[Guru3d] AMD wants to increase performance per cycle by more than 7 percent annually - Page 7 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community
Forum Jump: 

[Guru3d] AMD wants to increase performance per cycle by more than 7 percent annually

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #61 of 64 (permalink) Old 01-08-2020, 08:14 PM
What should be here ?
 
huzzug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,337
Rep: 358 (Unique: 256)
Quote: Originally Posted by UltraMega View Post
Not really, the point I was trying to make was just that 7% annually isn't unreasonable.
The point you tried to make was 2x increase in transistors becaise of Moores Law meant 2x increase in performance which never was the case and never will be.

#2 their debt is insane, even for a "diverse field" company. They cannot even afford to service the debt maintenance let alone make an actual dent in the debt itself. - Internet Stranger
huzzug is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 64 (permalink) Old 01-08-2020, 11:17 PM - Thread Starter
Graphics Junkie
 
UltraMega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,659
Rep: 38 (Unique: 34)
Quote: Originally Posted by huzzug View Post
The point you tried to make was 2x increase in transistors becaise of Moores Law meant 2x increase in performance which never was the case and never will be.
That was actually not my point of you go back to what started this debate, though I'll admit I'm no hardware engineer and the finer points of how a CPU works are way beyond me.

In any case, I'm done with this thread. Pages upon pages of pointless debate.

4K Rig
(7 items)
CPU
Intel 7700k @4.2ghz
GPU
Zotec 1080 Ti
RAM
16GB 3200mhz DDR4
Hard Drive
250GB nvme + 500GB SSD + 4TB HDD
Monitor
Samsung 4K 65 inch TV
Monitor
Pixio PX276 27inch 144Hz 1ms 1440p
Audio
Sound Blaster z
▲ hide details ▲
UltraMega is offline  
post #63 of 64 (permalink) Old 01-08-2020, 11:37 PM
What should be here ?
 
huzzug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,337
Rep: 358 (Unique: 256)
Quote: Originally Posted by UltraMega View Post
That was actually not my point of you go back to what started this debate, though I'll admit I'm no hardware engineer and the finer points of how a CPU works are way beyond me.

In any case, I'm done with this thread. Pages upon pages of pointless debate.
Quote: Originally Posted by UltraMega View Post
It wasn't that long ago that we would see a 50% gain every 18 months.
Yea sure.

#2 their debt is insane, even for a "diverse field" company. They cannot even afford to service the debt maintenance let alone make an actual dent in the debt itself. - Internet Stranger
huzzug is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #64 of 64 (permalink) Old 01-09-2020, 06:50 AM
Hey I get one of these!
 
KyadCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,377
Rep: 313 (Unique: 219)
Quote: Originally Posted by huzzug View Post
The point you tried to make was 2x increase in transistors becaise of Moores Law meant 2x increase in performance which never was the case and never will be.
I mean...

The 3950X is pretty close to dead on with 2x transistor count as compared to a 2700X and is roughly double the performance in highly parallel workloads. The logic can apply to node shrinks and core count boosts as adding more cores is, at least with AMD's design, largely linear.

But certainly never with IPC, no, and that was never Moore's law, which simply stated that transistor count would double every 24 months.

Forge
(15 items)
CPU
AMD Ryzen R9 3900X
Motherboard
Gigabyte X570 Master
GPU
AMD 5700XT PowerColor Devil
RAM
32GB G.Skill TridentZ Neo (2x16GB 3600Mhz/C16)
Hard Drive
Intel 900P 480GB
Power Supply
Corsair AX1200
Cooling
Corsair H150i
Case
Phanteks Evolv X
Operating System
Windows 10 Enterprise x64
Monitor
2x Acer XR341CK
Keyboard
Corsair Vengeance K70 RGB
Mouse
Corsair Vengeance M65 RGB
Audio
Sennheiser HD700
Audio
Sound Blaster AE-9
Audio
Audio Technica AT4040
▲ hide details ▲
KyadCK is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off