteen 70 TDA21472 powerstages (peak efficiency ~95%) for VCORE, 8 layer PCB, and minimal fin area.

The ASUS one has 7 phase "teamed" to 14 60A IR3555 powerstages (peak efficiency ~93.5%) for VCORE , minimal fin area compensated by using a backplate, and likely 8 layer PCB.

Guess what? That's exactly what the hardware info NL test shows: Xtreme ahead of Godlike which is ahead of ROG Formula/Hero.

The only way that the direct 14 phases is worse than 14 phases from teaming 7 is if the voltage being pumped in is absurd for the direct 14 phase while being a moderate 1.3V for the teamed design or if they're running at an operating point where the efficiency is lower for TDA21472 than IR3555. That still doesn't account for the fin area either and if you're not running water through the Formula the air inside the VRM waterblock acts as an insulator.

Until we have 16 cores in September I'm more inclined to believe it is ASUS manipulating BIOS settings than the ROG boards being superior to the Godlike and Xtreme. If you believe ASUS then they're preying on people's non-engineering gullibility.



* IR3599 ~8ns rise/fall transition ; propagation delay ~9-10ns https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/ir3599...5355cdb56a176f
* ISL6617 ~4.5ns rise/fall transition ; propagation delay ~35ns https://www.renesas.com/us/en/www/do...et/isl6617.pdf


----


P.S. in videocardz' comments section (older b450 comparison):
Click image for larger version

Name:	47c9a182aedd58d2891b38787dab64ecbcf533078dc9da8b7b3cdc5ee5c6badf.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	151.3 KB
ID:	284008
We know this to be distinctly false and physically impossible.
Tomahawk has better mosfets (4c024N+4c029N instead of 4c09n +4C06n) and 2x the high side fets along with a bigger extended heatsink
Spoiler!

http://oc.jagatreview.com/2018/08/ov...50-tomahawk/7/
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	hwunboxed.PNG
Views:	18
Size:	469.2 KB
ID:	284010  


► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list



Last edited by AlphaC; 07-27-2019 at 01:07 PM.
AlphaC is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off